Combined Use of a Respiratory Broad Panel Multiplex PCR and Procalcitonin to Reduce Antibiotics Exposure in Hospitalized Sickle-cell Adults With Acute Chest Syndrome. (Antibio_STA)

Combined Use of a Respiratory Broad Panel Multiplex PCR and Procalcitonin to Reduce Antibiotics Exposure in Adult Patients With Sickle-cell Disease Hospitalized for Acute Chest Syndrome. A Bi-centric, Open, Parallel-group, Randomized Controlled Study

Many patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) may develop Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS). ACS is usually caused by a Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) which may be caused by either a bacterium or a virus. Antibiotics are usually used for 7 to 10 days with no microbiological workup.

The hypothesis of the study is that the identification of the microorganisms might lead to a reduction of antibiotics exposure and a better care of the patients.

We speculate that an early pathogen-directed strategy (respiratory broad panel multiplex PCR and early antibiotics interruption based on the PCT values decrease) might reduce the antibiotics exposure in SCD patients with ACS who are hospitalized and for whom an antibiotic treatment is indicated, as compared with usual care

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) is a frequent and severe acute complication of sickle-cell disease. It may affect 10 to 20% of hospitalized patients and is the leading cause of death. The symptoms combine a new pulmonary infiltrate and symptom(s) among fever, cough, dyspnea, expectoration, chest pain and crackles. The pathophysiology of ACS is complex and there are many interlinked aetiologies.

Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is one of the most frequent aetiologies of ACS. Intracellular bacteria (Chlamydia, Mycoplasma), respiratory virus (especially respiratory syncytial virus) and pyogenes (Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) are the most frequently identified microorganisms. Nevertheless, the clinical presentation of ACS is not helpful for the diagnosis of LRTI; the respiratory tract samples are not always collected, either because the patients do not expectorate or because the benefit-risk ratio of a fiberoptic bronchoscopy may be not advantageous. Moreover, usual diagnostic test are not enough performant.

The current practices rely on the systematic administration of antibiotics for 7 to 10 days. The efficacy and safety of alternative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have never been evaluated in controlled clinical trial to cure ACS.

In this context, the optimisation of the microbiological documentation of ACS might enhance the use of antimicrobial drugs, reduce their duration, and limit the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria.

Therefore, we speculate that an early pathogen-directed strategy (respiratory broad panel multiplex PCR and early antibiotics interruption based on the PCT values decrease) might reduce the antibiotics exposure in SCD patients with ACS who are hospitalized and for whom an antibiotic treatment is indicated, as compared with usual care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Service de Réanimation et USC médico-chirurgicale

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Sickle Cell Disease patients with ACS with an antibiotic therapy indication
  • Signed and informed consent
  • Affiliated with social security

Exclusion Criteria:

Documented extra-pulmonary bacterial infection at the time of inclusion;

  • Patients who received antibiotics for more than 24 hours before the diagnosis of ACS (during the primary hospitalization)
  • Known severe immunosuppression (AIDS, neutropenia (<1000 PNN), hematology, solid tumor under chemotherapy, transplanted organ); long-term treatment with hydroxy-carbamide is not considered
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Person deprived of liberty or under legal protection;
  • Participation in another interventional study of type Jardé 1

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control
usual antibiotic treatment
usual antibiotic treatment
Experimental: Intervention
targeted antibiotic treatment according to the results of PCR multiplex
The actions or procedures added by the research are the realization of a nasopharyngeal swab in the two strategies, and the PCT assay at D1, D3 and D7 in the pathogen-directed strategy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
to compare the antibiotics exposure at 28 days (D28) after the diagnosis of ACS between the two strategies
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of microbiological documentation of ACS
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Survival at 28 days
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
occurrence of a secondary bacterial respiratory infection or any other secondary infection at 28 days
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
transfusion and exchange transfusion at 28 days
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
ICU and hospital lengths of stay
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Readmission rate in hospital at 28 days
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Transfer to ICU at 28 days (D28) after the diagnosis of ACS between the two strategies
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Global use of antibiotics at 28 days
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Time to clinical stability at 28 days
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muriel FARTOUKH, PU-PH, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sickle Cell Disease

Clinical Trials on Control: usual antibiotic treatment

3
Subscribe