FOCUS: A Phase I/II First in Human Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of GT005 Administered in Subjects With Dry AMD

January 8, 2026 updated by: Gyroscope Therapeutics Limited

FOCUS: An Open Label First in Human Phase I/II Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Safety, Dose Response and Efficacy of GT005 Administered as a Single Subretinal Injection in Subjects With Macular Atrophy Due to AMD

This was an open label first in human Phase I/II multicentre study of GT005 in subjects with Macular Atrophy due to Age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was an open label first-in-human Phase I/II multicenter study to evaluate the safety, dose response and efficacy of GT005 in participants with Geographic atrophy (GA) due to Age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

The study treatment GT005 consists of an Adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2) expressing human complement factor I (hCFI). The treatment was administered as a single subretinal administration in one eye - the "study eye". Both eyes were assessed at the screening visit. If both eyes meet the eligibility criteria, the study eye will be the worse seeing eye, or the eye with the largest geographic atrophy (GA) lesion area for eyes with equivalent visual acuity, unless the participant (in consultation with the surgeon) expresses an alternative preference.

The study was conducted in 4 parts: in Part 1 and Part 2 GT005 was administered subretinally via transvitreal procedure; in Part 3 and 4 GT005 was delivered subretinally via a suprachoroidal cannulation with the Orbit Subretinal delivery system (SDS). The Orbit SDS is a 510(k) cleared device in the US, whereby Parts 3 and 4 were only conducted at US sites. The treatment consisted in 3 dose levels: low dose, 2E10 vector genomes (vg); medium dose, 5E10 vg; and high dose, 2E11 vg.

The study consisted of up to 13 visits over a 5-year period. All participants were assessed for the occurrence of treatment emergent adverse events (AE)s at each visit and underwent visual function and retinal imaging assessments and biological sampling as per the schedule of assessments.

This study was conducted in compliance with Independent ethics committees (IECs) / Institutional review boards (IRBs), informed consent regulations, the Declaration of Helsinki, nternational Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bristol, United Kingdom
        • Bristol Eye Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Moorfields Eye Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, W1G 7LA
        • Retina Clinic London
      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • Manchester Eye Hospital
      • Oxford, United Kingdom
        • Oxford University Hospital
      • Sunderland, United Kingdom
        • Sunderland Eye Infirmary
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
        • Midwest Eye Institute
    • Iowa
      • West Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50266
        • Wolfe Eye Clinic
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Ophthalamic Consultants of Boston (OCB)
    • Missouri
      • Chesterfield, Missouri, United States, 63017
        • Pepose Vision Institute
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States, 89502
        • Sierra Eye Associates
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45242
        • Cincinnati Eye Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Mid-Atlantic Retina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able and willing to give consent to study participation
  2. Have a clinical diagnosis of GA secondary to AMD in the study eye, as determined by the Investigator, and a diagnosis of AMD in the contralateral eye (except if the subject is monocular)
  3. Cohorts 1 to 6: GA lesion(s) total size in the study eye must be ≥1.25mm2 and ≤17.5mm2.

    Cohort 7: GA lesion(s) total size in the study eye must be ≥1.25mm2

  4. GA lesion(s) in the study eye must reside completely within the FAF fundus image
  5. Cohorts 1 to 3: BCVA of ≤50 letters (6/36 Snellen acuity equivalent or worse) using ETDRS charts in the study eye Cohorts 4 to 7: BCVA of ≥24 letters (6/95 and 20/320 Snellen acuity equivalent or better) using ETDRS charts in the study eye
  6. Aged ≥55 years
  7. Able to attend all study visits and complete the study procedures
  8. Women of child-bearing potential need to have a negative urine pregnancy test within two weeks prior to receiving the drug. A pregnancy test is not required for postmenopausal women (defined as being at least 12 consecutive months without menses) or those surgically sterilised (those having a bilateral tubal ligation/bilateral salpingectomy, bilateral tubal occlusive procedure, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have evidence or history of Choroidal Neovascularisation (CNV) in the study eye. Subjects are permitted to have CNV in the fellow eye defined as either:

    1. Non-exudative/sub-clinical fellow eye CNV identified at screening, or
    2. Known history of fellow eye CNV with either ≥2 years since diagnosis or with no active treatment required in 6 months prior to screening
  2. Presence of moderate/severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy or worse in the study eye
  3. Have history of vitrectomy, sub-macular surgery, or macular photocoagulation in the study eye
  4. History of intraocular surgery in the study eye within 12 weeks prior to Screening (Visit 1). Yttrium aluminum garnet capsulotomy is permitted if performed >10 weeks prior to Visit 1
  5. Have clinically significant cataract that may require surgery during the study period in the study eye
  6. Presence of moderate to severe glaucomatous optic neuropathy in the study eye; uncontrolled IOP despite the use of more than two topical agents; a history of glaucoma-filtering or valve surgery is also excluded
  7. Axial myopia of greater than -8 diopters in the study eye
  8. Have received any investigational product for the treatment of GA within the past 6 months or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer), other than nutritional supplements such as the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) formula
  9. Have received a gene or cell therapy at any time
  10. Have a contraindication to the specified protocol corticosteroid regimen
  11. Are unwilling to use two forms of contraception (one of which being a barrier method) for 90 days post-dosing, if relevant
  12. Active malignancy within the past 12 months, except for: Appropriately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, non-melanoma skin carcinoma, or prostate cancer with a stable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥12 months
  13. Have any other significant ocular or non-ocular medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the subject at risk or may influence the results of the study
  14. Cohorts 5 to 7 only: presence of metallic objects or implanted stimulator devices in or near the head, including cochlear implants, deep brain stimulators, vagus nerve stimulators, and other implanted electrodes or stimulators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GT005 2E10 vg via Transvitreal Procedure
GT005 is a recombinant, non-replicating AAV2 expressing human complement factor I (CFI). GT005 was administered as a single time subretinal injection into the study eye of subjects allocated to one of the two GT005 doses.
Experimental: GT005 5E10 vg via Transvitreal Procedure
GT005 is a recombinant, non-replicating AAV2 expressing human complement factor I (CFI). GT005 was administered as a single time subretinal injection into the study eye of subjects allocated to one of the two GT005 doses.
Experimental: GT005 2E11 vg via Transvitreal Procedure
GT005 is a recombinant, non-replicating AAV2 expressing human complement factor I (CFI). GT005 was administered as a single time subretinal injection into the study eye of subjects allocated to one of the two GT005 doses.
Experimental: GT005 5E10 vg with Orbit Subretinal Delivery System

GT005 is a recombinant, non-replicating AAV2 expressing human complement factor I (CFI).

A single dose of GT005 was administered with subretinal injection via suprachoroidal cannulation approach.

Device: Orbit™ Subretinal Delivery System

Experimental: GT005 2E11 vg with Orbit Subretinal Delivery System

GT005 is a recombinant, non-replicating AAV2 expressing human complement factor I (CFI).

A single dose of GT005 was administered with subretinal injection via suprachoroidal cannulation approach.

Device: Orbit™ Subretinal Delivery System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye
Time Frame: Adverse events are reported from the single dose of study medication administration until end of study treatment plus 240 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 240 weeks.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

System organ classes are sorted alphabetically, and preferred terms are sorted by decreasing overall frequency within system organ class.

Adverse events are reported from the single dose of study medication administration until end of study treatment plus 240 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 240 weeks.
Summary of Non-Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: Adverse events are reported from the single dose of study medication administration until end of study treatment plus 240 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 240 weeks.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

Adverse events are reported from the single dose of study medication administration until end of study treatment plus 240 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 240 weeks.
Summary of Ocular Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events in the Study Eye by System Organ Class and Preferred
Time Frame: Adverse events are reported from the single dose of study medication administration until end of study treatment plus 240 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 240 weeks.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

Adverse events are reported from the single dose of study medication administration until end of study treatment plus 240 weeks post treatment, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 240 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letters) in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Up to Week 240

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.

Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.

Up to Week 240
Low-Luminance Deficit Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA-LLVA) (in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letters) in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Up to Week 240

Low-Luminance Deficit best corrected visual acuity (BCVA-LLVA) was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.

Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.

Up to Week 240
Macular Sensitivity Parameters by Mesopic Microperimetry (MP) Over Time in the Study Eye - MP Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area (BCEA) 63 Area (deg2)
Time Frame: Up to Week 240

Macular sensitivity as assessed by mesopic Microperimetry.

Mesopic Microperimetry (MP) Bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) 63 Area.

Up to Week 240
Macular Sensitivity Parameters by Mesopic Microperimetry (MP) Over Time in the Study Eye - MP Bivariate Contour Ellipse Area (BCEA) 95 Area (deg2)
Time Frame: Up to Week 240

Macular sensitivity as assessed by mesopic Microperimetry.

Mesopic Microperimetry (MP) Bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) 95 Area.

Up to Week 240
Macular Sensitivity Parameters by Mesopic Microperimetry (MP) Over Time in the Study Eye - MP Mean Sensitivity Decibel (dB)
Time Frame: Up to Week 240
Macular sensitivity as assessed by mesopic Microperimetry
Up to Week 240
Macular Sensitivity Parameters by Mesopic Microperimetry (MP) Over Time in the Study Eye - MP Number of Scotomatous Points
Time Frame: Up to Week 240
Macular sensitivity as assessed by mesopic Microperimetry
Up to Week 240
Macular Sensitivity Parameters by Mesopic Microperimetry (MP) Over Time in the Study Eye - MP Percent Fixation Loss (%)
Time Frame: Up to Week 240
Macular sensitivity as assessed by mesopic Microperimetry
Up to Week 240
Change From Baseline Over Time in Square Root of Geographic Atrophy Area Size (mm) Via FAF in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Up to Week 240
Change from baseline in GA size as assessed by fundus autofluorescence
Up to Week 240
Delivery of GT005 to the Subretinal Space - Rate of Successful Delivery, % (US Only) Via the Orbit Subretinal Delivery System (SDS) Device
Time Frame: Day 1

The rate of successful delivery is an evaluation limited to the administration performed using the Orbit Subretinal Delivery System (SDS) device, which is a 510(k) cleared device in the US.

The rate of successful delivery of GT005 is the number of full doses delivered divided by number of Orbit devices used.

This endpoint evaluates the surgical procedure with the Orbit device, and it is independent of the dose administered, as the volume of GT005 administered was consistent across all arms and cohorts.

The delivery was attempted in 28 pts but was only successful in 25 pts. Of 3 pts where the GT005 delivery via Orbit SDS arms was not successful, 2 were treated via the transvitreal procedure, and 1 was disc. from treatment. (For 1 of the 3 pts, BSS delivery was successful, but not GT005 delivery.) In all other efficacy tables, these 2 pts who were treated via the transvitreal procedure are included in the 1 of the 3 Transvitreal Procedure arms and not 1 of the 2 Orbit SDS arms.

Day 1
Delivery of Balanced Salt Solution (BSS) or BSS PLUS (BSS+) to the Subretinal Space - Rate of Successful Delivery, % (US Only) Via the Orbit Subretinal Delivery System (SDS) Device
Time Frame: Day 1

The rate of successful delivery is an evaluation limited to the administration performed using the Orbit Subretinal Delivery System (SDS) device, which is a 510(k) cleared device in the US.

The rate of successful delivery of BSS was the number of full doses delivered divided by number of Orbit devices used.

This endpoint evaluates the surgical procedure with the Orbit device, and it is independent of the dose administered, as the volume of BSS administered was consistent across all arms and cohorts.

The delivery was attempted in 28 pts but was only successful in 25 pts. Of 3 pts where the GT005 delivery via Orbit SDS arms was not successful, 2 were treated via the transvitreal procedure, and 1 was disc. from treatment. (For 1 of the 3 pts, BSS delivery was successful, but not GT005 delivery.) In all other efficacy tables, these 2 pts who were treated via the transvitreal procedure are included in the 1 of the 3 Transvitreal Procedure arms and not 1 of the 2 Orbit SDS arms.

Day 1
Summary of Ocular Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Related to Surgical Procedure in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Day 1

Subjects with device related AEs and SAEs after subretinal delivery with Orbit SDS.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

System organ classes are sorted alphabetically, and preferred terms are sorted by decreasing overall frequency within system organ class.

Day 1
Summary of Non-Ocular Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Related to Surgical Procedure
Time Frame: Day 1

Subjects with device related AEs and SAEs after subretinal delivery with Orbit SDS.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

System organ classes are sorted alphabetically, and preferred terms are sorted by decreasing overall frequency within system organ class.

Day 1
Summary of Ocular Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Related to Surgical Procedure in the Study Eye
Time Frame: Day 1

Subjects with device related AEs and SAEs after subretinal delivery with Orbit SDS.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

System organ classes are sorted alphabetically, and preferred terms are sorted by decreasing overall frequency within system organ class.

Day 1
Summary of Non-Ocular Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Related to Surgical Procedure
Time Frame: Day 1

Subjects with device related AEs and SAEs after subretinal delivery with Orbit SDS.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

System organ classes are sorted alphabetically, and preferred terms are sorted by decreasing overall frequency within system organ class.

Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Chief Medical Officer, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Eye Diseases

Clinical Trials on GT005

Subscribe