An Augmented Reality Based System for Neglect Detection, Assessment, and Rehabilitation

July 5, 2023 updated by: Murat Akcakaya, University of Pittsburgh
The aim of this phase is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the Augmented Reality (AR)-based and electroencephalography (EEG)-based neglect detection and rehabilitation tool.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Northeastern University
        • Contact:
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15260
        • Recruiting
        • University of Pittsburgh
        • Contact:
          • Murat Akcakaya, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ages18 and older
  • acute stroke
  • admitted to inpatient rehabilitation
  • presence of neglect (Behavioral Inattention Test total score <129, or scoring below pre-defined cutoff score in at least one of the six subtests)
  • more than 10/% missed targets on the Augmented Reality Screening Test
  • intact vibration (positive test on Vibration Sensation Test)
  • intact auditory function (positive test on Auditory Sensation Test)
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to follow one-step directions at least 80% of the time
  • current diagnosis of dementia, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, or space-occupying tumor
  • metal in the head that causes interference with the EEG system
  • self-report of previous positive photic stimulation test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: augmented reality
The participants will be wearing an EEG cap and Augmented Reality headset (AR-based EEG-guided system) for 10 sessions with a licensed occupational therapist, provided in addition to usual rehabilitation care (either in inpatient rehabilitation or at home). These sessions will focus on activities of daily living that the participants want to practice. All sessions will last approximately 1 hour. These sessions will be scheduled around the existing therapy schedule to cause the least amount of interference with planned clinical activities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy; indicated by percent agreement between participant report and EEG-based assessment of neglect
Time Frame: week 4
number of sessions attaining greater than 70 percentage agreement between targets identified by the participant and targets identified by EEG; participants view an augmented reality screen with randomly appearing targets in the field of view; when a target is viewed, the participant presses a keyboard key; immediately after, targets randomly appear on the augmented reality screen while the participant's brain activity is recorded by EEG; EEG detects viewed and neglected targets based on brain signals;
week 4
Reliability; indicated by correlation coefficient between two consecutive sessions of EEG recording
Time Frame: week 4
number of consecutive sessions attaining Pearson correlation coefficient r greater than.10
week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technology Satisfaction; indicated by a mean score of 3 or higher on the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology
Time Frame: week 4
number of participants attaining greater than or equal to 90 percentage satisfaction; satisfaction is rated on 12 items with a 5-point likert scale, 5 indicating very high satisfaction; items are summed with total a total score of 60 indicating very high satisfaction;
week 4
Program Satisfaction; indicated by mean score of 3 or greater on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: week 4
number of participants attaining greater than or equal to 90 percentage satisfaction; satisfaction is rated on 8 items with a 4-point likert scale, 4 indicating very high satisfaction; items are summed with total a total score of 32 indicating very high satisfaction;
week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Murat Akcakaya, PhD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY19060390
  • 1915083 (Other Grant/Funding Number: NSF)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Recorded EEG data may be disseminated to collaborators, other researchers, or the general public, for instance via DScholarship@Pitt: University of Pittsburgh Institutional Repository or through Pitt Box. At this time, there are no specific external parties. If in the future, access to data is requested, any identifying data to will be removed from the EEG data to protect participants' privacy.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on augmented reality

3
Subscribe