Evaluation of Potential Development of Photoallergic Skin Reaction After Use of MC2-01 Cream

February 24, 2020 updated by: MC2 Therapeutics

A 6-Week, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Potential of MC2-01 Cream to Induce Photoallergic Skin Reaction in Healthy Subjects, Using a Controlled Photopatch Test Design

This trial is a 6-week, Randomized study evaluating the potential of MC2-01 Cream to induce a photoallergic skin reaction in Healthy subjects, using a controlled photopatch test design.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study evaluates the potential of MC2-01(CAL/BDP 0.005/0.064 w/w%) Cream to induce a photoallergic skin reaction. Because MC2-01 Cream is formulated for topical use and has shown to absorb light within the range of natural sunlight, it is necessary to determine the potential of this product to cause a photoallergic reaction after application to the skin.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • Fair Lawn, New Jersey, United States, 07410
        • TKL Research Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Is a healthy male or female
  • Is 18 years of age or older
  • Agree not to participate in any clinical or patch test studies at Day 1 through study completion
  • Females or childbearing potential must use a highly effective method of contraception for one month prior to Screening and until the end of study visit has been performed
  • In the case of a female of childbearing potential, has a negative urine pregnancy test on Day 1 prior to randomization and are willing to submit to a urine pregnancy test at the end of study
  • In the case of a female of childbearing potential, has had a hysterectomy or is postmenopausal
  • Is free of any systemic or dermatological disorder, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the study results or increase the risk of AEs.
  • Has uniformly-colored skin on the intrascapular region of the back which will allow discernment of erythema, and has Fitzpatrick skin types I, II or III
  • Complete a medical screening procedure
  • Read, understand and sign an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a history of photosensitivity or photoallergy
  • Has any visible skin disease at the application site which, in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the evaluation of the test site reaction
  • Current or past history of hypercalcemia, vitamin D toxicity, severe renal insufficiency or severe hepatic disorders
  • Is using systemic/topical corticosteroids within 3 weeks prior to and/or during the study or systemic/topical antihistamines 72 hours prior to and during the study
  • Is not willing to refrain from using systemic/topical anti-inflammatory analgesics (81 mg aspirin and occasional use of acetaminophen will be permitted)
  • Are taking medication known to cause phototoxic reaction
  • Is using medication which, in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the study results
  • Is unwilling or unable to refrain from the use of sunscreens, cosmetics, creams, ointments, lotions or similar products on the back during the study
  • Has psoriasis and/or atopic dermatitis/eczema
  • Has a known sensitivity or allergy to constituents of the materials being evaluated
  • Is a female who is pregnant, plans to become pregnant during the study, or is breast feeding a child
  • Has damaged skin in or around the test sites, including sunburn, excessively deep tans, uneven skin tones, tattoos, scars excessive hair, numerous freckles or other disfigurations of the test site
  • Has received treatment for any type of internal cancer within 5 years prior to study entry
  • Has a history of, or are currently being treated for skin cancer and/or hepatitis
  • Has a history or, or is currently being treated for diabetes
  • Has any condition that might compromise study results
  • Is expected to sunbathe or use tanning salons during the study
  • Has a history of adverse response to UV-sun lamps/sunlight exposure
  • Is currently participating in any clinical testing
  • Has any known sensitivity to adhesives
  • Has received any investigational drug(s) within 28 days from Day 1

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Induction:MC2-01 Cream, irradiation
Applications with MC2-01 Cream (calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate, w/w 0.005%/0.064%), followed by irradiation
Repeated applications of MC2-01 Cream (CAL/BDP, 0.005%/0.064%), followed by irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema, edema and other signs of cutaneous irritation
Experimental: Induction: MC2-01 Cream, no irradiation
Applications with MC2-01 Cream (calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate, w/w 0.005%/0.064%), no irradiation
Repeated applications of MC2-01 Cream, CAL/BDP, 0.005%/0.064%, no irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema, edema and other signs of cutaneous irritation
Experimental: Induction: MC2-01 vehicle, irradiation
Applications with MC2-01 vehicle, followed by irradiation
Repeated applications of MC2-01 cream, followed by irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema, edema and other signs of cutaneous irritation
Experimental: Induction: MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation
Applications with MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation
Repeated applications of MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema, edema and other signs of cutaneous irritation
Experimental: Challenge: MC2-01 Cream, irradiation
Application with MC2-01 Cream (calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate, w/w 0.005%/0.064%), followed by irradiation
Single application of MC2-01 Cream (CAL/BDP, 0.005%/0.064%), followed by irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema
Experimental: Challenge: MC2-01 Cream, No irradiation
Application with MC2-01 Cream (calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate, w/w 0.005%/0.064%), no irradiation
Single application of MC2-01 Cream (CAL/BDP, 0.005%/0.064%), no irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema
Experimental: Challenge: MC2-01 vehicle, irradiation
Application with MC2-01 vehicle, followed by irradiation
Single application of MC2-01 vehicle, followed by irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema
Experimental: Challenge: MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation
Application with MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation
Single application of MC2-01 vehicle, no irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema
Experimental: Challenge: Control, irradiation
No application, but irradiation
No application, but irradiation. Visual evaluation of application site using a visual scale that rated the degree of erythema and edema

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Within-subject Comparison of Dermal Reaction by the Overall Numeric Rating of Erythema and Edema at 5 Defined Test Sites, After Application of MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 Vehicle or Untreated at Defined Test Sites, Followed by Irradiation.
Time Frame: 24 hours

After an induction phase, where subjects were treated with MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and irradiation, the challenge phase was initiated.

MC2-01 Cream and MC2-01 vehicle was applied to each two naive test sites. Another naive test site was untreated. 24 hours after product application, one of each test site (MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle) + the untreated site were irradiated. Possible changes in dermal reaction (erythema and edema) was evaluated at all 5 test sites 24, 48 and 72 hours post-irradiation and these evaluations are the outcome measure of the study.

The following visual scores was used to express the response observed at each timepoints: Erythema: 0-3 where 0 represents no reaction and 3 represents marked/severe erythema. Edema: 0-2 where 0 represents no reaction and 2 represents definite edema with erosion/vesiculation. The diagnosis of photosensitization response will be made by the investigator based on review of the scored skin responses of both erythema and edema.

24 hours
Within-subject Comparison of Dermal Reaction by the Overall Numeric Rating of Erythema and Edema at 5 Defined Test Sites, After Application of MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 Vehicle or Untreated at Defined Test Sites, Followed by Irradiation.
Time Frame: 48 hours

After an induction phase, where subjects were treated with MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and irradiation, the challenge phase was initiated.

MC2-01 Cream and MC2-01 vehicle was applied to each two naive test sites. Another two naive test sites were untreated. 24 hours of product application, one of each test site (MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and untreated) were irradiated.

Possible changes in dermal reaction (erythema and edema) was evaluated at all 6 test sites, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-irradiation and these evaluations are the outcome measure of the study. The following visual scores was used to express the response observed at each timepoints: Erythema: 0-3 where 0 represents no reaction and 3 represents marked/severe erythema. Edema: 0-2 where 0 represents no reaction and 2 represents definite edema with erosion/vesiculation. The diagnosis of photosensitization response will be made by the investigator based on review of the scored skin responses of both erythema and edema.

48 hours
Within-subject Comparison of Dermal Reaction by the Overall Numeric Rating of Erythema and Edema at 5 Defined Test Sites, After Application of MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 Vehicle or Untreated at Defined Test Sites, Followed by Irradiation.
Time Frame: 72 hours

After an induction phase, where subjects were treated with MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and irradiation, the challenge phase was initiated.

MC2-01 Cream and MC2-01 vehicle was applied to each two naive test sites. Another two naive test sites were untreated. 24 hours of product application, one of each test site (MC2-01 Cream, MC2-01 vehicle and untreated) were irradiated. Possible changes in dermal reaction (erythema and edema) was evaluated at all 6 test sites, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-irradiation and these evaluations are the outcome measure of the study.

The following visual scores was used to express the response observed at each timepoints: Erythema: 0-3 where 0 represents no reaction and 3 represents marked/severe erythema. Edema: 0-2 where 0 represents no reaction and 2 represents definite edema with erosion/vesiculation. The diagnosis of photosensitization response will be made by the investigator based on review of the scored skin responses of both erythema and edema.

72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan S Dosik, MD, TKL Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 13, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Single site study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Photoallergy

Clinical Trials on Induction: Application of MC2-01 Cream, irradiation

3
Subscribe