Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine in Pediatric Less Than Two Years Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization

June 14, 2021 updated by: Mansoura University

Recovery Profile of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization: a Randomized Double-blind Study

This study hypothesizes that Sugammadex may has more appropriate recovery profile than neostigmine in pediatric cardiac patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. In pediatric cardiac patients, clear and rapid recovery (fast-tracking) is required to maintain hemodynamic within the normal physiological values which may be saved by sugammadex

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

There are numerous advantages of early tracheal extubation otherwise known as fast-tracking following anesthesia for congenital heart disease (CHD)

Early tracheal extubation not only eliminates the potential morbidity related to an endotracheal tube and mechanical ventilation such as atelectasis, accumulation of secretions, nosocomial infections, and the potential for airway trauma, it also limits the need for sedation and the antecedent adverse effects including respiratory and hemodynamic depression, tolerance, withdrawal, and delirium. Most importantly, the shift from positive pressure to spontaneous ventilation augments cardiovascular function and improves preload. Reversal of neuromuscular blockade is a fundamental aspect of emergence from general anesthesia. Historically, the only option to actively reverse blockade will be to administer anticholinesterase inhibitors, which are unable to reverse deep neuromuscular blockade. They are also associated with a variety of cholinergic side effects, including bradycardia, nausea, and increased secretions, which require concomitant administration of an anticholinergic agent, with its own adverse effects. Sugammadex is a newer, selective relaxant binding agent

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Mansoura, DK, Egypt, 050
        • Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 2 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I-III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Legal guardian refusal.
  • Any patients with known drug hypersensitivity.
  • Kidney failure.
  • Liver failure.
  • Diseases affecting the neuromuscular junction.
  • A history of malignant hyperthermia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Reversal Neostigmine
Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization will receive a combination of 0.02 mg/ kg atropine and 0.04 mg/ kg neostigmine following observing the second response on stimulating the ulnar nerve on the TOF watch
Patients will receive 0.02 mg/ kg atropine and 0.04 mg/ kg neostigmine following observing the second response on stimulating the ulnar nerve on the TOF watch
Other Names:
  • PROSTIGMIN®
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Reversal Sugammadex
Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization will receive sugammadex 4 mg/ kg when the T2 is observed on the TOF watch
Interventional Arm Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization will receive sugammadex 4 mg/ kg when the T2 is observed on the TOF watch
Other Names:
  • BRIDION®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reversal efficacy
Time Frame: 90 minutes after endotracheal extubation
Mean time in minutes from start of sugammadex or neostigmine administration to recovery of T4/T1 ratio to 0.9 was assessed by applying repetitive train of four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds and assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. Nerve stimulation continued until the ratio of the magnitude of the fourth twitch (T4) to first twitch (T1) reached at least 0.9
90 minutes after endotracheal extubation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate
Time Frame: assessed basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
assessed basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
Mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
Diastolic arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation ,.just before reversal, and at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
Peripheral oxygen saturation
Time Frame: basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation , just before reversal, at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
basal, after induction, every 15 min during operation , just before reversal, at 1,2,5,7,10,15 minutes after reversal
vomiting
Time Frame: for 24 hour after sugammadex or neostigmine administration
patients monitored for incidence and rate of vomiting by clinical observation in PACU for 24 hours after sugammadex or neostigmine administration .
for 24 hour after sugammadex or neostigmine administration
Anaphylaxis
Time Frame: for 24 hour after sugammadex or neostigmine administration

patients monitored after sugammadex or neostigmine administration for 24 hours postoperative for The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis

Network (FAAN) proposed clinical criteria for diagnosing anaphylaxis . Depending on the severity of the reaction, four grades of immediate clinical manifestations are described:

Grade 1, Cutaneous signs only; Grade 2, Measurable but not life-threatening symptoms and cutaneous signs,hypotension, tachycardia, and respiratory disturbances, such as cough and difficulty in lung inflation; Grade 3, Life-threatening symptoms: collapse, tachycardia or bradycardia, arrhythmias, bronchospasm; Grade 4, Cardiac and/or respiratory arrest

for 24 hour after sugammadex or neostigmine administration
blood glucose
Time Frame: preoperative, 15 minutes before reversal and 30 minutes after reversal
blood glucose in (mg/dL) measured using a GLUCOMETER with strip
preoperative, 15 minutes before reversal and 30 minutes after reversal
prothrombin time
Time Frame: intraoperative and for 60 minutes after sugammadex or neostigmine administration
PT in seconds measured Just before reversal and 60 min after reversal administration.
intraoperative and for 60 minutes after sugammadex or neostigmine administration
activated prothromboplastin time
Time Frame: intraoperative and for 60 minutes after sugammadex or neostigmine administration
APTT in seconds measured Just before reversal and 60 min after reversal administration.
intraoperative and for 60 minutes after sugammadex or neostigmine administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sherif A Mousa, MD, Professor of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care
  • Study Director: Amgad A Zaghloul, MD, Associate Professor of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 27, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 10, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 18, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Following publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

forever

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

ahmed.refaat.rezk@gmail.com

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Catheterization

Clinical Trials on Reversal Neostigmine

Subscribe