Sociological Determinants of Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in OSA Patients (SOCIO-SAS)

February 2, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Sociological Determinants of Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure In the Management of Sleep Apnea Syndrome - A Transdisciplinary Approach.

Multicentric, prospective, opened study to evaluate the impact of Health Literacy Levels on CPAP withdrawal in Obstructive Sleep Apnea patients within 6 months of inclusion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) is a chronic multi-organ pathology and heterogeneous in its presentation and phenotypes.

To date, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment for OSA. In France, 1.2 million patients are treated with CPAP but 15% of patients refused the device at the time of diagnosis and the rate of non-adherence reach 43% 3 years after CPAP initiation.

Both in terms of sleepiness and cardiovascular symptoms, clinical improvement is correlated with normalization of ventilation and therefore with the use of CPAP throughout the sleep period by the patients. Adherence to CPAP is nowadays achieved by the contribution of tele-observance, which provides prescribers, home health care providers and patients with daily feedback on the effectiveness and compliance of the therapy.

To date, studies targeting the predictive factors of CPAP compliance in OSA patients mainly include clinical data (age, sex, severity of OSAS, symptoms, etc.), or technical factors directly related to CPAP treatment (type of mask, residual apnea hypopnea index (AHI) under treatment, leakage, side effects, etc.).

The social, socioeconomic and psychological approaches are far less studied and frankly underestimated, although they are gradually gaining interest, representing the submerged part of the iceberg. Some studies have shown an association between poor socioeconomic status and poor compliance with CPAP, while others have focused on psychological factors. Finally, in the work of our team, we have recently looked at the impact of the marital on compliance and the perception of the associated benefit. However, each study targets a specific area, without taking into account the clinical and individual determinants. Therefore, there is a lack of knowledge about individual determinants of CPAP adherence.

Health literacy, defined as "the ability to access, understand, evaluate, and communicate information in ways that promote, maintain, and improve one's health in a variety of settings across the lifespan" is a possible important limitation for a patient to understand the need for PAP treatment and was never explored in view to explain CPAP adherence.

This project aims to exploit a unique transdisciplinary approach to characterize refusal, discontinuation, and nonadherence to CPAP in patients with diagnosed OSA newly managed on CPAP.

The main hypothesis of the study is that a patient with an insufficient level of health literacy (LS) (score from 0 to 8 defined from the European Health Literacy Survey questionnaire) has a greater probability of stopping treatment early or of being non-compliant than a patient with better performance in terms of health literacy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • La Tronche, France, 38043
        • Recruiting
        • CHUGA
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • JL PEPIN
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • R TAMISIER
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • M DESTORS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • S BAILLIEUL
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • R CLIN
        • Principal Investigator:
          • S BAILLY
      • Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Obstructive Sleep Apnea patients with cPAP indication

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient newly diagnosed with OSA
  • Patient with indication for CPAP
  • Voluntary patient with informed consent and no objection to participation
  • Patient affiliated with or benefiting from a social security plan

Non-Inclusion Criteria:

  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, person subject to a legal protection measure (patient under guardianship or curators) according to articles L1121-5 to L1121-8
  • Refusal of participation by the patient
  • Patient refusing telemonitoring

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To study the impact of health literacy levels on CPAP discontinuation in newly fitted OSA patients
Time Frame: Between initiation of CPAP (day 7 to 15 after inclusion) to V2 (6 months after inclusion)
Proportion of CPAP treatment discontinuation without switch to mandibular advancement orthosis treatment
Between initiation of CPAP (day 7 to 15 after inclusion) to V2 (6 months after inclusion)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To study the impact of health literacy levels on CPAP refusal after diagnosis.
Time Frame: At V1 (inclusion)
Proportion of CPAP refusals after diagnosis
At V1 (inclusion)
To study the interactions between the different socio-economic factors studied and their influence on adherence to the CPAP treatment
Time Frame: At 6 month
Average CPAP adherence
At 6 month
Define the relationship between various clinical, social, economic, environmental determinants and adherence in addition to health literacy.
Time Frame: At 6 months
Average CPAP adherence
At 6 months
Determine adherence trajectories as a function of health literacy and specifically study the specific determinants of adherence.
Time Frame: Over 6 months
Daily CPAP adherence data obtained by telemonitoring
Over 6 months
To investigate the impact of health literacy levels on adherence status. With adherence status defined here in several ways (≥4h vs <4h; adherence quartiles or adherence clusters).
Time Frame: At 6 month (V2)
Average CPAP adherence
At 6 month (V2)
Identify profiles of patients who refuse CPAP or are non- adherent or who have stopped CPAP according to personal determinants
Time Frame: At 6 months
Adherent, non-adherent, or discontinued status. With adherence status defined here in several ways (≥ 4 hours per night for at least 70% of the nights ; adherence quartiles or adherence clusters).
At 6 months
To decipher the links made by people in treatment discontinuation or qualified as non-observant from the medical point of view, between the different factors of non-observance identified.
Time Frame: within 15 days of refusal of CPAP treatment, or within 15 days of discontinuation of treatment during the 6-month follow-up, or within 15 days of visit 2 for both non-adherent and adherent patients at 6 months.
Criteria identified on the basis of analyses of the corpus carried out from semi-structured interviews concerning knowledge of the pathology, the relationship with the treatment, the relationship with health professionals, and the life trajectory in terms of health care, making it possible to better understand patients' non-adherence.
within 15 days of refusal of CPAP treatment, or within 15 days of discontinuation of treatment during the 6-month follow-up, or within 15 days of visit 2 for both non-adherent and adherent patients at 6 months.
Understand how people explain these situations based on their life contexts, representations of the disease and treatment, particularly their understanding of the issues involved.
Time Frame: Within 15 days of refusal of treatment for patients refusing CPAP, or within 15 days of discontinuation of treatment for patients who stopped treatment during the 6-month follow-up, or within 15 days of visit 2 for non-adherent patients at 6 month
Criteria identified on the basis of analyses of the corpus carried out from semi-structured interviews concerning knowledge of the pathology, the relationship with the treatment, the relationship with health professionals, and the life trajectory in terms of health care, making it possible to better understand patients' non-adherence.
Within 15 days of refusal of treatment for patients refusing CPAP, or within 15 days of discontinuation of treatment for patients who stopped treatment during the 6-month follow-up, or within 15 days of visit 2 for non-adherent patients at 6 month
Analyze people's perceptions of their health information practices, their relationship with the medical profession and the role of those involved in their pathology to understanding CPAP treatment
Time Frame: Within 15 days of refusal of treatment for patients refusing CPAP, or within 15 days of discontinuation of treatment during the 6-month follow-up, or within 15 days of visit 2 for all patients at 6 month
Criteria identified on the basis of analyses of the corpus carried out from semi-structured interviews concerning knowledge of the pathology, the relationship with the treatment, the relationship with health professionals, and the life trajectory in terms of health care, making it possible to better understand patients' non-adherence.
Within 15 days of refusal of treatment for patients refusing CPAP, or within 15 days of discontinuation of treatment during the 6-month follow-up, or within 15 days of visit 2 for all patients at 6 month
Identify the change in adherent patient's relationship to their treatment and the perceived benefits
Time Frame: Within 6 months of the first interview
Criteria identified on the basis of analyses of the corpus carried out from semi-structured interviews concerning knowledge of the pathology, the relationship with the treatment, the relationship with health professionals, and the life trajectory in terms of health care, making it possible to better understand patients' adherence.
Within 6 months of the first interview
Describe the evolution of non-adherent patient's situation, the health and potential compensation strategies or alternatives that they have implemented to limit the impact of their untreated OSAS
Time Frame: Within 6 months of the first interview for non-adherent patients
Criteria identified on the basis of analyses of the corpus carried out from semi-structured interviews concerning knowledge of the pathology, the relationship with the treatment, the relationship with health professionals, and the life trajectory in terms of health care, making it possible to better understand patients' non-adherence.
Within 6 months of the first interview for non-adherent patients

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sébastien Bailly, PharmD, PhD, Sleep and respiratory diseases Lab, CHU Grenoble Alpes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Subscribe