Anesthesia Tumescent for Surgical Management of Tenosynovitis.

April 25, 2019 updated by: CLOTILDE FUENTES OROZCO, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Efficacy of Tumescent Local Anesthesia in the Surgical Management of Tenosynovitis.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the tumescent anesthesia technique in the surgical management of hand tenosynovitis. For this, an open clinical trial was conducted, which included patients with hand tenosynovitis (carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger and Quervain syndrome), which were randomly assigned to a group. The control group was released pulleys and ligaments with local anesthetic technique and hemostasis with pneumatic tourniquet; While the study group was released from the pulleys and ligaments with tumescent anesthesia. The study variables were: anesthesia time, trans-surgical bleeding, pain, total procedure time and tissue reperfusion time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction: The WALANT technique (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No-Torniquet) proposes the use of local anesthesia, epinephrine and tourniquet in the areas of the hand to be repaired, making costs and time and comfort more efficient.

Objective: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the WALANT technique versus regional anesthesia with tourniquet in pain control, surgical management of stenosing tenosynovitis.

Material and methods: Open clinical trial including patients with the trigger finger, tunnel syndrome in the operating room, candidates for surgery, and excluding previous surgeries at the site of the injury, hemodynamic instability, peripheral vascular diseases, smoking, anxiety, or psychiatric diseases. The anesthetic method was applied to the incision sites according to the diagnosis and the proposed procedure. At the end of the test, tumescent solution and control, 1% lidocaine plus pneumatic tourniquet on the forearm at 250mmHg. The main variables were: type of anesthesia and pain during the procedure. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied (xi2, t-student or Mann-Whitney U).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jalisco
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44340
        • Western Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right holders of the Mexican Social Security Institute
  • Over 18 years
  • Trigger Finger Diagnosis
  • Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  • Diagnosis of Quervain Syndrome
  • Acceptance and signature of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Necessity for concomitant surgery
  • Previous surgeries on the injured site
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • History of peripheral vascular diseases
  • Do not wish to participate in the study
  • Hypersensitivity to medication
  • Smoking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tumescent anesthesia
A tumescent solution was prepared; consisting of 40 cc of 0.9% Saline Solution, 10 cc of 2% Lidocaine, 0.4 cc of Epinephrine (1: 1000) and 4 cc of 7.5% Sodium Bicarbonate. This solution was applied in the incision sites according to the diagnosis and the proposed procedure. In case of trigger finger, 3 cc was applied subcutaneously in the proximal palmar crease of the affected finger; for Quervain syndrome, 5 to 6 cc of tumescent solution was injected along the first extensor compartment at the radial styloid level; and in the case of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, 10 cc of tumescent solution was infiltrated on the flexor retinaculum in the subcutaneous tissue and from 7 to 10 cc below it. Subsequently, 20 minutes were waited for the epinephrine to cause vasoconstriction, and the asepsis of the limb was continued , sterile fields were placed, the incision site was corroborated and the surgical procedure proposed for each pathology was started.
A tumescent solution is prepared with 2% lidocaine (10ml), 1:1000 epinephrine (0.4ml) and 7.5% sodium bicarbonate (4ml) dissolved in 0.9% saline solution (40ml) and applied from 3 to 20ml (depending on the pathology to be repaired) at the incision site.
Standard surgical procedure for carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger and Quervain syndrome.
Active Comparator: Local anesthesia with tourniquet.

Lidocaine 1% was applied to the incision sites according to the diagnosis and the proposed procedure. In case of trigger finger, 3 cc was applied subcutaneously in the proximal palmar crease of the affected finger; for Quervain syndrome, 5 to 6 cc were injected along the first extensor compartment at the radial styloid level; and in the case of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, 10 cc was infiltrated on the flexor retinaculum in the subcutaneous tissue and from 7 to 10 cc below it. Afterwards, a pneumatic tourniquet was placed at the level of the forearm at 250 mmHg after exsanguination with a bandage from Esmarch. The asepsis of the limb was continued, sterile fields were placed, the incision site was corroborated and the surgical procedure proposed for each pathology was started.

At the end of the surgical procedure, it was closed by planes, a soft bandage was placed, the tourniquet was removed and the patient was taken to recovery.

Standard surgical procedure for carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger and Quervain syndrome.
Apply 3 to 20 ml at the incision site, depending on the pathology to be repaired(carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger or Quervain syndrome).
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine 1%
Level of the forearm at 250 mmHg, after exsanguination with Esmarch bandage.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure pain: Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: immediate post surgery
Evaluated by Visual Analog Scale, A subjective psychometric response scale used to measure distinct behavioral or physiological phenomena based on linear numerical gradient, with values from 0 to 10. In the value 0 the absence or less intensity is located and in 10 the greater intensity of pain.
immediate post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding
Time Frame: immediate post surgery
Bleeding estimated in consensus between anesthesiologist and surgeon, based on the gauze used during surgery
immediate post surgery
Anesthesia application time
Time Frame: at the beginning of the application of anesthesia
The interval of time in minutes that is required to apply the anesthetic method chosen in the area to be used
at the beginning of the application of anesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Clotilde Fuentes Orozco, PhD, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 8, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe