Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Over the Internet (IRENE)

February 21, 2025 updated by: Eeva-Liisa Kallio, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Web-based Neuropsychological Rehabilitation After Acquired Brain Injury

Helsinki University Hospital (HUS) has decided on a strategy to provide digital health care services for several medical specialties - a project called the Health Village (HealthVillage.fi). Within Health Village a specific digital My Path program, iRENE Digital Pathway, has been developed for web-based neuropsychological rehabilitation. iRENE Digital Pathway is a structured program for adults with an acquired brain injury (ABI), which utilizes psychoeducative information and self-evaluation questionnaires for attentional, memory and executive disorders with a feedback, and provides training for internal and external memory and other cognitive strategies. The current study will explore if web-based neuropsychological rehabilitation is a feasible and effective method for carrying out rehabilitation for adults with ABI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The IRENE study will explore the application, feasibility and effectiveness of web-based neuropsychological rehabilitation for working-aged patients with ABI during the first year of recovery. This study will adopt a 2-arm randomized controlled design with treatment-as-usual control.

The investigators will determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a web-based rehabilitation program for patients with ABI on their subjective memory difficulties, management of cognitive symptoms, self-efficacy, fatigue, mood, anxiety, quality of life and subjective working ability. The study will examine, if the method is accessible as well as if neurological patients are able and willing to use web-based rehabilitation. The potential health-economic benefits of the new rehabilitation program will be assessed with the duration of patients' sick leave after ABI and through the net benefit of neuropsychological rehabilitation resources.

A pilot randomized trial with 60 participants will be conducted to address the rate of recruitment of the participants, patient acceptability and adherence to study protocol, retention rates and feedback of the iRENE program as well as initial data on effectiveness of this new program. This pilot trial will use an unequal randomization 2:1 to maximize experiences in delivering the digital intervention to patients after ABI. The intervention group will participate in the iRENE Digital Pathway, a web-based rehabilitation program, that takes 2-3 months to complete. The control group attends treatment as usual, which includes necessary outpatient rehabilitation.

Outcome measures at baseline, post-intervention and 3-month follow-up after completing the intervention are gathered as self-assessments.

The participants are adult patients from neurological acute wards and outpatient clinics from HUS, Finland. Patients with ABI typically get referral to neuropsychological examination at the acute or the sub-acute phase of recovery. The examining clinical neuropsychologist offers a patient the possibility to get involved in the research. A neuropsychologist from the research group interviews voluntary patients at hospital or via telephone to confirm patient's interest and fulfillment of inclusion criteria.

Intervention group will go through a systematic web-based neuropsychological intervention program. Participants carry out the web-based intervention independently with their own digital appliance (computer, tablet or mobile phone) time and place of one's choice.

Control group attends the standard care of patients with ABI including all necessary outpatient rehabilitation visits. A possibility to attend to the iRENE Digital Pathway will be offered to control group participants after they have performed the 5-month assessment of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Helsinki, Finland, FI-00029
        • HUS Neurocenter, Helsinki University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute neurological incident affecting cognition (stroke, encephalitis, traumatic brain injury, anoxia)
  • Less than 6 months from occurrence of an acute neurological incident
  • Mild to moderate cognitive deficits on a clinical neuropsychological assessment during inpatient or outpatient care after ABI
  • Subjective cognitive symptoms following ABI
  • Proficient in Finnish
  • Must be able to use digital appliances

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not an acute neurological incident
  • More than 6 months from an acute neurological incident
  • Severe cognitive deficits on a clinical neuropsychological assessment during inpatient or outpatient care after ABI
  • Not fluent in Finnish
  • Not able to use digital appliances

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital care pathway
Intervention group goes through a web-based neuropsychological intervention program. The program includes eight structured sessions regarding general neuropsychological symptoms after ABI - problems with fatigue, attention, executive functions and memory. A new session opens after the previous one is completed, and after a minimum of 3 days between the sessions. The intervention takes approximately 2 months depending on the progression pace of a patient. The eight sessions consist of psychoeducation, self-assessments, cognitive strategy training and feedback (automatic or given by a monitoring neuropsychologist). A neuropsychologist from HUS monitors patients' progression and provides personal feedback when needed. Participants can also be in contact with a monitoring neuropsychologist via message feature of the program.

Sessions of the digital neuropsychological program:

  1. Subjective functional ability and goals
  2. Fatigue after ABI
  3. Attention and concentration
  4. Memory
  5. Memory strategies
  6. Working memory and executive functions
  7. Emotional reactions
  8. Summary and future goals
Other Names:
  • iRENE Digital pathway
Active Comparator: Care as usual
Control group attends the standard care of patients with ABI in HUS including all necessary outpatient rehabilitation visits. When available, neuropsychological rehabilitation typically takes 1-2 months among the study target group.
The standard care of patients with ABI including all necessary outpatient rehabilitation visits. Neuropsychological visits may include a short period of psychoeducation with a clinical neuropsychologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Baseline Perceived Subjective Cognitive symptoms at 2 months and 5 months
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Administration of the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised; The minimum total score is 0 and the maximum score is 52; The higher total score represents more severe subjective cognitive symptoms
Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Baseline Perceived Use of Memory Aids at 2 months and 5 months
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Administration of the Adaptation to Memory Difficulties Outcome Questionnaire; The questionnaire includes subscales assessing memory knowledge and emotional adjustment (15 questions), use of external memory aids (5 questions) and use of internal memory aids (5 questions); Each item will be scored on a 4-point scale 1-4; Each of the three parts of the questionnaire will be analyzed separately; A higher score would signify better adaptation.
Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Change of Baseline Perceived Self-Efficacy at 2 months and 5 months
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Administration of the New General Self-Efficacy Scale; The New General Self-Efficacy Scale is an 8-item measure that assesses how much people believe they can achieve their goals, despite difficulties; The minimum total score is 1 and the maximum score is 5; The higher total score represents higher self-efficacy
Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Change of Baseline Perceived Anxiety at 2 months and 5 months
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Administration of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): anxiety; The minimum total raw score is 8 and the maximum score is 40; The higher total score represents higher anxiety
Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Change of Baseline Perceived Depression at 2 months and 5 months
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Administration of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): depression; The minimum total raw score is 8 and the maximum score is 40; The higher total score represents higher depression
Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Change of Baseline Perceived Quality of life at 2 months and 5 months
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Administration of the Euro-Qol (EQ-5D) Questionnaire; The minimum total raw score is 0 and the maximum score is 100; The higher score represents higher quality of life in terms of self-perceived health
Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Change of Baseline Perceived Fatigue at 2 months and 5 months
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Administration of the Fatigue Assessment Scale; The minimum total raw score is 10 and the maximum score is 50; The higher total score represents more severe fatigue
Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Baseline Perceived Working ability at 2 months and 5 months
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Administration of the Work Ability Index; The minimum total score is 0 and the maximum score is 24; The higher total score represents better self-perceived working ability
Baseline, Month 2, and Month 5
Length of sick leave of a patient
Time Frame: Month 5
Length of sick leave in days after acquired brain injury
Month 5
Intervention feedback questionnaire
Time Frame: Month 2

Feedback of the neuropsychological rehabilitation period offered during the study; Participants give their evaluation in a 5-point likert scale; The higher total score represents more positive evaluation;

% of patients with positive and negative evaluation will be reported

Month 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marja Hietanen, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Encephalitis

Clinical Trials on Digital care pathway

Subscribe