Safety and Efficacy of ARNI After LVAD ImplanT (SEAL-IT) Study (SEAL-IT)

June 4, 2021 updated by: Jerry Estep MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Safety and Efficacy of Angiotensin Receptor-neprilysin Inhibitor After Left Ventricular Assist Device ImplanT (SEAL-IT) Study

The purpose of the study is to evaluate how well tolerated and effective an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril-valsartan) is in patients with contemporary durable continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation compared to usual care oral vasodilator therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this pilot study is to prospectively determine the short-term (at 3 months) and long-term (at 6 and 12 months) safety and efficacy of an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril-valsartan) in patients with contemporary durable continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation compared to standard-of-care (usual care) oral vasodilator therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jerry D Estep, MD
  • Phone Number: 216-444-7646
  • Email: estepj@ccf.org

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults (age ≥ 18 years)
  2. Durable CF-LVAD for any indication
  3. NYHA II to IV classification
  4. LVEF < 40%
  5. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to comply with the conditions of the protocol
  2. Any patient with durable CF-LVAD who has any one of the following:

    i. symptomatic hypotension or MAP < 60 mm Hg at randomization,

    ii. eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at randomization,

    iii. potassium > 5.4 mM at randomization,

    iv. history of angioedema at randomization,

    v. history of unacceptable side effects with ACE inhibitor, ARB, or sacubitril-valsartan therapy at randomization,

    vi. use of vasoactive agents (e.g., dobutamine, dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, phenylephrine, vasopressin, nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, epoprostenol) or parenteral diuretics in 24 hours preceding randomization.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sacubitril-valsartan study arm
  1. Start medication-naïve patients on low-dose sacubitril-valsartan (24/26 mg PO BID) without a washout period per guideline and label recommendations.
  2. Switch patients to equivalent dose sacubitril-valsartan if on prior ACE inhibitor (after a 36 hour washout period) or ARB therapy (after discontinuing one day prior).
  3. If therapeutic range MAP (65 to 85 mm Hg), discontinue other oral vasodilator (e.g., hydralazine, isordil) or non-rate limiting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (non-DHP CCB, e.g., amlodipine) therapy on the day prior to sacubitril-valsartan initiation. If MAP > 85 mm Hg, low-dose sacubitril-valsartan will be added with or without discontinuation of other oral vasodilator or non-DHP CCB per physician's discretion based on drug tolerability and maintenance of therapeutic range MAP.
  4. Sacubitril-valsartan can be up-titrated every 2-4 weeks per standard practice guidelines per physician's discretion as above.
Sacubitril-valsartan at low or equivalent dose to be initiated or added to patients randomized to this arm, and titrated up every 2-4 weeks, per standard practice guidelines and label recommendations per physician's discretion.
Other Names:
  • Entresto
Active Comparator: Usual care (standard-of-care) arm

1. Continue current regimen of patients on oral vasodilator therapy (e.g., ACE inhibitor, ARB, hydralazine, isordil), allowing for up-titration of the drug every 2-4 weeks per standard practice guidelines in keeping with physician's discretion as above.

2. Start medication-naïve patients de novo on one of the oral vasodilators as below per guideline and label recommendations, allowing for up-titration of the drug every 2-4 weeks per standard practice guidelines in keeping with physician's discretion as above: i. ACE inhibitor: Enalapril 2.5 mg PO BID or Lisinopril 5 mg PO daily; ii. ARB: Valsartan 20 mg PO BID or Losartan 25 mg PO daily; iii. Other: Hydralazine 10 mg PO TID or Isordil 5 mg PO TID.

Other oral vasodilator therapy to be continued or initiated to patients randomized to this arm, and titrated up every 2-4 weeks, per standard practice guidelines and label recommendations per physician's discretion.
Other Names:
  • Oral Vasodilator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of drug discontinuation from drug-related adverse events due to sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
Incidence of drug discontinuation from drug-related adverse events due to sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 3 months. Incidence of drug discontinuation is defined as the number of patients exposed to the drug with an adverse event over the total number of patients exposed to the drug. An adverse event is defined as any one of the following: acute kidney injury with eGFR decline > 25% from baseline, hyperkalemia with potassium > 5.5 mM, hypotension with mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mm Hg, angioedema, dizziness, and/or cough.
3 months
Time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP concentration (pg/mL) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 3 months
Time Frame: 3 months
Time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP concentration (pg/mL) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 3 months.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP concentration (pg/mL) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP concentration (pg/mL) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 and 12 months.
6 and 12 months
Proportion of patients (%) with effective MAP control (65 to 85 mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 3, 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Proportion of patients (%) with effective MAP control (65 to 85 mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months.
3, 6 and 12 months
Proportion of patients (%) on other cardiac medications with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 3, 6 and 12 months relative to baseline
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Proportion of patients (%) on other cardiac medications (e.g., diuretics, aldosterone antagonists, beta-blockers, oral vasodilators, and anti-hypertensives) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months relative to baseline.
3, 6 and 12 months
Proportion of patients (%) in each New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 3, 6 and 12 months relative to baseline
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Proportion of patients (%) in each New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (e.g., functional class I-IV) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months relative to baseline.
3, 6 and 12 months
Proportion of patients (%) with heart failure readmissions with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Proportion of patients (%) with heart failure readmissions with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy determined at 6 and 12 months.
6 and 12 months
Absolute change in mean left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (mm) on echocardiogram with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mean left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (mm) on echocardiogram with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mitral E/A ratio on echocardiogram with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mitral E/A ratio on echocardiogram with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in indexed left atrial volume (mL/m2) on echocardiogram with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in indexed left atrial volume (mL/m2) on echocardiogram with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in indexed right atrial volume (mL/m2) on echocardiogram with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in indexed right atrial volume (mL/m2) on echocardiogram with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mean right atrial pressure (mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mean right atrial pressure (mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mean pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mean pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (mm Hg) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in pulmonary artery pulsatility index with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in pulmonary artery pulsatility index with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in pulmonary vascular resistance (Woods Unit) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in pulmonary vascular resistance (Woods Unit) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in systemic vascular resistance (dynes-sec/cm5) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in systemic vascular resistance (dynes-sec/cm5) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in cardiac index (L/min/m2) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Time Frame: 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months
Absolute change in cardiac index (L/min/m2) with sacubitril-valsartan versus standard-of-care oral vasodilator therapy evaluated at 6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months.
6 weeks and/or 3, 6 and/or 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jerry D Estep, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage D Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Sacubitril-Valsartan

3
Subscribe