Development of a Diagnostic Prediction Score for Tuberculosis in Hospitalized Children With Severe Acute Malnutrition (TB-Speed SAM)

TB-Speed SAM is a multicentric, prospective diagnostic cohort study conducted in three countries with high and very high TB incidence (Sierra Leone, Uganda, and Zambia). It aims at assessing several diagnostic tests that could result in the development of a score and algorithm for TB treatment decision in hospitalised children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is now strong evidence that undiagnosed and untreated TB increases the risk of death in children, especially those severely malnourished who are highly vulnerable. Specific decision-making tools are therefore urgently needed to guide clinicians from high TB burden and low-income countries to initiate treatment quickly in children with SAM with suspected TB.

A diagnostic prediction score and algorithm was recently proposed by the investigators for TB treatment decision in HIV-infected children with presumptive TB (developed in the ANRS 12229 PAANTHER 01 study). Based on easily collected clinical features, chest X-Ray (CXR), Xpert MTB/RIF, and abdominal ultrasonography, the score aims to help clinicians make a same-day treatment decision. Such a prediction score improving TB diagnosis and shortening time to treatment initiation would be a key benefit in children with SAM.

Based on this experience, the investigators are proposing a diagnostic cohort study enrolling hospitalized severely malnourished children. The study will include the evaluation of several diagnostic tests that could be integrated in the development of a prediction model and subsequent score for the diagnosis of TB in hospitalized children with SAM. This will include Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra performed on one nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) and one stool sample, CXR, Quantiferon (QFT) Interferon-Gamma Release Assay (IGRA), Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and ultrasonography, which has shown its interest for the diagnosis of TB in both HIV-infected adults and children. In the PAANTHER study, it detected abdominal lymphadenopathy in 50% of culture confirmed TB cases and 35% of all confirmed and unconfirmed cases, with a specificity of 85%.

Using logistic regression, a score will be developed for TB diagnosis, considering confirmed and unconfirmed TB as reference diagnosis, in hospitalized children with SAM. As a secondary objective, and in order to reduce costs, sample collection, and complexity of the diagnostic process, a first-step screening score (excluding Ultra, abdominal ultrasound, and CXR if possible) will be developed to identify children with presumptive TB who would benefit from further diagnostic testing.

Both scores will be internally validated using resampling and will be incorporated in a stepwise algorithm to guide practical implementation of the screening and diagnosis process. The stepwise algorithm will be discussed with local clinicians involved in the study to better adapt it for future use in their routine practice.

The study will be implemented at inpatient nutrition centres from three selected tertiary hospitals in Uganda, and Zambia. A total of 720 children <5 years old with WHO-defined severe acute malnutrition will be enrolled with an equal distribution between sites, that is 240 participants per hospital.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

720

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lusaka, Zambia
        • Recruiting
        • Lusaka University Teaching Hospital
      • Ndola, Zambia
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Arthur Davidson Children Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 4 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged < 5 years
  • Severe acute malnutrition defined as weight-for-height Z score (WHZ) < -3 standard deviation (SD) or mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 115 mm or clinical signs of bilateral pitting oedema in children aged <5 years [2]
  • Hospitalized per hospital clinician's decision
  • Parent/guardian informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Ongoing TB treatment or history of intake of anti-TB drugs in the last 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Prospective cohort
Children included in the cohort will all be in the same arm. The patients will benefit from standard-of-care TB diagnosis with additional diagnostic methods.

The diagnostic strategy will include an initial clinical, radiographic and bacteriological evaluation of all enrolled children:

  • TB contact history
  • Suggestive TB symptoms in the previous 4 weeks
  • Physical examination
  • Clinical, anthropometric and biochemical assessment of malnutrition
  • Clinical assessment for other non-dietary causes of malnutrition
  • Digitalized CXR
  • Ultra performed on NPA and stool samples, and one gastric aspirate (GA)
  • Mycobacterial culture performed on two GAs
  • Abdominal ultrasonography
  • QuantiFERON®-TB Gold IGRA
  • Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR)
  • C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

TB diagnosis will be made according to national TB guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the score obtained
Time Frame: 6 months
Sensitivity of the score obtained using predicted probability cut-off with the prediction model for the diagnosis of TB, defined as either confirmed or unconfirmed using the updated Clinical Case Definition for Classification of Intrathoracic Tuberculosis
6 months
Specificity of the score obtained
Time Frame: 6 months
Specificity of the score obtained using predicted probability cut-off with the prediction model for the diagnosis of TB
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of children with NPA and stool samples collected as per study protocol
Time Frame: 6 months
Feasibility of NPA and stool samples collection in HIV-infected children defined as the proportion of children with NPA and stool samples collected as per study protocol
6 months
Proportion of NPA-related adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: 6 months
Safety of NPA collection defined as proportion of AEs (vomiting, nose bleeding, low oxygen saturation, respiratory distress) occurring during NPA
6 months
Prevalence of TB among hospitalized children with SAM
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of confirmed and unconfirmed TB in the study population
6 months
Clinical characteristics of TB disease in hospitalized children with SAM
Time Frame: 6 months
Signs and symptoms of children with tuberculosis (confirmed and unconfirmed)
6 months
Bacteriological characteristics of TB disease in hospitalized children with SAM
Time Frame: 6 months
Bacteriological characteristics (mycobacterial culture and drug susceptibility testing) of children with tuberculosis (confirmed and unconfirmed)
6 months
Biological characteristics of TB disease in hospitalized children with SAM
Time Frame: 6 months
Haematological and immunological characteristics (full blood count, transaminases, CRP, IFN gamma) of children with tuberculosis (confirmed and unconfirmed)
6 months
Radiological characteristics of TB disease in hospitalized children with SAM
Time Frame: 6 months
Radiological features (chest X-ray and abdominal US) of children with tuberculosis (confirmed and unconfirmed)
6 months
Estimated time to TB treatment decision in hospitalized children with SAM
Time Frame: 6 months
Estimated time to TB treatment decision in hospitalized children with SAM, with and without presumptive TB based on the first-step screening prediction score
6 months
Diagnostic accuracy measures: 1/ Sensitivity of the different tests evaluated for the diagnosis of TB
Time Frame: 6 months
Sensitivity of the different tests evaluated for the diagnosis of TB (Ultra performed on NPA and stools, CXR, abdominal ultrasound, QFT, MLR, CRP
6 months
Diagnostic accuracy measures: 2/ Specificity of the different tests evaluated for the diagnosis of TB
Time Frame: 6 months
Specificity of the different tests evaluated for the diagnosis of TB (Ultra performed on NPA and stools, CXR, abdominal ultrasound, QFT, MLR, CRP
6 months
Diagnostic accuracy measures: 3/ Negative predictive value of the different tests evaluated for the diagnosis of TB
Time Frame: 6 months
Negative predictive value of the different tests evaluated for the diagnosis of TB (Ultra performed on NPA and stools, CXR, abdominal ultrasound, QFT, MLR, CRP
6 months
Diagnostic accuracy measures: 4/ Positive predictive value of the different tests evaluated for the diagnosis of TB
Time Frame: 6 months
Positive predictive value of the different tests evaluated for the diagnosis of TB (Ultra performed on NPA and stools, CXR, abdominal ultrasound, QFT, MLR, CRP)
6 months
Diagnostic accuracy measures: 5/ AUROC of diagnostic prediction models with and without the different tests results
Time Frame: 6 months
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve
6 months
Diagnostic accuracy of Ultra performed on one NPA and one stool sample against mycobacterial culture performed on gastric aspirates
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of NPAs and stool samples with mycobacterium tuberculosis detected using Ultra
6 months
Tolerability of NPA collection: 1/ Discomfort/pain/distress experienced by the child as assessed by the child
Time Frame: Within 3 days of inclusion

Discomfort/pain/distress experienced by the child during NPA collection, as assessed by the child using the Wong-Baker face scale (in a subset of children).

Scale range: 0 (no hurt) - 5 (hurts worst)

Within 3 days of inclusion
Tolerability of NPA collection: 2/ Discomfort/pain/distress experienced by the child as assessed by the parents
Time Frame: Within 3 days of inclusion

Discomfort/pain/distress experienced by the child during NPA collection, as assessed by the parents using the visual analog scale (in a subset of children).

Scale range: 0 (no pain) - 10 (pain as bad as it could possibly be)

Within 3 days of inclusion
Tolerability of NPA collection: 3/ Discomfort/pain/distress experienced by the child as assessed by the nurse
Time Frame: Within 3 days of inclusion

Discomfort/pain/distress experienced by the child during NPA collection, as assessed by the nurses using the "Face Legs Activity Cry Consolability" behavioral pain scale (in a subset of children).

Total score range: 0 (relaxed and comfortable) - 10 (severe discomfort/pain). Each item of the FLACC scale - Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability - has 3 possible quotes: 0 or 1 or 2, with a precise description provided to help with the rating. The total score is obtained by adding individual item scores.

Within 3 days of inclusion
Mortality at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Mortality at 6 months in children with SAM, with or without TB treatment
6 months
Percentage weight gain 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Weight gain and WHZ at 6 months in children with SAM, with or without anti-TB treatment
6 months
TB treatment outcomes
Time Frame: 6 months
TB treatment outcomes as defined per WHO guidelines (Cured, Treatment completed, Treatment failed, Died, Lost to follow-up, Not evaluated, Treatment success)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 4, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 4, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 4, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 27, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tuberculosis

Clinical Trials on Development of a score and algorithm for TB treatment decision in hospitalised children with SAM.

3
Subscribe