Functionally-tailored Oral Care Intervention for Community-dwelling Older Adults With Dementia and Their Caregivers

April 8, 2025 updated by: Xi Chen

The specific aims of this study are:

Aim 1. Develop a staged and modifiable dyadic oral care intervention to provide functionally-tailored oral care rehabilitation for community-dwelling persons with dementia (PWD) and need-based skills training their family caregivers (CGs). Based on the literature review and MCWB, a 4-week intervention with 8 modules, including universal modules (e.g., environmental changes), CG modules (e.g., cuing strategies) and modules for both PWD and CGs (e.g., oral care techniques), will be developed addressing the relevant SCT constructs (e.g., functional deficits of PWD and caregiving needs of CGs). Guided by a validated, widely-used theory of rehabilitation medicine, modules will be used alone or in combination to provide personalized, hand-on, functionally-tailored oral care rehabilitation for PWD along with skills training for CGs to match their caregiving needs. The training focus shifts from the PWD to the CG, as the independence of the PWD decreases. Semi-structured interviews with family CGs will then be conducted (until data saturation is reached) to understand their oral care needs, desired intervention approaches, and the perceived feasibility and utility of the intervention. The intervention will be revised and then pilot tested with 4 dyads, one per each of the four functional levels of the DAT.

Aim 2. Evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the intervention in home settings through a randomized, controlled trial with 40 pairs of PWD and their primary CGs, including immediate post-intervention and 3-month follow-up. Dyads will be stratified into 4 functional levels based on the PWD's DAT score and then randomly assigned to the intervention or control (non-tailored usual care) group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to develop and evaluate a functionally-tailored oral hygiene intervention to improve oral health for community-dwelling persons with dementia, while also reducing caregiver burden and improving the care partner relationship. The study consists of two phases. First, we will develop a modularized, functionally-tailorable oral care intervention based on caregiver qualitative interviews and existing literature. The second phase will then examine the efficacy and feasibility of the intervention through a randomized controlled trial (3 intervention: 1control ratio)with 40 Persons with Dementia/caregiver dyads. Control participants will receive the standard oral hygiene education currently provided to persons with Dementia during dental care. The Intervention group will receive 4-week, dyadic, hands-on, functionally-tailored oral care intervention. We will collect data at baseline, 4-weeks, and 3 months post intervention. After data collection, the differences in the control and intervention groups in regard to their oral hygiene, behavioral symptoms during oral care, caregiver outcomes (burden, self-efficacy) and care partner relationship will be explored.

The specific aims of this study are:

Aim 1. Develop a staged and modifiable dyadic oral care intervention to provide functionally-tailored oral care rehabilitation for community-dwelling persons with dementia (PWD) and need-based skills training their family caregivers (CGs). Based on the literature review and MCWB, a 4-week intervention with 8 modules, including universal modules (e.g., environmental changes), CG modules (e.g., cuing strategies) and modules for both PWD and CGs (e.g., oral care techniques), will be developed addressing the relevant SCT constructs (e.g., functional deficits of PWD and caregiving needs of CGs). Guided by a validated, widely-used theory of rehabilitation medicine, modules will be used alone or in combination to provide personalized, hand-on, functionally-tailored oral care rehabilitation for PWD along with skills training for CGs to match their caregiving needs. The training focus shifts from the PWD to the CG, as the independence of the PWD decreases. Semi-structured interviews with family CGs will then be conducted (until data saturation is reached) to understand their oral care needs, desired intervention approaches, and the perceived feasibility and utility of the intervention. The intervention will be revised and then pilot tested with 4 dyads, one per each of the four functional levels of the DAT.

Aim 2. Evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the intervention in home settings through a randomized, controlled trial with 40 pairs of PWD and their primary CGs, including immediate post-intervention and 3-month follow-up. Dyads will be stratified into 4 functional levels based on the PWD's DAT score and then randomly assigned to the intervention or control (non-tailored usual care) group.

Sub-Aim 2.1 Evaluate the feasibility of the intervention across four domains: acceptability, demand, implementation, and practicality. We will interview the dyads and review their daily oral care logs at both post-intervention and 3-month follow-up, assessing satisfaction with, acceptability of, and actual use of the intervention. Oral care trainers will complete intervention logs following each training session to document the extent of content delivery, diversion from the protocol, resources used, and perceptions about intervention success. Exit interviews with PWD (when possible), CGs, and trainers will be conducted to identify potential barriers, facilitators, and needed changes.

Sub-Aim 2.2 Examine the efficacy of the intervention. We hypothesize that both PWD oral hygiene and CG self-efficacy in providing oral care will show clinically significant improvements for the intervention group compared to the control group. Secondary outcomes for PWD (e.g., behavior symptoms during oral care), CGs (e.g., oral care related burden) and the dyadic relationship (e.g., the Dyadic Relationship Scale) will also be explored.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers:

  • 18 years or older
  • English-speaking
  • Willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria for Caregivers:

  • Cognitively impaired
  • Blind, deaf, or severely disabled

Inclusion Criteria for Persons with Dementia

  • Diagnosis of Dementia
  • Age 50 years or older or 18 years or older with Huntington's Disease
  • Community-dwelling
  • English speaking
  • Have natural teeth
  • Not blind, deaf, or severely disabled
  • Have a caregiver that is age equal or 18+ years old, English speaking, cognitively intact, and willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria for Persons with Dementia:

  • Joint replacement with a history of prosthetic joint infection
  • Requires immediate dental referrals
  • Have oral cancer or active oral infection or 3) is actively dying.
  • Actively dying

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control
PWD/CG dyads
Participants will receive a home-based, un-tailored oral care training. The training includes a tooth brushing and dental care demonstration, and information about oral diseases and dry mouth. This training will be 15 minutes in duration. Participants will have the opportunity to participate in the functionally tailored intervention following the end of this study.
Experimental: Interventional
PWD/CG dyads
Participants receive a 4-week, hands-on, functionally-tailored intervention. The intervention will address topics including tooth brushing, denture care, inter-dental care, tongue care, and dry mouth care. There will be four sessions in total, with each intervention session lasting approximately 45 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Person With Dementia: Oral Hygiene
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 Months
We used the Debris Index (DI) of the Oral Hygiene Index (a scale of 0 to 3, with lower values indicating no debris present and higher values indicating more soft debris on the tooth. Also called plaque score) to assess PWD's oral hygiene status. We used the percentage change in plaque scores between baseline and 3 months to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed intervention on improving PWD's oral hygiene.
Baseline and 3 Months
Self-perceived Oral Care-giving Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 Months
Self-perceived Oral Care-giving Efficacy scale included 19 items to assess self-perceived efficacy in providing oral care to care recipients. We assessed CG's self-perceived oral care-giving efficacy at the baseline and 3-month follow-up visit. We used the percentage change in Self-perceived Oral Care-giving Efficacy scores between the baseline and 3-month follow-up to examine the effectiveness of the proposed intervention on improving CG's oral care-giving skills. Higher scores indicate a better improvement in self-perceived efficacy.
Baseline and 3 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyadic Relationship
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 Months
Dyadic Relationship Scale (DRS) to measure strain between the caregiver and recipient within the past month on a scale of 1 to 4. The original DRS 11 items will be used for caregivers and 10 items will be used for care recipients. High scores indicate high levels of strain and positive interaction. We used the percentage change in dyadic relationship scores between the baseline and 3 months to examine how this intervention affected PWD/CG relationships.
Baseline and 3 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xi Chen, DDS, PhD, Associate professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 22, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Control Intervention

Subscribe