Comparison of Two Techniques of Combination Therapy for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

March 8, 2021 updated by: Joseph Adame

To study the effects of two combination therapies for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have been both intolerant to Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) therapy and sub-therapeutic to oral appliance therapy.

Hypothesis

1. There is a difference between Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) vs CPAP/Oral Appliance (OA) connect vs CPAP/OA disconnected in terms of:

  1. Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) reduction
  2. Amount of side effects
  3. Amount of Leaks
  4. Hours of use (compliance)
  5. CPAP pressure

2. There is a difference between connected and disconnected for the following symptoms:

  1. Epworth sleepiness Scale (ESS)
  2. Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ)
  3. Side effects Study Design - randomized prospective parallel

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Edinburg, Texas, United States, 78539
        • J. Michael Adame, DDS, PA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Baseline diagnosis AHI > or = 5 plus ESS . or = 10.

  • PAP Intolerance
  • Partial Response to oral appliance therapy: AHI > 5
  • Age: > 18 Exclusion Criteria: History of daily use of alcohol, narcotics or Central Nervous System (CNS) depressants.
  • Diagnosis of Central Sleep Apnea
  • Pregnancy
  • Edentulous
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Combination Therapy with Preferred Mask
Preferred Mask refers to a type of existing medical mask used for PAP therapy.
Study compares Nuance Pro plus Automatic Positive Airway Pressure (autoPAP) vs TAP PAP plus autoPAP
Other Names:
  • TAP PAP
autoPAP
Experimental: Combination Therapy with Custom Mask
Custom Mask refers to a mask which is supported by an interface which attaches directly to the patient's oral appliance.
autoPAP
TAP PAP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apnea-Hypopnea Index
Time Frame: 2 months
Episodes per hour that the patient experiences apneas and/or hypopneas
2 months
PAP Pressure
Time Frame: 2 months
The pressure required to treat the patient successfully
2 months
Leaks
Time Frame: 2 months
The Liters/Minute of leaking of the PAP machine
2 months
Hours of Use
Time Frame: 2 months
The average hours of use per night of each of the combination therapies
2 months
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Time Frame: 2 months
The ESS is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. The score can range from 0 to 24. The higher the ESS score, the higher that person's average sleep propensity in daily life.
2 months
Functional Outcomes Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ)
Time Frame: 2 months
FOSQ is a disease specific quality of life questionnaire to determine how sleepiness interferes one's quality of life. The total score range from 5 to 20 (10 questions, 1-4 points per each). The lower values represent a worse quality of life.
2 months
Intolerance Questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 months
This questionnaire consists of 4 questions to determine the frequency of 4 typical side-effects from positive airway pressure therapy. The score ranges from 0 to 16 (4 questions, 0-4 points per each). The higher value represent worse side effects.
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 6, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on Nuance Pro

Subscribe