Compliance With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol (ERAS) in Surgical Patients

February 14, 2022 updated by: Efrain Riveros Perez, MD, Augusta University

Evaluation of Compliance With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in Benign Gynecological Surgical Patients

The concept of "enhanced recovery" was introduced by European anesthesiologists and surgeons who challenged traditional clinical practices involved in peri-operative care in 1990s. The goal of enhanced recovery programs (ERP) is to maintain normal physiology thereby decreasing complications. It focuses on peri-operative optimization of patient care. It was originally created for open colorectal surgeries but now has shown benefit in various surgical specialities including thoracic surgery, vascular surgery, hepatobiliary as well as gynecological surgery.

The successful implementation of structured ERAS program requires an ERAS protocol, audit system and a multidisciplinary team. The investigators will evaluate the effect of compliance with the protocol and outcomes such as length of stay, readmissions, morbidity and mortality.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

After approval by the Institutional Review Board, the investigators plan to retrospectively study gynecological patients who underwent ERAS protocol at Augusta University Medical Center between January 2017 and February 2019.

This is a retrospective observational study to evaluate the outcomes of patients who had ERAS protocol during their surgery.

Demographic and outcome variables will be obtained from the institutional health documentation system. The investigators will collect demographic variables (age, ASA status), morphometric measurements (body mass index), time from enrollment to ERAS protocol, hospitalization length of stay, and readmission rate. The investigators will also record the documentation of the ERAS protocol interventions against the ERAS protocol approved by the institution. The investigators will assess the effect of the degree of compliance on outcome variables.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Recruiting
        • Augusta University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients scheduled for benign gynecologic surgery who underwent ERAS protocol

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All elective benign gynecological surgical patients enrolled under ERAS protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of oncologic pathologies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Gynecological surgery with ERAS protocol
Patients scheduled for benign gynecological surgery under ERAS protocol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Days from surgery to discharge from the hospital
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Readmission
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Admission to hospital after discharge
2 weeks
Mortality
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Number of fatalities after surgery
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Efrain Riveros Perez, MD, Augusta University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1396793

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Subscribe