Comparison of Subjective Balance Tests

March 14, 2022 updated by: Ozden Ozkal, Hacettepe University

Comparison of Sensitivity of the Subjective Balance Tests

There is many subjective balance tests to evaluate static and dynamic balance. But, there is no sufficient information about which balance test is the most sensitive test to evaluate balance. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare of sensitivity of the subjective balance tests with an objective system.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In the clinical setting, many balance tests are used for evaluating balance in individuals. These tests are utilized to assess both static and dynamic balance. However, sufficient research has not been conducted to decide which subjective balance test is more sensitive than the other tests. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare of sensitivity of the subjective balance tests with an objective system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06100
        • Ozden Ozkal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years,
  • To be a volunteer to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • orthopedic problems affecting gait and stance
  • visual, auditory, orientational problems that could affect study results,
  • Walking with assist device
  • Having a neurological disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Group: Balance analysis
Balance will be assessed by Computerized Balance system and subjective balance tests.
Balance analysis is assessment method to estimate fall of risk and deterioration of postural control.
Other Names:
  • Functional Reach Test
  • Postural Sway test
  • Berg Balance Scale
  • Y Balance Test
  • Romberg Balance Test
  • One-Leg Stance Test
  • Tinetti Balance Test
  • Timed up an go test
Active Comparator: Control Group: Balance analysis
Balance will be assessed by Computerized Balance system and subjective balance tests.
Balance analysis is assessment method to estimate fall of risk and deterioration of postural control.
Other Names:
  • Functional Reach Test
  • Postural Sway test
  • Berg Balance Scale
  • Y Balance Test
  • Romberg Balance Test
  • One-Leg Stance Test
  • Tinetti Balance Test
  • Timed up an go test

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Limits of Stability
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Limits of stability test evaluates dynamic balance of participants. Computerized balance system measured limits of stability for forward, backward, right and left side movements. It calculates the maximum distance a person can lean without losing balance. The unit of measure is centimeters. The higher value is indicated the better balance
15 minutes
Postural Sway
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Postural sway in centimeters by computerized balance system
15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed up and go test
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Timed up and go test evaluates dynamic balance of participants. The timed up and go test measures the time that a patient needs to stand up from a chair, walk a 3-m distance, come back and sit back on the chair.Timed up and go test measure is second. The lower values indicates the better balance
15 minutes
Functional reach test
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Functional reach test evaluates dynamic balance by measuring the limits while the patient reaches forwards as far as possible. The test measure is centimeters. A higher score indicates better dynamic balance.
15 minutes
One-leg stance test
Time Frame: 15 minutes
One-leg stance test evaluates static balance of the participants. Participants would ask to maintain their static balance by standing one-lag stance. The test measure is second. A higher score indicated better static balance
15 minutes
Romberg test
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Romberg test is used to evaluate static balance. Participants would ask to maintain their balance with their feet together (touching each other). The test measure is second. Higher score indicated better balance.
15 minutes
Berg balance scale
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Berg balance scale is used for functional balance. participants are asked to perform 14 tasks frequently used in daily life activities. The highest possible score is 56 points. A higher score indicates better balance.
15 minutes
Balance scale
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Balance scale which is developed by Tinetti is used to evaluate functional balance. This test has a gait score and a balance score. It uses a 3-point ordinal scale of 0, 1 and 2. Gait is scored over 12 and balance is scored over 16 totalling 28. The lower the score on the scale, the higher the risk of falling.
15 minutes
Y balance test
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Y balance test is used to evaluate dynamic balance. The Y balance test has the patient stand on one leg while reaching out in 3 different directions with the other lower extremity. They are anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral. The test measures in centimeters. The higher score indicates better balance
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GO 19/29

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Balance

Clinical Trials on Limits of Stability

Subscribe