Brain Power Spectral Density Under Propofol (PROBRAIN)

March 13, 2019 updated by: Joaquim MATEO

Brain Power Spectral Density Under Propofol and Its Association With Cerebral Fragility, an Objective Means to Estimate the Probability of Presenting Burst Suppression

In the operating room, the state of anesthesia is monitored during general anesthesia-induced hypnosis through EEG-based neuro-monitoring. Recent studies suggest that variables extracted from per-operative EEG change as brain ages. Furthermore, aging is itself an independant factor associated to an increased sensitivity to General Anesthesia (GA). Among fragility sign, per-operative Burst Suppression (BS) has been associated to a poor postoperative cognitive trajectory. The main goal of this observational clinical study is to extend the traditional use of per-operative EEG to the detection and prediction of various degrees of brain fragility, depending on the depth of anesthesia (DoA).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Main objective : Extend the traditional use of per-operative EEG to the detection and prediction of various degrees of brain fragility, depending on the depth of anesthesia (DoA).

Indices derived from the EEG signal, Spectral Edge Frequency 95 (SEF95), Patient State Index (PSI) and Bi-spectral Index (BIS) are now widely used in the operating room to monitor the Depth of Anesthesia (DoA). Recent studies suggest that variables extracted from per-operative EEG change as brain ages. A detailed reading of the quantitative EEG (qEEG) under GA has been recently described depending both on the specific drug used and patients' age. For GA induced with Propofol (2,6 di-isopropylphenol), a GABAergic receptor agonist used in Total Intra Venous Anesthesia (TIVA), the EEG signal under frontal derivations exhibits a specific signature characterized by a powerful alpha band. However, the elderly attenuates these EEG characteristics, which might be the results of a change in thalamic-cortical function and decreased neuronal excitability.

The goal of this observational clinical study is to assess the fragility of a patient under GA and based on the EEG SEF13 characteristics, weighted by the amount of Propofol administered.

Measures are based on EEG signal and subfrequency power spectral densities including alpha band as well as the amount of Propofol, each measured for EEG periods where SEF 95 = 8-13Hz.

Experimental design: This is a single-center, interventional, category I prospective study (minimal risks and constraints)

Population concerned : Patients eligible for interventional neuroradiology or orthopedic surgery performed under GA are selected to participate in this prospective, observational, single-center, routine care study. Patients will be included if they received, for a non-urgent scheduled procedure, a Total IntraVenous Administration (TIVA) anesthesia by Propofol according to the Schnider model combined with a morphine derivative. Minor patients, pregnant women and patients who refused to provide informed consent are excluded from the study. Patients with a BMI > 36 kg/m2 for whom the Schnider model is not validated are also excluded. Patient demographics will be collected during the anesthesia consultation. Total IntraVenous Anesthesia (TIVA) and Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) are used for morphine derivative and Propofol, EEG parameters will be collected from frontal electrodes montage (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F8).

Research Proceedings : Measures are based on EEG signal through routine EEG-based neuro-monitoring and subfrequency power spectral densities including alpha band as well as the amount of Propofol, each measured for EEG periods where SEF95 = 8-13Hz. Standard monitoring (Pulse Oxygen Saturation: SpO2, Heart Rate: HR, Systolic, Diastolic and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure: SBP, DBP, MAP, Temperature, End tidal CO2: (EtCO2) and electro-encephalogram monitoring by the Masimo Sedline monitor (SEF 95, PSI and BS) will be recorded.

General anesthesia is then induced in a standardized manner with a morphine followed by intra-venous administration of Propofol. All the measures are obtained non-invasively.

Individual benefit: There is no benefit for the patient

Collective benefit: Aging is associated to change in cerebral activity and it's crucial to distinguishes fragile patients from normal ones. The tailoring of doses according to the degree of "cerebral fragility" could predict poor postoperative cognitive or behavioral evolution.

Risks and minimal constraints added by the research: No added risk. The procedure is performed according to the usual protocol including routine EEG-based neuro-monitoring All the measures are obtained non-invasively.

For all patients whatever the comorbidities, anesthesia induction will be performed using a target-controlled infusion (Orchestra® Base Primea - Fresenius Kabi France). According to our standard of care, intra-operative episodes of hypotension (mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg or < 80% baseline) are treated by Norepinephrine bolus of 10 μg. For all patients, data from EEG-neuromonitoring and hemodynamic data are collected at the end of the procedure.

Number of selected subjects Selection of patients up to 60 analysable patients Number of Centre : 1 Research Agenda inclusion period: 12 months duration of participation (treatment + follow-up): duration of the interventional neuroradiology or orthopedic procedure: 1 day total duration: 12 months Number of planned inclusions by centre and month : 5 Number of subjects required : 60

Statistics The significance level used in this study chose as 0.05. The values is expressed in percentage for qualitative variables and median (InterQuartile Range: [IQR]) for quantitative variables. All parameters will be recorded and the brain total power spectral density (PT), alpha band power spectral density (Pα) and the Propofol TCI (µg/ml) will be calculated on the entire population. The median value of Pα,PT,PropofolTCI combination will be compared using non-parametric Kruskal Wallis and Man Whitney tests for quantitative data, while qualitative variable will be analyzed based on the Fisher's test. Research on the correlation between age and brain total power spectral is carried out by Pearson's test.

Then analysis will be also performed according to the occurrence of BS during induction of anesthesia. ROC curves will be constructed from univariate logistic régressions. For each univariate regression investigators provided Odd Ratios (OR) given with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and Areas Under the Curve (AUC). Multivariate analysis is finally performed with a logistic regression model where explanatory variables are chosen according to the results of the univariate analysis (p-value≤0.1).

The sample size calculation is based on the following assumptions : Assuming an incidence of 40% BS, with a power at 80% and an alpha risk at 5%, it is necessary to include 60 patients to highlight an area under the ROC curve of 80% with a confidence interval width of 0.1.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients > 18 years scheduled an elective interventional neuroradiology procedure or orthopedic surgery performed under general anesthesia

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years scheduled an elective interventional neuroradiology procedure or orthopedic surgery performed under general anesthesia.
  • oral agreement obtained from each patient before anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <18 years
  • an emergency procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Values of Patient State Index (PSI-) are collected from frontal electrodes montage (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F8)
Time Frame: Duration of the surgical intervention or interventional neuroradiology procedure (maximum 1 day)]]
For all patients values of Patient State Index (PSI -) will be collected during Total Anesthesia Period (induction and hypnotic periods)
Duration of the surgical intervention or interventional neuroradiology procedure (maximum 1 day)]]
Propofol doses administered with Target Controlled Infusion (TCI in µg/ml)
Time Frame: Duration of the surgical intervention or interventional neuroradiology procedure (maximum 1 day)]]
For all patients values of Target Controlled Infusion (TCI in µg/ml ) will be collected during Total Anesthesia Period (induction and hypnotic periods)
Duration of the surgical intervention or interventional neuroradiology procedure (maximum 1 day)]]
Values of Burst Suppression (in % of time) are collected from frontal electrodes montage (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F8)
Time Frame: Duration of the surgical intervention or interventional neuroradiology procedure (maximum 1 day)]]
For all patients values of Burst Suppression (in % of time) will be collected during Total Anesthesia Period (induction and hypnotic periods)
Duration of the surgical intervention or interventional neuroradiology procedure (maximum 1 day)]]
Values of the Spectral Edge Frequency (SEF 95 in uV2/Hz) are collected from frontal electrodes montage (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F8)
Time Frame: Duration of the surgical intervention or interventional neuroradiology procedure (maximum 1 day)]]
For all patients values of the Spectral Edge Frequency (SEF 95 in uV2/Hz) will be collected during Total Anesthesia Period (induction and hypnotic periods)
Duration of the surgical intervention or interventional neuroradiology procedure (maximum 1 day)]]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joaquim MATEO, MD, HLariboisiere LeTemple

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe