Comparative Effectiveness of Social Physical Play and Traditional Exercise Programming (PlayFit)

May 6, 2024 updated by: Christopher Sciamanna, MD, MPH, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
This study will compare the impact of traditional group fitness versus a game-based fitness program, designed to maximize enjoyment, on physical fitness.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Fewer than 1 in 10 middle-aged US adults get the recommended amount of aerobic physical activity (PA), greatly increasing their chances of heart disease and stroke. There are over 50 million adults with fitness center memberships, which are used only once per month and, after joining new programs, people quickly stop coming. While many barriers to PA have been cited (e.g., time, cost), the investigators believe that a key, modifiable, and underappreciated barrier is that most adults simply do not enjoy physical activity enough to do it regularly. Studies consistently observe that people who enjoy physical activity more are more likely to be more active in the future. Despite this consistent observation, the investigators are not aware of studies that ask "Would an adult PA program designed to maximize enjoyment increase PA adherence and fitness?". In 2015, our team set out to design an exercise program for adults that maximized enjoyment. Taking inspiration from Pickleball, a popular game of modified tennis, our team created PlayFit. PlayFit is an exercise program in which adults come together three times each week to play a range of sports, all modified to 1) reduce effort (e.g., smaller playing area), 2) reduce injuries (e.g., lightweight low-pressure balls) and 3) reduce competitiveness (e.g., teams chosen randomly, minimize physical contact, no keeping score). Pilot work in the summer of 2016 with 22 adults identified five modified sports that all had Metabolic Equivalent (MET) levels between 5.5 and 6.5 and high satisfaction scores (average of 8.0 out of 10). More importantly, the comments suggest that the investigators have created a social, enjoyable experience: "that was SO much fun", "I've never had so much fun playing soccer". People liked "the laughter during the games", "no pressure, not competitive" and that "it's not about ability, it's just about having fun with people".

In this study, the investigators initially proposed testing whether PlayFit would lead to greater fitness gains, compared to group fitness, to help providers understand in a way that helps providers and fitness center staff understand: "What exercise program should I recommend to promote long-term adherence and fitness?". All subjects were to be expected to exercise three-times weekly for 60 minutes for 12 months. The investigators planned to randomly assign 360 adults to two conditions: 1) Group Fitness activities and 2) PlayFit. The investigators hypothesized that both PlayFit and Group Fitness would increase Maximum Oxygen Uptake (V02max) significantly at 6 months but, after 12 months, mediated by greater enjoyment and higher adherence, participants randomized to PlayFit would have greater fitness and activity gains at 12 months than Group Fitness. The results of this study would have the potential to help patients, providers and fitness center directors by answering the question: "What exercise program should be recommended to sedentary adults in order to promote long-term adherence and fitness?"

Although we originally intended for data collection to conclude by 2021, human-subjects research was largely prohibited throughout 2020 due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Near the end of 2020 we began to conduct outdoor-only activities. Indoor human-subjects research continued to be restricted throughout 2020 and early 2021.

Once large-scale research restrictions were lifted, recruitment and baseline testing resumed in May 2021, with the first new cohorts beginning in their respective sessions in August 2021. Unfortunately, all human-subjects research was again prohibited for approximately 45 days during January and February 2022. For several reasons, including the likely deconditioning of participants during the pause, that several participants responded that they were unwilling or fearful to return given the perceived health risks, and that some community partners were no longer willing to host the PA sessions during the pandemic, we concluded that our best course of action was to analyze data up to the most recent measurement timepoint preceding this 45-day mandated pause in data collection (month 3).

This decision meant that we were unable to test our original hypotheses. For example, only baseline cardiorespiratory fitness and accelerometry data were available, as the second time point to collect these data was to occur at month 6. However, analyses for group session adherence were possible, as these data were collected continuously throughout the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

431

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18+
  • Sedentary (<90 minutes of self-reported moderate-vigorous activity each week)
  • Health care provider must give permission.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of heart disease, stroke or chest pain.
  • Participating in another research study involving physical activity or weight loss.
  • Planning to have surgery or move in the next year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group Fitness
Subjects will be offered several sessions per week of a traditional group fitness program led by a trained group leader.
Traditional Group Fitness consisting of aerobic and strength exercises performed in a group setting and led by a trained instructor.
Active Comparator: PlayFit
Subjects will be offered several sessions per week of a modified sports fitness program, led by a trained group leader.
Modified sports fitness exercise program consisting of games played in groups and led by a trained instructor.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Session Attendance
Time Frame: Duration of participation in study, up to 1 year
Adherence to the intervention sessions was collected by the PlayFit and Group Fitness group leaders during each session using a REDCap attendance survey.
Duration of participation in study, up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minutes of Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)
Time Frame: 12 months
Minutes of Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) will be measured using an Actigraph GT3X tri-axial accelerometer, which can measure the intensity of PA and the frequency/pattern of activity over time.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body weight
Time Frame: 12 months
Body weight in kilograms will be measured by a research assistant using a calibrated stadiometer.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Sciamanna, MD, MPH, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 29, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HL142679
  • R33HL142679 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Final, clean, data filed will be uploaded to a publicly available site (e.g., ISPSR), within 12 months of finishing study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 12 months of completing the final follow-up visit on the last study subject.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Group Fitness (Traditional)

Clinical Trials on Group Fitness

Subscribe