Medico-economics and QoL of Obese Patients Followed by Medical Analysis Laboratories (BIOSAOS ) (BIOSAOS)

January 3, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Medico-economic and Quality of Life Evaluations in Obese Patients Followed by Medical Analysis Laboratories

Obesity is a major risk factor for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, OSA is still largely under diagnosed in patients with a high cardiovascular risk. In this population the STOP-BANG questionnaire facilitates OSA screening. Moreover, blood bicarbonate concentration is a simple tool to screen for chronic respiratory disease and if elevated, is a marker of cardiometabolic comorbidities in obese patients. A combination of blood bicarbonate concentration and STOP BANG score could provide a cost-effective method of screening for OSA in obese patients. Such screening could enable earlier management and might significantly reduce the costs of treatment and improve the quality of life of patients at 2 years.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

OSA is a frequent condition in the general population (3% of women and 10% of men), but remains largely undiagnosed. Obesity is a risk factor for OSA. Sleep apnea is associated with diurnal and nocturnal symptoms (snoring, somnolence, fatigue), and with increased cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality. Currently, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold-standard treatment for OSA and the cost-effectiveness of this treatment has already been demonstrated. Easy-to-use procedures to identify OSA patients earlier and thus to initiate treatment earlier, need to be developed and validated. The STOP-BANG questionnaire has been designed to facilitate the screening of OSA patients. Moreover, a measure of blood bicarbonate concentration is a simple method for screening for chronic respiratory diseases and a marker of cardiometabolic comorbidities. A combination of blood bicarbonate measurement and STOP-BANG score could permit earlier screening and less expensive care of obese patients. The hypothesize is that such OSA screening in the obese population (bicarbonates + STOPBANG) associated with earlier care (with treatment if necessary) could lead to improvement in quality of life of obese patients at 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vizille, France
        • ORIADE

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged from 18 to 80 years
  • Obese (BMI ≥ 30kg/m²)
  • Referred by GPs to the medical analysis laboratory for usual biological assessment
  • Patients with no respiratory follow-up already in place
  • Patient affiliated with a social protection plan
  • Bicarbonate - Concentration ≥ 27 mmol/L
  • STOP-BANG score ≥ 3
  • Informed written consent signed by the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute disease or recently diagnosed chronic disease (< 2 months)
  • Hospitalization for respiratory, metabolic or cardiovascular event (< 2 months)
  • Renal insufficiency stage 4 or 5, or autoimmune disease, or viral hepatitis, or cirrhosis
  • Cited persons in Sections L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP (pregnant woman, parturient, nursing mother, person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, a person who is the subject of a judicial or administrative legal protection)
  • Patients already included in an interventional study (end of the study < 1 month)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual care
Patients in the usual care group will be referred to their general practitioner (GP) / primary care practitioner as usual.
Active Comparator: Early care
A different care pathway will be followed by the patients randomized to this group. They will be referred to a specialist (pneumologist) for OSA diagnosis and treatment if necessary
Screening for OSA using a combination of bicarbonate assay and STOP-BANG questionnaire and further management by a pneumologist as necessary

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-year medico-economic impact of the implementation of early care in obese patients with OSA
Time Frame: 24 months
incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 24 months calculated from the difference in healthcare costs between the 2 groups (early care vs usual care) adjusted to the difference in the number of quality adjusted life years
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Economic impact of the implementation of early care in obese patients with OSA over 3 years on the healthcare costs
Time Frame: 3 years
The economic impact on healthcare costs from the Health Insurer's perspective will be calculated from the difference in healthcare costs between the two groups (early care vs usual care)
3 years
To evaluate the sensitivity of the screening tool
Time Frame: 24 months
The sensitivity will be evaluated by comparison with polysomnography
24 months
To evaluate the specificity of the screening tool
Time Frame: 24 months
The specificity will be evaluated by comparison with polysomnography
24 months
To evaluate the negative Predictive Value
Time Frame: 24 months
The negative predictive value will be evaluated by comparison with polysomnography
24 months
To evaluate the positive predictive value of the screening tool
Time Frame: 24 months
The positive predictive value will be evaluated by comparison with polysomnography
24 months
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on blood pressure at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Blood pressure at home
12 months
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on blood pressure at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
Blood pressure at home
24 months
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on quality of life at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire, This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health status. 0 means the worst health status.
12 months
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on quality of life at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire, This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health status. 0 means the worst health status.
24 months
Clinical impact of the early care pathway (early care) on quality of life at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL), This questionnaire is intended to study the relationship between sleep and the quality of life. This scale is numbered from 0 to 4. higher values represent a worse outcome
12 months
Clinical impact of the early care pathway (early care) on quality of life at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL), This questionnaire is intended to study the relationship between sleep and the quality of life. This scale is numbered from 0 to 4. higher values represent a worse outcome
24 months
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on pharmacological treatments at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
number of pharmacological treatments
12 months
Clinical impact of the early care pathway on pharmacological treatments at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
number of pharmacological treatments
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results (troponin) at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
troponin
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results (troponin) at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
troponin
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results (NT-proBNP) at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
NT-proBNP
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results (NT-proBNP) at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
NT-proBNP
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results on cholesterol at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
cholesterol
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results on cholesterol at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
cholesterol
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results on triglycerides at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
triglycerides
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results on triglycerides at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
triglycerides
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results on glycaemia at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
glycaemia
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results on glycaemia at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
glycaemia
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results on Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-index at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-index
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results on Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-index at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-index
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results on hepatic transaminases at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
transaminases (ASAT, ALAT)
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results on hepatic transaminases at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
transaminases (ASAT, ALAT)
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results on creatinine at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
creatinine
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results on creatinine at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
creatinine
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
24 months
Impact on laboratory test results on alpha2-macroglobulin at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
alpha2-macroglobulin
12 months
Impact on laboratory test results on alpha2-macroglobulin at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
alpha2-macroglobulin
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on Care pathway

3
Subscribe