- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04280159
Modern Hybrid Imaging in Patients With OSCC (PETOSCC)
February 19, 2020 updated by: Wuerzburg University Hospital
Modern Hybrid Imaging for Staging and Monitoring Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Prospective diagnostic study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative 18F--fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in detecting local tumor extent, cervical lymph node metastases and distant metastases/secondary primary tumor.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
265
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Würzburg, Germany, 97070
- Department of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity,
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histopathological proven head and neck carcinoma
- Written inform consent
- 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cancer of unknown primary
- En-bloc resection of lymph node levels
- Uncertainties regarding the removed lymph node levels
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Diagnostic accuracy of FGD-PET/CT to detect the primary tumor
Time Frame: 2013-2018
|
Visual assessment of FDG-PET/CT will be performed according to current guidelines.
The localization, expansion, and infiltration of osseous structures will be recorded.
The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis.
The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect the primary tumor.
|
2013-2018
|
Diagnostic accuracy of FGD-PET/CT to detect lymph nodes metastases
Time Frame: 2013-2018
|
Visual assessment of FDG-PET/CT will be performed according to current guidelines.
The presence and number of nodal metastasis will be recorded for each cervical lymph node level.
The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis.
The analysis will be performed on a patient level (lymph node metastasis yes/no), on the nodal metastatic involvement of cervical sides and lymph node levels.
The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect lymph node metastases.
|
2013-2018
|
Diagnostic accuracy of FGD-PET/CT to detect distant lymph node metastases.
Time Frame: 2013-2018
|
Visual assessment of FDG-PET/CT will be performed according to current guidelines.
The presence, localization and number of distant nodal metastasis will be recorded.
The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis.
The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect lymph node metastases.
|
2013-2018
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect the primary tumor
Time Frame: 2013-2018
|
Visual assessment of MRI will be performed according to current guidelines.
The localization, expansion, and infiltration of osseous structures will be recorded.
The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis.
The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect the primary tumor.
|
2013-2018
|
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect lymph nodes metastases
Time Frame: 2013-2018
|
Visual assessment of MRI will be performed according to current guidelines.
The presence and number of nodal metastasis will be recorded for each cervical lymph node level.
The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis.
The analysis will be performed on a patient level (lymph node metastasis yes/no), on the nodal metastatic involvement of cervical sides and lymph node levels.
The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect lymph node metastases.
|
2013-2018
|
Diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect the primary tumor
Time Frame: 2013-2018
|
Visual assessment of CT will be performed according to current guidelines.
The localization, expansion, and infiltration of osseous structures will be recorded.
The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis.
The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect the primary tumor.
|
2013-2018
|
Diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect lymph nodes metastases
Time Frame: 2013-2018
|
Visual assessment of CT will be performed according to current guidelines.
The presence and number of nodal metastasis will be recorded for each cervical lymph node level.
The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis.
The analysis will be performed on a patient level (lymph node metastasis yes/no), on the nodal metastatic involvement of cervical sides and lymph node levels.
The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect lymph node metastases.
|
2013-2018
|
Diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect distant lymph node metastases.
Time Frame: 2013-2018
|
Visual assessment of CT will be performed according to current guidelines.
The presence, localization and number of distant nodal metastasis will be recorded.
The outcome measure is the correct diagnosis (1 = correct; 0 = false) with regards to the histopathological analysis.
The outcome measure will then be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of CT to detect lymph node metastases.
|
2013-2018
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Urs Müller-Richter, MD, DDS, PhD, Dpt. of CMF, University Hospital Wuerzburg
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 28, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 19, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
February 21, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 21, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 19, 2020
Last Verified
February 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- PETOSCC
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neoplasm
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedMetastatic Malignant Neoplasm | Unresectable Malignant Neoplasm | Advanced Malignant NeoplasmUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingAdvanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Liver | Unresectable Solid NeoplasmUnited States, Canada
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingAdvanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Refractory Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Unresectable Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Metastatic Malignant Solid NeoplasmUnited States
-
Ronald LevyBristol-Myers SquibbCompletedAdvanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Extracranial Solid NeoplasmUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruitingMalignant Neoplasm | Benign NeoplasmUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingRefractory Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Unresectable Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Metastatic Malignant Solid NeoplasmUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingMetastatic Malignant Neoplasm | Advanced Malignant Neoplasm | Recurrent Malignant Neoplasm | Refractory Malignant Neoplasm | Locally Advanced Malignant NeoplasmUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingRefractory Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Unresectable Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Metastatic Malignant Solid NeoplasmUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingAdvanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Unresectable Malignant Solid Neoplasm | Metastatic Malignant Solid NeoplasmUnited States, Canada
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterBristol-Myers Squibb; National Cancer Institute (NCI); Eunice Kennedy Shriver... and other collaboratorsCompletedChildhood Solid Neoplasm | Metastatic Neoplasm | Adult Solid NeoplasmUnited States