- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04142463
Collaborative Network to Take Responsibility for Oral Anticancer Therapy 2 (CONTACT-2)
CONTACT-2: A Prospective Interventional Multicentre Before-after Study for the Implementation of a Care Pathway to Increase Self-management of Patients With Cancer Who Are Treated With Oral Anticancer Drugs
In 2015, the research team of KU Leuven and UGent started a pilot project supported by Kom op Tegen Kanker, called CONTACT-1. This multicentre before-after study aims at developing, implementing and evaluating a care pathway for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs (OACD) in four oncology centres in Flanders (AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, AZ Imelda Bonheiden, AZ Maria Middelares Gent, AZ Turnhout).
Preliminary results from CONTACT-1 have shown that re-organisation of care processes, and better interdisciplinary collaboration and communication, are highly needed, and that working towards a care pathway is an appropriate method to achieve this. However, the development and implementation of the care pathway in each hospital was difficult and needed intensive coaching by the research team. Moreover, we have currently no insight in the impact of the care pathway on defined outcomes, neither on the sustainability of the implemented care pathway.
In CONTACT-2, we will expand the development and implementation of a care pathway to 10 additional oncology centres in Flanders. In contrast to CONTACT-1, the CONTACT-2 oncology centres will take the lead in the development, implementation and evaluation of the care pathway, supported by the research team en by the CONTACT-Toolkit. This toolkit was developed based on the experiences from CONTACT-1 and international guidelines on the implementation of care pathways/complex interventions.
Similar to CONTACT-1, we hypothesise that the implementation of a care pathway will improve the level of self-management and the quality of patient-centred care, and will increase adherence, patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life. Next, we hypothesise that the care pathway will improve counselling practice, interdisciplinary collaboration, self-efficacy and self-confidence of healthcare professionals (HCP). The impact of a care pathway on the above outcomes in patients as well as in HCPs will be investigated by means of various assessments, that have been selected by the research team based on their experiences from CONTACT-1. Moreover, we hypothesize that the development and implementation process will be more efficient in the CONTACT-2 oncology centres, who will need less intensive support of the research team, due to the CONTACT-Toolkit. A process evaluation will be conducted to test this last hypothesis.
Further in-depth analysis of the impact of the care pathway, combined with a thorough process evaluation, should eventually lead to insight in the crucial factors for sustainable implementation of a care pathway, as well as to definite conclusions on its impact for patients and HCPs.
Throughout CONTACT-2, the CONTACT-toolkit will be further elaborated, optimised and digitised based on the experiences of the research team and feedback from the CONTACT-2 oncology centres. The toolkit will enable a nation-wide and sustainable implementation of similar care pathways for patients treated with OACD.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The study will be a prospective interventional multicentre before-after study with a total duration of 36 months and will be coordinated by a consortium of researchers from UGent and KU Leuven supported by Kom op Tegen Kanker. The intervention is the self-directed development and implementation of a care pathway in ten hospitals in Flanders.
The general lead throughout the study will be the 7-phase model for the development of a care pathway, which is translated to the specific context of OACD in the CONTACT-Toolkit. This methodology aims to offer a systematic approach for the support of an interdisciplinary team in the development of new care pathways or in the improvement of existing ones.
The CONTACT-Toolkit will serve as a roadmap that will guide the participating hospitals through the various phases and will therefore enable the self-directed development and implementation of the care pathway. Besides an overall guidance through the different phases of the 7-phase model, the toolkit contains additional tools including: presentations to structure internal meetings, tools and methods to map current practice, tools to measure key performance indicators, tools to support the development of a care pathway and tools to support counselling of patients treated with OACD (e.g. guide for telephone follow-up, guide for counselling at the start of the treatment).
In phase 1 and 2, a project structure is set up in each participating hospital by appointing a local coordinator and project team for the development of the care pathway. In phase 3, a detailed mapping of the current care process, which serves as before-study, will take place. Current practice will be evaluated from four different perspectives: own organisation and team, patients, external partners and independent observer. Assessments are performed by means of validated questionnaires and observations of daily practice by the research team. In phase 4, the care pathway will be developed by the project team, with respect to the results obtained from the mapping of current practice. During this phase, the research team will also provide training (i.e. e-learning, live training sessions) to all participating HCPs, to expand their medical knowledge on OACD and to improve counselling skills. The actual implementation of the care pathway is foreseen in phase 5. In phase 6, an evaluation of the care will be performed from the same four perspectives as in phase 3. This evaluation will include validated questionnaires, an interview with the coordinator, a focus group with the project team and participating HCPs and a second round of observations using a checklist and time task matrix of the care pathway document. In phase 7, the research team will take the necessary steps to guarantee the continuous follow-up of the care pathway without their further support.
To assess the impact of the care pathway on the level of the patient and the HCP, data obtained from the assessments in phase 3 (i.e. before-group) and 6 (i.e. after-group) will be compared. Furthermore, a process evaluation will be performed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antwerpen, Belgium, 2020
- ZNA Middelheim
-
-
Antwerpen
-
Brasschaat, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2930
- AZ KLINA Brasschaat
-
Edegem, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2650
- UZA
-
Merksem, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2170
- ZNA Jan Palfijn
-
Mol, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2400
- H. Hartziekenhuis Mol
-
-
Limburg
-
Sint-Truiden, Limburg, Belgium, 3800
- Sint-Trudo ziekenhuis Sint-Truiden
-
Tongeren, Limburg, Belgium, 3700
- AZ Vesalius Tongeren
-
-
Oost-Vlaanderen
-
Ronse, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium, 9600
- AZ Glorieux Ronse
-
-
Vlaams-Brabant
-
Vilvoorde, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 1800
- Az Jan Portaels Vilvoorde
-
-
West-Vlaanderen
-
Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium, 8310
- AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- A solid tumor and/or a haematological cancer
- Treated with one or more OACD (registered, "medical need" of "compassionate use")
- Able to swallow or retain oral medication
Exclusion Criteria:
- Following an adjuvant hormonal therapy with OACD (e.g. tamoxifen for 5 or 10 years)
- Following a therapy with a study drug in a phase I, II or III clinical trial
- Not able to understand Dutch
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Before-group
This arm comprises patients who are recruited in phase 3 of the study, i.e. before the implementation of the care pathway.
It is intended that patients included in phase 3 serve as a control-group for patients included in phase 6.
|
|
|
Experimental: After-group
This arm comprises patients who are recruited in phase 6 of the study, i.e. after the implementation of the care pathway.
|
A care pathway is a complex intervention for the mutual decision-making and organisation of care processes for a well-defined group of patients during a well-defined period.
Care pathways can be used to optimise care processes when problems arise on communication, coordination, standardisation and monitoring of care for a specific group of patients.
A care pathway for patients treated with OACD, should therefore consist of all relevant sustainable interventions that cover the continuum of the medicines' pathway with the aim to support self-management (e.g.
consultations with doctors, contact moments with nurses, telephone follow-up, ...).
The role of each stakeholder in the different interventions should be well-described including communication strategies between HCPs from primary and secondary care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in self-management
Time Frame: At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
The ability of an individual to manage the symptoms, treatment, physical and psychosocial consequences and life style changes due to his/her condition. Adequate self-management refers to the ability to monitor one's condition and to effect cognitive, behavioural and emotional responses necessary to maintain a satisfactory quality of life. Questionnaire/method: Patient Activation Measure (PAM) |
At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in adherence
Time Frame: At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Questionnaire/method: Probabilistic Medication Adherence Scale (ProMAS)
|
At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
|
Change in patients' experience with information on OACD
Time Frame: At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Questionnaire/method: Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS)
|
At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
|
Change in Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Questionnaire/method: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General
|
At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
|
Change in quality of patient-centred care
Time Frame: At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Questionnaire/method: CONTACT Patient-Centred Care Evaluation Questionnaire (PCCEQ)
|
At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in clinician's beliefs on self-management
Time Frame: At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Questionnaire/method: Clinician Support for Patient Activation Measure (CS PAM)
|
At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
|
Change in self-efficacy in HCPs
Time Frame: At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Questionnaire/method: Self-Efficacy and Performance in Self-management Support instrument (SEPSS-36)
|
At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
|
Change in interdisciplinary collaboration
Time Frame: At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Questionnaire/method: Clinician Staff Questionnaire (CSQ)
|
At baseline (before implementation of the care pathway); After 24 months (after implementation of the care pathway)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Veerle Foulon, Prof. Dr., KU Leuven
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- IK20082019
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Oncologic Disorders
-
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - AvianoRecruiting
-
ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary...Completed
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted
-
Institut de Cancérologie de LorraineCompleted
-
Associacao de Investigacao de Cuidados de Suporte...Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, E.P.E.; University Institute...CompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Oncologic DisordersPortugal
-
University Hospital, LilleNational Cancer Institute, France; Centre Oscar Lambret; University of Lille...CompletedTumor | Oncologic DisordersFrance
-
Nantes University HospitalNot yet recruitingReconstruction of Massive Bone Loss (Oncologic and Non-oncologic)France
-
Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale Reggio EmiliaCompletedOncologic ComplicationsItaly
-
University of Sao PauloNetherlands: Ministry of Health, Welfare and SportsCompletedOncologic Patients
Clinical Trials on Care pathway
-
European Pathway AssociationKU Leuven; University of Eastern PiedmontCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
-
European Pathway AssociationKU Leuven; University of Eastern PiedmontCompleted
-
European Pathway AssociationKU LeuvenCompleted
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalActive, not recruitingEncephalitis | Traumatic Brain Injury | Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain | Brain Hemorrhage | Stroke, Acute IschemicFinland
-
Medical College of WisconsinPediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network; Nemours Children's Health...RecruitingSickle Cell CrisisUnited States
-
University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity Hospital, Angers; Poitiers University Hospital; Union hospital, Toulouse and other collaboratorsWithdrawnObstructive Sleep Apnea | Obesity Hypoventilation SyndromeFrance
-
Dr. Kris VanhaechtKU Leuven; University of Eastern PiedmontCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease | Proximal Femur FractureBelgium
-
St Luke's Hospital, SingaporeNational University, SingaporeCompleted
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyThe Research Council of Norway; St. Olavs Hospital; Nordmøre and Romsdal Hospital... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand ParisRecruiting