Aortic Valve Replacement Above the Aortic Annulus (SA-AVR) With the Carpentier-Edwards Magna-Ease Bioprosthesis (SA-AVR)

June 5, 2019 updated by: Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue

Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement: Surgical Techniques and Early Outcomes

Surgical valve replacement is commonly performed in patients with severe aortic valve disease. In small aortic annulus, implantation of bioprosthetic valves can be associated with limited functional capacity. To avoid this condition, we changed our surgical technique to implant a larger bioprosthesis. Briefly, the prosthesis is sutured to the aortic annulus along the left and right coronary sinuses, and in a supraannular position along the noncoronary sinus, therefore allowing us to insert a prosthetic valve with a one-size larger diameter than the native aortic annulus.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for severe aortic valve disease. Bioprosthesis remains the substitute of choice for elderly patients. However, it may be associated with patient-prosthesis mismatch particularly for patients with small aortic annulus. Moreover, "valve-in-valve" transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a suitable therapeutic option for bioprosthesis structural degeneration, especially in patients with high surgical risk. It is therefore of great importance to implant the widest bioprosthesis as possible at the first AVR. The investigators report a surgical technique allowing the implantation of a larger bioprosthesis in patients with small aortic annulus: the supra-annular aortic valve replacement (SA-AVR) above the aortic annulus. The investigators analyzed the postoperative outcomes of the SA-AVR technique using the Perimount Magna Ease (Carpentier-Edwards, Irvine, California) bioprosthesis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

117

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Le Plessis-Robinson, France, 92350
        • Hopital Marie Lannelongue

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement in our institution

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients older than 18 years who underwent a suprannular implantation of the Carpentier Edwards Magna Ease bioprosthetic valve between January 2010 and December 2017 in our institution, whatever the aetiology of the aortic valve disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients younger than 18 years, patients who received a different bioprosthesis valve in the aortic position, patients who were lost of follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
SA-AVR group
Patients who underwent the supra-annular aortic valve replacement (SA-AVR) technique in our institution between December 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.
After median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established between the ascending aorta and the right atrium. The aorta was cross-clamped and a high potassium warm cardioplegia was infused and repeated every 15 minutes. The aortotomy was made above the sinuses and the aortic valve was removed. The prosthesis was chosen one size larger than the maximal sizer that could be inserted, which was also used to determine the appropriate height for insertion of the sutures along the wall of the non-coronary sinus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: Hospital discharge, an average 10 days
Hospital discharge, an average 10 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional status
Time Frame: 1 year after the surgery
New York Heart Association functional class (from I to IV)
1 year after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Elie Fadel, MD PhD, Marie Lannelongue Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TPS 59185

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Disease

Clinical Trials on aortic valve replacement

Subscribe