Modern Hybrid Imaging in Patients With OSCC (PETOSCC)

February 19, 2020 updated by: Wuerzburg University Hospital

Modern Hybrid Imaging for Staging and Monitoring Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Prospective diagnostic study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative 18F--fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in detecting local tumor extent, cervical lymph node metastases and distant metastases/secondary primary tumor.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

265

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Würzburg, Germany, 97070
        • Department of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity,

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histopathological proven head and neck carcinoma
  • Written inform consent
  • 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer of unknown primary
  • En-bloc resection of lymph node levels
  • Uncertainties regarding the removed lymph node levels

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of FGD-PET/CT to detect the primary tumor
Time Frame: 2013-2018
Visual assessment of FDG-PET/CT will be performed according to current guidelines. The localization, expansion, and infiltration of osseous structures will be recorded. The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis. The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect the primary tumor.
2013-2018
Diagnostic accuracy of FGD-PET/CT to detect lymph nodes metastases
Time Frame: 2013-2018
Visual assessment of FDG-PET/CT will be performed according to current guidelines. The presence and number of nodal metastasis will be recorded for each cervical lymph node level. The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis. The analysis will be performed on a patient level (lymph node metastasis yes/no), on the nodal metastatic involvement of cervical sides and lymph node levels. The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect lymph node metastases.
2013-2018
Diagnostic accuracy of FGD-PET/CT to detect distant lymph node metastases.
Time Frame: 2013-2018
Visual assessment of FDG-PET/CT will be performed according to current guidelines. The presence, localization and number of distant nodal metastasis will be recorded. The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis. The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect lymph node metastases.
2013-2018

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect the primary tumor
Time Frame: 2013-2018
Visual assessment of MRI will be performed according to current guidelines. The localization, expansion, and infiltration of osseous structures will be recorded. The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis. The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect the primary tumor.
2013-2018
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect lymph nodes metastases
Time Frame: 2013-2018
Visual assessment of MRI will be performed according to current guidelines. The presence and number of nodal metastasis will be recorded for each cervical lymph node level. The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis. The analysis will be performed on a patient level (lymph node metastasis yes/no), on the nodal metastatic involvement of cervical sides and lymph node levels. The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect lymph node metastases.
2013-2018
Diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect the primary tumor
Time Frame: 2013-2018
Visual assessment of CT will be performed according to current guidelines. The localization, expansion, and infiltration of osseous structures will be recorded. The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis. The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect the primary tumor.
2013-2018
Diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect lymph nodes metastases
Time Frame: 2013-2018
Visual assessment of CT will be performed according to current guidelines. The presence and number of nodal metastasis will be recorded for each cervical lymph node level. The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis. The analysis will be performed on a patient level (lymph node metastasis yes/no), on the nodal metastatic involvement of cervical sides and lymph node levels. The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect lymph node metastases.
2013-2018
Diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect distant lymph node metastases.
Time Frame: 2013-2018
Visual assessment of CT will be performed according to current guidelines. The presence, localization and number of distant nodal metastasis will be recorded. The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis. The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect lymph node metastases.
2013-2018

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Urs Müller-Richter, MD, DDS, PhD, Dpt. of CMF, University Hospital Wuerzburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PETOSCC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasm

3
Subscribe