Holmium Laser Versus Thulium Laser Versus Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate.

September 18, 2021 updated by: Fady kamal Ghobrial, Mansoura University

Holmium Laser Versus Thulium Laser Versus Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate for Treatment of Large Sized Benign Prostatic Enlargement. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Because of the diversity of the studies and deficiency of those comparing various techniques of EEP for treatment of LUTs secondary to BPO in patients with large sized prostate, we aim in this study at testing the non-inferiority of PKEP and ThuLEP to HoLEP in relieving LUTs secondary to BPO in patients prostate size >80ml. Our hypothesis is to present an evidence that enucleation is a technique rather than a power dependent procedure through a RCT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

155

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35516
        • Urology and nephrology center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

48 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients' age >50 years
  • Lower urinary tract symptoms LUTS secondary benigh prostatic obstruction BPO who failed medical treatment
  • International prostate symptom scores (IPSS) >15 and bother score quality of life (QOL) > 3 (according to IPSS question 8)
  • Maximum urinary flow rate (Q max) <15 ml/sec with at least 150 ml voided volume or cases with acute urine retention secondary to BPO who failed trial of voiding on medical treatment.
  • Transrectal ultrasound TRUS estimated total prostate size 80-250cc

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with neurological disorder which might affect bladder function as cerebrovascular stroke, Parkinson disease
  • Active urinary tract infection (positive urine culture) till treatment
  • Presence of bladder cancer (within the last 2 years)
  • Known prostate cancer patients will be excluded preoperatively on the basis of digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen level, and TRUS imaging followed by prostate biopsies if necessary.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Holmium Laser
holmium laser enucleation of the prosteate
Holmium laser enucleation of large sized prostate
Other Names:
  • HoLEP
Active Comparator: Thulium Laser
Thulium laser enucleation of the prosteate
Thulium laser enucleation of large sized prostate
Other Names:
  • ThuLEP
Active Comparator: Bipolar Enucleation
Bipolar enucleation of the prosteate
Bipolar enucleation of large sized prostate
Other Names:
  • Bipolar enucleation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
urinary functional outcomes using uroflowmetry
Time Frame: 2 years
assessed by maximum flow rate (Q-max) measured using uroflowmetry by ml/sec, better outcome above 15ml/sec
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient symptoms
Time Frame: 2 years
assessed by international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) questionnaire, better outcome score below 9
2 years
perioperative complications
Time Frame: 2 years
assessed by clavien dindo score
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Hypertrophy

Clinical Trials on Holmium Laser

3
Subscribe