Study to Evaluate the Impact of Using Wearable Devices in Addition to Standard Clinical Practice on Parkinson´s Subject Symptoms Management

February 16, 2019 updated by: UCB Biopharma S.P.R.L.

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Two-Arm Study to Evaluate the Impact of Using Wearable Devices in Addition to Standard Clinical Practice on Parkinson´s Subject Symptoms Management

Evaluate the benefits of Kinesia-360™ wearable technology in addition to standard clinical practice on improving Parkinson´s disease motor symptoms, Neupro dosing regimen and adherence to Neupro compared with only standard clinical practice.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Fountain Valley, California, United States, 92708
        • Pd0049 105
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33486
        • Pd0049 102
    • Illinois
      • Winfield, Illinois, United States, 60190
        • Pd0049 108
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • Pd0049 103
    • New York
      • Commack, New York, United States, 11725
        • Pd0049 106
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74136
        • Pd0049 104
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615
        • Pd0049 107
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Pd0049 109

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is newly prescribed Neupro and is expected to commence Neupro treatment. Historical Neupro treatment is permitted
  • Informed Consent form (ICF) is signed and dated by the subject, before any study-related procedures
  • Subject is considered reliable and capable of adhering to the protocol, visit schedule, completion of the diary, and using Kinesia devices according to the judgment of the Investigator
  • Male or female subject, >=18 years of age at the time of the Screening Visit
  • Subject has Parkinson's disease, defined by the cardinal sign, bradykinesia, plus the presence of at least 1 of the following: tremor at rest, rigidity or impairment of postural reflexes, and without any other known or suspected cause of Secondary Parkinsonism
  • Subject experiences motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease that are not sufficiently controlled by current therapy. The average of the triplicate resting tremor scores and triplicate finger tapping scores from Kinesia-ONE™ (6 scores in total) must be >1.0

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is currently participating in any study with an investigational medicinal product or investigational device
  • Subject has any medical, neurological or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the subject's ability to participate in this study
  • Subject with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) device implant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Rotigotine + Standard Care
Subjects will use the Kinesia-ONE™ wearable device in-clinic at Visit 1 and Visit 2 for recording of specific motor symptoms. The optimal dose of Neupro for any given subject will be determined by standard clinical practice.
Kinesia-ONE™ wearable sensor uses a subject-worn finger sensor and iPad mini application (APP) to objectively measure specific motor tasks related to Parkinson's disease symptoms such as tremor, bradykinesia (slowed movements), and dyskinesia (involuntary movements) in the Investigator's office. Subjects should wear the Kinesia-ONE™ device on the most affected side.
All subjects will start Neupro treatment at a dose of either rotigotine 2 mg/24 h or 4 mg/24 h (according to the disease stage of the subject) which will then be adjusted based on symptom assessment either via standard care alone or via a combination of standard care and evaluation of the recordings made available by the Kinesia wearable technologies.
Other Names:
  • Neupro
Experimental: Rotigotine + Standard Care + Kinesia-360™ wearable device
Subjects will use the Kinesia-ONE™ wearable device in-clinic at Visit 1 and Visit 2 for recording of specific motor symptoms, and additionally subjects will use the Kinesia-360™ wearable device at home while awake for continuous measurement of motor symptoms. The Investigator will use these symptom data to provide feedback to subjects on their motor symptoms and to supplement standard of care to titrate the optimal dose of Neupro for any given subject.
Kinesia-ONE™ wearable sensor uses a subject-worn finger sensor and iPad mini application (APP) to objectively measure specific motor tasks related to Parkinson's disease symptoms such as tremor, bradykinesia (slowed movements), and dyskinesia (involuntary movements) in the Investigator's office. Subjects should wear the Kinesia-ONE™ device on the most affected side.
All subjects will start Neupro treatment at a dose of either rotigotine 2 mg/24 h or 4 mg/24 h (according to the disease stage of the subject) which will then be adjusted based on symptom assessment either via standard care alone or via a combination of standard care and evaluation of the recordings made available by the Kinesia wearable technologies.
Other Names:
  • Neupro
Kinesia-360™ wearable sensor includes a wrist and ankle device, along with a cell phone, which is also APP-based, and is designed for continuous day time monitoring of Parkinson's disease symptoms. Subjects will wear Kinesia-360™ while they go about their daily lives, and symptom severity is continually captured to enable objective assessment of Parkinson's disease symptoms. Subjects should wear the Kinesia-360™ device bands on the most affected side.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12/ 3 months after start of treatment with Neupro)
UPDRS Part III has 27 items assessing motor skills including facial expression and speech, tremors, rigidity, posture, gait, and bradykinesia. Each of the 27 items in the UPDRS part III is measured on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities. The motor score ranges from 0 to 108, where the maximum score indicates the worse condition. A negative value in change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale indicates improvement, whereas a positive value indicates worsening of disease.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12/ 3 months after start of treatment with Neupro)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Finger Tapping Speed Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rest Tremor Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Averaged Finger Tapping Speed and Resting Tremor Scores
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. The finger tapping speed scores and resting tremor scores were averaged and provided as one score ranging from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Postural Tremor Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Finger Tapping Amplitude Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Hand Grasp Speed Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Hand Grasp Amplitude Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rapid Alternating Movement Speed Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Rapid Alternating Amplitude Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Visit 2 in Kinesia-ONE™ Variable: Dyskinesia Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Kinesia-ONE™ measures were averaged from triplicate repeated assessments at a measurement point. Kinesia-ONE scores ranged from 0 to 4 (where 0 is normal and 4 represents severe abnormalities), with negative change from Baseline scores indicating improvement in disease symptoms.
Baseline (Visit 1/Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Neupro Dose Per 24h at Visit 2 (Week 12)
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Week 12)
Daily dose of study medication taken at respective visit.
Visit 2 (Week 12)
Number of Neupro Dose Changes During the Study
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Dose adjustments during study are performed per standard of care.
Visit 1 (Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Number of Subjects Who Discontinued the Treatment With Neupro During the Course of the Study
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
Number of subjects who discontinued Neupro Treatment were recorded.
Visit 1 (Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With Any Adverse Events During the Course of the Study
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Visit 1 (Week 1) to Visit 2 (Week 12)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson´s Disease

Clinical Trials on Kinesia-ONE™

3
Subscribe