Laparoscopic Ischemic Conditioning Prior to Esophagectomy (ISCON)

February 17, 2026 updated by: Richard van Hillegersberg, UMC Utrecht

Laparoscopic Ischemic Conditioning Prior to Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer and Arterial Calcifications

This is a two center phase II prospective single-arm safety and feasibility trial for 20 patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma with an increased risk for anastomotic leakage, as based upon UCS and NASCET calcification scores on pre-op CT-scan. In these patients, laparoscopic ischemic conditioning is performed 12-18 days before an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. The primary outcome is all complications grade 2 and higher (Clavien-Dindo classification) occurring during or after the laparoscopic ischemic conditioning. Secondary outcomes are complications after the esophagectomy, and the induction of angiogenesis by biomarkers of microcirculation and redistribution of blood flow by measurement of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Anastomotic leakage is the most important surgical complication following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. A major cause of leakage is impaired healing due to ischemia of the gastric tube that is used for reconstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. Calcifications of the aorta or stenosis of the celiac trunk on pre-operative CT scan have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage. So far, no individualized treatment has been initiated for this selected group of patients. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning (ISCON) of the gastric tube aims to increase perfusion at the anastomotic site by redistribution of the gastric blood flow and/or induction of angiogenesis. This is achieved by occlusion of the supplying gastric arteries except for the right gastroepiploic artery during a separate intervention prior to esophagectomy. Of note, these arteries would also be occluded during conventional esophagectomy, but with laparoscopic ISCON they are occluded at an earlier moment in time during a separate intervention. Retrospective studies have demonstrated the safety of this technique. Prospective studies have not yet been performed.

Primary objective:

Assess the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic ISCON 12-18 days prior to esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with arterial calcifications.

Study design:

Two center phase II prospective single-arm safety and feasibility trial.

Study population:

Patients with resectable esophageal carcinoma (cT1-4a, N0-3, M0) with "major calcifications" of the thoracic aorta (UCS) and any additional calcification or stenosis of the celiac axis (modified NASCET score) on preoperative CT scan, who are planned to undergo esophagectomy.

Intervention:

Laparoscopic ISCON followed by esophagectomy after an interval of 12-18 days.

Primary outcome:

all complications grade 2 and higher (Clavien-Dindo classification) occurring during or after operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON) and before operation 2 (esophagectomy).

Secondary outcomes:

secondary outcomes with regard to operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON) are the duration of the procedure, blood loss, day of discharge postoperatively and grade 1 complications. Secondary outcomes with regard to operation 2 (esophagectomy) are anastomotic leakage rate, all other grade 3b or higher complications and 30 day mortality. Further secondary endpoints are the induction of angiogenesis by biomarkers of microcirculation and redistribution of blood flow by measurement of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

the additional burden for the patient consists of an extra operation of approximately 40 minutes during which laparoscopic ISCON will be performed, prior to the planned esophagectomy. We would classify the current study as medium risk. Potential benefits in comparison to current standard treatment are a reduced risk of anastomotic leakage and severity of anastomotic leakage. Potential risks are complications following operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON). Mainly, based upon prior experience, we expect gastroparesis to occur in 25% of patients. Patients with gastroparesis have an increased risk of aspiration and will require a stomach emptying by nasogastric tube and nasojejunal tube feeding till the performance of operating 2 (esophagectomy).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 50937
        • University Hospital of Cologne
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX
        • University Medical Center Utrecht

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Histologically proven adenocarcinoma (AC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ)
  • Planned to undergo transthoracic esophagectomy or transhiatal esophagectomy
  • Preoperative computed tomography (CT)
  • Vascular arterial changes: "major calcifications" of the thoracic aorta according to the "Uniform calcification score" (UCS) and or a stenosis of the celiac axis according to the "modified NASCET score". (Appendix 1 and 2) (7,17)
  • ASA I-III
  • European Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0,1 or 2
  • Age > 17
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • Not able to undergo study treatment.
  • Metastatic disease (M1)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning followed by esophagectomy
All included patients will receive a laparoscopic ischemic conditioning followed by an esophagectomy after an interval of 12-18 days.
All included patients will receive a laparoscopic ischemic conditioning followed by an esophagectomy after an interval of 12-18 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with a grade 2 or higher complication after laparoscopic ischemic conditioning
Time Frame: Occuring after operation 1(laparosocpic ISCON), but before operation 2 (esophagectomy). This time-frame is usually 13-15 days.
Complications grade 2 and higher (Clavien-Dindo classification)
Occuring after operation 1(laparosocpic ISCON), but before operation 2 (esophagectomy). This time-frame is usually 13-15 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with a grade 1 complication after operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON)
Time Frame: Occuring after operation 1(laparosocpic ISCON), but before operation 2 (esophagectomy). This time-frame is usually 13-15 days.
Grade 1 complications after operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON)
Occuring after operation 1(laparosocpic ISCON), but before operation 2 (esophagectomy). This time-frame is usually 13-15 days.
Duration of operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON)
Time Frame: During operation 1
Duration of operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON)
During operation 1
Bloodloss during operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON)
Time Frame: During operation 1
Bloodloss during operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON)
During operation 1
Day of discharge after operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON)
Time Frame: After operation 1, usually on the third post-operative day
Day of discharge after operation 1 (laparoscopic ISCON)
After operation 1, usually on the third post-operative day
Number of participants with anastomotic leakage after operation 2 (esophagectomy)
Time Frame: Within 30 days after operation 2
Anastomotic leakage after operation 2 (esophagectomy)
Within 30 days after operation 2
Number of participants with grade 3b or higher complications after operation 2 (esophagectomy)
Time Frame: Within 30 days after operation 2
Grade 3b (Clavien-Dindo classification) or higher complications after operation 2 (esophagectomy)
Within 30 days after operation 2
Number of participants with 30 day mortality after operation 2 (esophagectomy)
Time Frame: Within 30 days after operation 2
30 day mortality after operation 2 (esophagectomy)
Within 30 days after operation 2
Induction of angiogenesis in tissue
Time Frame: Biopsies are taken at the start, or within 24 hours of operation 1 and operation 2. In addition, the anastomoc donut or tip of gastric tube is collected during operation 2 (esophagectomy) after formation of the anastomosis.
Paraffin embedded sections (10µm) will be stained by immunohistochemistry against CD31 (vessel density) or smooth-muscle-actin positive pericytes to characterize vascularity
Biopsies are taken at the start, or within 24 hours of operation 1 and operation 2. In addition, the anastomoc donut or tip of gastric tube is collected during operation 2 (esophagectomy) after formation of the anastomosis.
Induction of angiogenesis by biomarkers of microcirculation
Time Frame: Peripheral blood is taken at the start, or within 24 hours of operation 1
A cytokine profile will be measured in the peripheral blood, consisting of VEGF, IL-8, IL-6, TNF-alpha and Ang-2
Peripheral blood is taken at the start, or within 24 hours of operation 1
Redistribution of blood flow by measurement of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography
Time Frame: During operation 1 and during operation 2 (esophagectomy)
Redistribution of blood flow by measurement of indocyanine green (ICG)
During operation 1 and during operation 2 (esophagectomy)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard van Hillegersberg, MD, PhD, University Medical Center Utrecht, dept. of Surgery
  • Principal Investigator: Wolfgang Schröder, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Cologne, department of Surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 11, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This will be published

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The protocol will be published in an international journal after the start of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The protocol will be accessibel from the journal in which it will be published

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe