Financial Distress in Advanced Cancer Patients

October 27, 2023 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Frequency and Correlates of Financial Distress in Advanced Cancer Patients

This trial studies the severity of financial distress in advanced cancer patients. The cost of cancer care can often be very expensive. Financial distress from the burdens of high costs and debt may interfere with a patient's physical symptoms and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the frequency of high financial distress in advanced cancer patients.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the association between high financial distress with clinical and demographic characteristics in advanced cancer patients.

II. To determine the correlation between In Charge Financial Distress/ Financial Well-Being Scale (IFDFW) and other financial distress instruments such as Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale- Financial Distress (ESAS-FS).

III. To determine the association between high financial distress with patient symptoms in ESAS-FS and quality of life assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G).

OUTLINE:

Patients complete questionnaires about financial state and quality of life over 15 minutes. Patients' medical chart is also reviewed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

141

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with a diagnosis of advanced cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must have a diagnosis of advanced cancer, as defined by recurrent disease, locally advanced disease, metastatic disease, or refractory disease
  • Patients must be able to understand, read, write, and speak English
  • Patients must have no clinical evidence of severe cognitive impairment (Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale score of >= 13) and should be able to consent and answer the questionnaires
  • Patients must sign an informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Observational (questionnaire administration)
Patients complete questionnaires about financial state and quality of life over 15 minutes. Patients' medical chart is also reviewed.
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Medical chart is reviewed
Other Names:
  • Chart Review

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale (IFDFW),
Time Frame: Day 1
a validated survey designed to measure a person's financial state, consists of eight questions and each of them is rated from 1 (overwhelming stress) to 10 (no stress at all). This should take approximately 5 minutes to complete.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between high financial distress with clinical characteristics in advance cancer patients
Time Frame: Day 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics,such as your age, gender, ethnicity, caregiving, education, employment status, marital status, household income, date of diagnosis, disease stage, cancer type, insurance type, place of residence, and homeowner status) will be collected. It should take about 5 minutes to complete.
Day 1
Correlation between mean scores of In Charge Financial Distress/ Financial Well-Being Scale (IFDFW) and scores from other financial distress instruments
Time Frame: Day 1
Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) was developed as part of a series of questionnaires aimed at measuring different symptom indexes of health-related quality of life in patients with advance disease such as cancer. The survey contains 12 questions and each of them is rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). This survey focuses on financial distress caused by illness in patients with cancer. It takes about 5 minutes to complete.
Day 1
Correlation between high financial distress with patient symptoms in(ESAS) Edmonton Symptom Assessment System
Time Frame: Day 1
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale- Financial Distress (ESAS-FS) is routinely utilized in the outpatient Supportive Care Clinic. The ESAS-FS is an updated version including financial and spiritual distress, and it consists of 12 symptom items to measure severity severity of patient's symptoms. Grading severity of patient symptoms from "no" 0 to "worst symptom" 10 in the last 24 hours.
Day 1
Correlation between high financial distress with Quality of life
Time Frame: Day 1
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G). consists of 27 general questions divided into four primary domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being for use in patients with any form of cancer. Answered using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much) With a total possible score greater than 100.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacqueline Tschanz, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-0694 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2019-03869 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Quality-of-Life Assessment

3
Subscribe