Heart Failure Study to Evaluate Vital Signs and Overcome Low Use of Guideline-Directed Therapy by Remote Monitoring (HF-eVOLUTION)

August 4, 2023 updated by: Amgen

A Randomized, Open-Label, Standard-of-Care-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Digital Health Data Use in Managing Guideline-Directed Heart Failure Therapy

A study evaluating the impact of remotely collected data, measured using digital technologies, on the use of guideline-recommended heart failure therapy in adult participants with heart failure.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
        • Yale New Haven Hospital
      • Stamford, Connecticut, United States, 06905
        • Cardiology Associates of Fairfield County, PC
    • Iowa
      • Waterloo, Iowa, United States, 50702
        • MercyOne Northeast Iowa Family Medicine and Residency
    • New Jersey
      • Voorhees, New Jersey, United States, 08043
        • Virtua Health Inc.
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37404
        • Diagnostic Cardiology Group
      • Tullahoma, Tennessee, United States, 37388
        • Tennessee Center for Clinical Trials, a division of Cardiology and Vascular Associates PLLC
    • Virginia
      • Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
        • Inova Heart and Vascular Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of chronic heart failure.
  • Ejection fraction equal to or below 40%.
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to class III.
  • Enrollment during or within 30 days after a hospitalization, emergency department, or urgent, unscheduled clinic/office visit with primary diagnosis of heart failure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has received a major organ transplant (e.g., lung, liver, heart, bone marrow, kidney).
  • Currently in an investigational device or drug study.
  • Unwilling or unable to wear a digital wrist watch device for measuring blood pressure and other parameters during waking hours.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Standard of Care
Standard of care procedures and therapies for managing heart failure will be carried out according to each investigator's standard procedures.
Experimental: Digital Health Tools + Standard of Care
Standard of care procedures and therapies for managing heart failure will be carried out according to each investigator's standard procedures. In addition, participants will be provided with a Biobeat wrist watch for continuous measurement and reporting of blood pressure data and with a smartphone to report weight.
Standard of care procedures and therapies for managing heart failure will be carried out according to each investigator's standard procedures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Change or Decision That Heart Failure Therapy is Optimal
Time Frame: Randomization to 6 months
Area under the curve (AUC) will be calculated for a daily dose-related medication score for beta-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker/angiotensin neprilysin inhibitor, and aldosterone antagonist therapy.
Randomization to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to change or decision that heart failure therapy is optimal
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Area under the curve (AUC) will be calculated for a daily dose-related medication score for beta-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker/angiotensin neprilysin inhibitor, and aldosterone antagonist therapy, time to change or decision that dose is optimal.
Baseline to 6 months
Numerical Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale for Healthcare Provider Scores (Health-ITUES-HCP)
Time Frame: Week 24
Health-ITUES-HCP will be used to assess the healthcare provider's experience with the digital health tool(s) and data presentation. The scale consists of 36 items. A higher score indicated higher perceived usability of the technology.
Week 24
Numerical Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale for Participants (Health-ITUES-Subject) Scores
Time Frame: Week 24
Health-ITUES-Subject will be used to assess the participant's experience with the digital health tool(s). The scale consists of 36 items. A higher score indicated higher perceived usability of the technology.
Week 24
Change in Numerical Rating of Subject Satisfaction with Heart Failure Therapy
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Participants will complete a subject satisfaction survey (5 point Likert scale format) ranging from very satisfied to very dissatisfied.
Baseline and Week 24
Change from Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23) Scores
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
The KCCQ-23 is a 23-item questionnaire to measure the participant's perception of their health status, which includes heart failure symptoms, impact on physical and social function, and how their heart failure impacts their quality of life. All items are measured on a Likert scale with 5-7 response options. Scores for each item are standardized to range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health status, fewer symptoms, and greater disease-specific health-related quality of life.
Baseline and Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: MD, Amgen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20180096

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors. If not approved, a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel will arbitrate and make the final decision. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the URL below.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Biobeat Wrist Watch

3
Subscribe