- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03959111
Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Pain
February 19, 2026 updated by: Jian Kong, Massachusetts General Hospital
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Pain
This proposal aims to investigate the treatment effect and underlying mechanism of transcutaneous acupuncture stimulation on chronic low back pain.
We believe that this study, if successful, will provide new treatment options for chronic low back pain, reduce the use of opioid analgesics in chronic pain management, and enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanism of nerve stimulation treatment, as well as the pathophysiology and development of chronic pain.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
70
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
- Massachusetts General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Volunteers 18-65 years of age.
- Meet the Classification Criteria of chronic LBP (having low back pain for more than 6 months), as determined by a referring physician.
- Received stable treatment or no treatment in the past month.
- At least a 10th grade English-reading level. English can be a second language provided that the patients feel they understand all the questions used in the assessment measures.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Specific causes of back pain (e.g., epidural abscess, compression fracture, spondyloarthropathy, malignancy, cauda equina syndrome) or radicular pain, radiculopathy, or spinal canal stenosis. Complicated back problems (e.g., prior back surgery, medico-legal issues).
- Presence of headache/migraine, as well as widespread body pain such as fibromyalgia.
- The intent to undergo surgery during participation in the study.
- History of cardiac, respiratory, or nervous system disease that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes participation in the study because of a heightened potential for adverse outcomes (e.g., asthma or claustrophobia).
- Presence of any contraindications to MRI scanning (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, metal implants, fear of enclosed spaces, pregnancy, cannot lie still in fMRI scanner).
- Conditions that might confound longitudinal effects or interpretation of results (e.g. severe fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis).
- Pregnant or lactating.
- Conditions making study participation difficult (e.g., paralysis, psychoses, or other severe psychological problems as per the judgment of a study investigator during Session 1).
- Active substance abuse disorders within the last 24 months (based on subject self-report).
- Use of prescription steroids for pain during the past six months.
- Presence of any other acute or chronic pain disorder.
- Any medical conditions, such as peripheral neuropathy, that could affect the results of QST.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ear stimulation (Location 1)
|
Stimulation parameters will include 1) density wave adjusted to 20Hz with less than 1 ms pulse width, 2) intensity adjusted based on the tolerance of the patient (moderate tolerable stimulation without pain), and 3) treatment will be applied 1 time per day, 5 times per week for four weeks (on-site tVNS treatment plus self-administration at home).
|
|
Experimental: Ear stimulation (Location 2)
|
Stimulation parameters will include 1) density wave adjusted to 20Hz with less than 1 ms pulse width, 2) intensity adjusted based on the tolerance of the patient (moderate tolerable stimulation without pain), and 3) treatment will be applied 1 time per day, 5 times per week for four weeks (on-site tVNS treatment plus self-administration at home).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Low Back Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 1 month
|
This is a uni-dimensional measure of chronic low back pain intensity.
It uses an 11-point numeric scale (0 indicate no pain, and 10 indicates max level of pain that can be imagined).
We will use it to measure the patient's average pain intensity in the past week, which will be measured at the beginning and end of the study.
|
1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: 1 months
|
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a widely used self-reported measure of physical disability specifically designed for individuals with low back pain.
The questionnaire assesses the impact of back pain on daily activities.
The total score ranges from 0 to 24, where: 0 indicates no disability, 24 indicates severe disability.
|
1 months
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores
Time Frame: baseline and post-treatment
|
The PROMIS, funded by the NIH, is a system containing reliable, flexible, precise, and responsive assessment tools that have been widely validated in numerous samples.
29 items covering seven domains and one additional question about pain intensity.
Here we focus on Pain Interference (4 items, raw score range 4-20, T-score range roughly 41-76, mean and SD in chronic pain patients is 67.1 and 5.79.
The 67.1indicates the population mean in chronic pain patients with a standard deviation of 5.79 based on publication PMCID: PMC8412832).
Higher T-scores = more pain interference.
We compared pre- and post-treatment difference of the pain interference subscore.
|
baseline and post-treatment
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: baseline and post-treatment
|
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 15-item questionnaire assessing the extent to which individuals magnify the threat of pain and feel helpless in the presence of pain.
Due to an administration error, the full 15-item PCS was not collected as intended: participants received an incomplete version of the questionnaire (missing items), which prevents calculation of valid total and subscale scores.
This error occurred during data collection and affected all attempted administrations (including both planned time points, where applicable); therefore, no participants have analyzable PCS data to report for this outcome measure.
|
baseline and post-treatment
|
|
The Pennebaker Inventory of Limbic Languidness
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Pennebaker Inventory of Limbic Languidness (PILL) is a self-report questionnaire assessing the frequency of common physical symptoms.
Participants rate how often they have experienced each symptom over a specified retrospective period using a 5-point Likert scale.
The PILL includes a broad range of symptoms, including pain-related items (e.g., headache, back pain, sore muscles).
The PILL was administered at baseline only to characterize baseline symptom sensitivity/awareness and to reduce participant burden.
Total scores are computed as the sum of 53 items rated from 1-5 (total score range: 53-265), with higher scores indicating more frequent symptoms (worse outcome) and lower scores indicating less frequent symptoms (better outcome).
|
Baseline
|
|
Resting State Functional Connectivity Changes of the PAG
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Resting state functional connectivity refers to the statistical relationship between the time-series activity of different brain regions as measured by functional MRI (fMRI).
Functional connectivity changes of the periaqueductal gray (PAG) at rest refer to alterations in the neural communication between the PAG and other brain regions when a subject is not actively engaged in a task.
The PAG, located in the midbrain, plays a critical role in pain modulation, defensive behavior, and autonomic regulation.
|
1 month
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Medial and Lateral Hypothalamus
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Resting state functional connectivity refers to the statistical relationship between the time-series activity of different brain regions as measured by functional MRI (fMRI).
Functional connectivity changes of the medial and lateral hypothalamus at rest refer to alterations in the neural communication between the two regions and other brain regions when a subject is not actively engaged in a task.
|
1 month
|
|
CBF as Measured by ASL
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Changes in cerebral blood flow were evaluated by comparing pre-to-post change between the real and sham groups.
Statistically significant clusters identified in this comparison are reported in the Results Data Tables, including a cluster located in the precentral gyrus.
|
1 month
|
|
Inflammation Biomarkers
Time Frame: 1 month
|
Changes in inflammatory biomarker levels of PD1 between baseline and week 4
|
1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jian Kong, Massachusetts General Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 17, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 30, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
April 30, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 20, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
May 22, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 11, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 19, 2026
Last Verified
February 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2016P000678
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.