The Effect of a Novel Passive Shoulder Exoskeleton During Industrial Work

The Effect of a Novel Passive Shoulder Exoskeleton on the Human Body During Simulated Industrial Tasks

After designing a first prototype of next generation industrial exoskeleton, the system should be evaluated in laboratory conditions. In order to evaluate the passive shoulder exoskeleton, designed to assist workers, a protocol is developed in which parts of industrial work is simulated. The results of this evaluation will serve as input for the next iterative design process/cycle of the prototype.

In this study 15 subjects will be recruited. During a 3.5h lab visit, each subject will perform three identical experimental trials; one trial without exoskeleton, one trial with a commercially available exoskeleton and one with the newly developed prototype. To avoid sequence bias, the order of the trials will be randomized (counterbalanced). The protocol consists of 6 tasks, always performed in the same sequence; lifting 5 kg 5 times from hip height to overhead height, completing a wiring task overhead (90 sec), 6 minutes walking, 6 min lifting from hip to overhead height (10 kg), 6 min lifting from ground to hip level (10 kg) and drilling for 30 sec with a force of 60N (±20 N). Before each task, 5 min of rest will be provided, and the subject will receive 10 min of rest in between different experimental trials. Electrocardiographic data, chest expansion and skin temperature will be monitored through a belt (Equivital, AD Instruments). An ergospirometric device (K5, Cosmed) will be used to gather gas exchange data, and (non-invasive) EMG electrodes will be applied to collect muscle activity data during the trials (Cometa). IMUs will be applied to the subjects' extremities to analyse the movement pattern (Technaid). Furthermore, questionnaires will be filled out to assess the subjective experience (Rating of Perceived Exertion, Sustained Usability Scale, Local Discomfort Scale).

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: Exoskeleton Device
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Industrial passive shoulder exoskeleton

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 21
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Belgium
  • Brussel, Belgium, 1050
    • Lichamelijk Opvoeding en Kinesitherapie

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• healthy individuals (based on ParQ questionnaire)

Exclusion Criteria:

• work related disorders
• shoulder injuries in the past
• back injuries in the past

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: No exoskeleton; The experimental protocol will be performed without exoskeleton.	Device: Industrial passive shoulder exoskeleton; Both exoskeleton types are passive shoulder exoskeletons. The goal is to compare the human response to the simulated industrial tasks between the different exoskeleton conditions.
Experimental: Prototype exoskeleon; The experimental trial will be performed with the prototype exoskeleton	Device: Industrial passive shoulder exoskeleton; Both exoskeleton types are passive shoulder exoskeletons. The goal is to compare the human response to the simulated industrial tasks between the different exoskeleton conditions.
Experimental: Skel-Ex; The experimental protocol will be performed with the commercially available Skel-Ex 360 (Skel-Ex, Rotterdam, The Netherlands)	Device: Industrial passive shoulder exoskeleton; Both exoskeleton types are passive shoulder exoskeletons. The goal is to compare the human response to the simulated industrial tasks between the different exoskeleton conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Surface electromyography	Cometa (mini wave) sensors with Ambu (BlueSensor) electrodes will be used to collect electromyographic data conform the SENIAM guidelines. The muscles that will be monitored are: erector spinae, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, trapezius (all three parts), deltoideus (all three parts), pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, brachioradialis, biceps brachii, triceps brachii on both the left and the right side of the body. The locations of the sensors will be prepared by shaving, abrasion with sandpaper and cleaning with alcohol. To allow relative expression of muscle activities, maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) of each muscle that is being monitored will be collected. The average of the maximal activity out of the best two out of three contractions will serve as the MVIC value. The outcomes will be the activities of the muscles (as a percentage of the MVIC) monitored during the tests.	Electromyographic data will be collected continuously during all simulated industrial tasks. This will take 3 hours in total.
Heart rate	An Equivital belt will be worn by all subject. heart rate can be computed from the ECG signal	Heart rate will be monitored continuously during all tasks. This will take 3 hours in total
Metabolic cost	A Cosmed K5 device will be used to measure oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide exhaust during every task lasting longer than three minutes. The outcome measures are the metabolic cost during walking, overhead lifting and lower lifting. The metabolic cost will be computed with the measured oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide exhaust.	Metabolic cost will be monitored continuously during all tasks. This will take 3 hours in total
session Rating of Perceived exertion	This questionnaire scores the perceived exertion during a task. Scores can range from 6 to 20, with 6 being not exhausted at all and 20 being extremely exhausted. The scale is only one question, so no sub-scales are available	the sRPE will be asked at the end of the task. The entire protocol will last for approximately 3 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Heart rate variability	The distance between R peaks in the electrocardiogram	Will be computed for every task. The recording will be continuous throughout the whole protocol, lasting for approximately 3 hours.

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Vrije Universiteit Brussel
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Romain Meeusen, Prof. dr., VUB

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 30, 2019
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): January 31, 2022
• Study Completion (Anticipated): September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 19, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 25, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): September 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 20, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 19, 2021
• Last Verified: April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Human-centered robotics; Prototype evaluation; Industry
• Other Study ID Numbers: EXOTEST2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: The data can not be made public as this is part of a larger project

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No