Autonomic Activity During Nap Under Hypoxia (NAPOXIA)

July 7, 2022 updated by: Anja Maehler, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Effects of Normobaric Hypoxia on Autonomic Activity During a Nap in Healthy Adults (NAPOXIA)

Sleeping under hypoxic conditions can impair cognition and autonomic nervous activity. A short daytime nap can modify these changes. Here we propose a randomized, cross-over study to evaluate the heart rate variability during a 90 min nap in a normobaric hypoxic chamber. In addition, we will investigate sleep architecture, vigilance, attention and memory.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 13125
        • Experimental & Clinical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women
  • Age 25-45 years
  • BMI 20 - 28 kg/m^2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe, manifest illnesses in need of treatment
  • Postoperative phases
  • Acute and chronic infections
  • Sleep disorders such as sleep apnea, insomnia or somnolence
  • Altitude exposure (> 2500 m asl) within 6 months before enrollment
  • Regular migraines
  • Smoking
  • Athletes
  • Significant weight change within 1 month before enrollment
  • Inability to understand significance and scope of the study
  • Drug or alcohol abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Normoxia
20.9% oxygen
Nap in hypoxia chamber at 20.9% oxygen (36 m asl)
Active Comparator: Hypoxia 1
15.0% oxygen
Nap in hypoxia chamber at 15.0% oxygen (simulates 2660 m asl)
Active Comparator: Hypoxia 2
12.8% oxygen
Nap in hypoxia chamber at 12.8% oxygen (simulates 4000 m asl)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. 12.8% hypoxic condition
Mean RR interval measured by polysomnography (ms)
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. 12.8% hypoxic condition

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. 15.0% hypoxic condition
Mean RR interval measured by polysomnography (ms)
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. 15.0% hypoxic condition
Sleep Efficiency (SE)
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Measured by continuous polysomnography (min)
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Measured by continuous polysomnography (min)
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Sleep Onset Latency (SOL)
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Measured by continuous polysomnography (min)
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Low Frequency / High Frequency Band
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Mean LF/HF ratio measured by continuous ECG
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Standard Deviation 1 / Standard Deviation 2
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Mean SD1/SD2 ratio measured by continuous ECG
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
RR intervals longer than 50 ms
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Percentage pNN50 measured by continuous ECG (%)
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Core Body Temperature
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Mean temperature measured by continuous double sensor monitoring (°C)
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Skin Temperature
Time Frame: During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Mean temperature measured by continuous double sensor monitoring (°C)
During 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Digit Span Task
Time Frame: After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Longest memorized digit series (n, normal range 5-9, higher is better)
After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Psychomotor Vigilance Task Subscale 1
Time Frame: After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Number of lapses (normal range 0-6, higher is worse)
After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Psychomotor Vigilance Task Subscale 2
Time Frame: After 90 min nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Mean reaction time (normal range 100-500 ms, higher is worse)
After 90 min nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Color Stroope Task Subscale 1
Time Frame: After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Number of incongruency errors (normal range 0-5, higher is worse)
After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Color Stroope Task Subscale 2
Time Frame: After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Congruent response time (normal range 400-500 ms, higher is worse)
After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Color Stroope Task Subscale 3
Time Frame: After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Incongruent response time (normal range 600-800 ms, higher is worse)
After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Color Stroope Task Subscale 4
Time Frame: After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Congruent accuracy (above 95% is normal, higher is better)
After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Color Stroope Task Subscale 5
Time Frame: After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)
Incongruent accuracy (above 85% is normal, higher is better)
After 90 minutes nap under normoxic (20.9%) vs. two hypoxic conditions (12.8 and 15%)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alain Riveros, MD, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NAPOXIA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results of reported articles (text, tables, figures, supplemental data) will be shared after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Normoxia

Subscribe