- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04294602
Efficacy Of Different Types Of Physiotherapy Approaches In Temporomandibular Disorders
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
59 persons with TMD diagnosed by the dentist and with cervical myofascial pain, aged 18-30 years will be randomly allocated, 3 groups. The participants were randomly allocated only exercise group (EG) (n=20), low-level laser therapy plus exercise group (LLLT) (n=17) and manual pressure release plus exercise group (MPR) (n=22). The cases were evaluated and treated by the same physiotherapist for 4 weeks (12 sessions).
Pain, pain pressure threshold, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility and disability, forward head posture, head rotation, neck disability, psychological status and quality of life were evaluated. Evaluations were repeated before and after treatment.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maltepe
-
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey, 34000
- Marmara University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cases who have 3 or more symptoms related to TMJ problems
- cases who have trigger points in cervical and masticatory muscles
- cases who TMD detected by the dentist,
- being between the ages of 18-30,
- volunteer to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a positive history of trauma in the face and neck area and neurological disorders
- patients undergoing TMJ or cervical region surgery in the last 3 months,
- patients who used dental orthotics within 1 month,
- patients who have TMJ instability,
- patients who have cervical and upper thoracic region,
- patients who have active infection and chronic pain, such as trigeminal neuralgia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Exercise Program
This group received therapeutic exercises and patient education.
For patients to encounter fewer problems and to reduce their problems, some recommendations were made that should be taken into consideration in daily life.
These suggestions were given in writing.
The exercise program included muscle stretching, massage of painful muscles, guided opening and closing movements, gentle isometric tension exercises against resistance, correction of body posture and relaxation techniques.
All exercises were done in 6 repetitions a set, 3 sets a day, 3 days a week, treatment program lasted 4 weeks.
|
Exercise therapy intended in reducing muscle spasm, improving coordination of the mastication muscles and alter the jaw closure pattern.
Some suggestions were made to TMD people who should pay attention to in daily life.
These suggestions were given in writing.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Low Level Laser Therapy Program
This group received LLLT, therapeutic exercises and patient education in the therapy programs.
LLLT (max output power: 1200mW, wavelength: 808 nm, dosage: 10j/ cm2 Electronica Pagani Laser Tower Light, Italy) 2.5-4j/TrP dosage was applied to MTrP or sensitive points.
The application was applied to MTrP or sensitive points in the mastication and cervical muscles.LLLT program was done in 3 days a week, the treatment program lasted 4 weeks.
|
Exercise therapy intended in reducing muscle spasm, improving coordination of the mastication muscles and alter the jaw closure pattern.
Some suggestions were made to TMD people who should pay attention to in daily life.
These suggestions were given in writing.
LLLT (max output power: 1200mW, wavelength: 808 nm, dosage: 10j/ cm2 Electronica Pagani Laser Tower Light, Italy) 2.5-4j/TrP dosage was applied to MTrP or sensitive points.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Manual Pressure Release Program
ThisThis group received manual pressure release (MPR), therapeutic exercises and patient education in the therapy programs.
MPR technique is a noninvasive method based on pressure on the trigger point in accordance with the patient's tolerance and technique applies supine position relax as much as possible, MTrPs in the mastication and neck muscle.
Applied pressure gradually with finger over the MTrPs until the subject reported a 'moderate but easily tolerable' pain value of 7 out of 10.
When the pain value decreased to at least 3 or 4 therapist increased pressure again until discomfort and/or pain appeared again.
This process was repeated until there was no MTrP tension/tenderness or 60 s had elapsed.
MPR program was done in 3 days a week, the treatment program lasted 4 weeks.
|
Exercise therapy intended in reducing muscle spasm, improving coordination of the mastication muscles and alter the jaw closure pattern.
Some suggestions were made to TMD people who should pay attention to in daily life.
These suggestions were given in writing.
MPR technique is a noninvasive method based on pressure on the trigger point in accordance with the patient's tolerance and technique applies supine position relax as much as possible, manuel pressure applied trigger point in neck and mactication muscles
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pressure Pain Threshold Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline pressure pain threshold score in neck and mastication muscles at week 4.
|
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) of an individual's mastication and cervical muscle was measured with an algometer (JTECH Medical Industries, CommanderTMAlgometer), and the applied pressure was increased to 1 cm2/ kg per second.
PPT measurements were repeated three times and the average was used for analysis in every participant.
|
Change from baseline pressure pain threshold score in neck and mastication muscles at week 4.
|
Pain Severity Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline TMJ pain and intensity of head pain, TMJ noise and jaw locking score at week 4.
|
To evaluate the general pain severity of the patients, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which is the Visual Pain Scale of Turkish, was used.
Patients were asked to mark their general pain separately on a 10 cm scale.
According to this, "0" indicates that there is no pain, and "10" indicates the most severe pain.
The distance between the marked point and the beginning of the line was recorded in centimeters
|
Change from baseline TMJ pain and intensity of head pain, TMJ noise and jaw locking score at week 4.
|
Jaw Movements Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline MMO and lateral deviation score at week 4.
|
Maximum mouth opening (MMO) and lateral deviation were measured with a caliper.
|
Change from baseline MMO and lateral deviation score at week 4.
|
Neck Movements Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline cervical rotations and craniovertebral angle score at week 4.
|
Cervical rotations and the craniovertebral angle between C7 and tragus were measured by a goniometer.
|
Change from baseline cervical rotations and craniovertebral angle score at week 4.
|
Temporomandibular Disorder Severity
Time Frame: Change from baseline temporomandibular disorder severity score at week 4
|
The TMD severity in participation is defined by the Craniomandibular Index (CMI) which was developed to provide a standardized measure to the severity of problems in mandibular movement, muscle, and joint tenderness and TMJ noise for use in epidemiological and clinical outcome studies.
The instrument was designed to have clearly defined objective criteria, simple clinical methods, and ease in scoring; it is divided into the Palpation Index (PI) and the Dysfunction Index (DI).
The means of the subscales were averaged to produce a CMI score ranging from 0 (best) to 1 (worst)
|
Change from baseline temporomandibular disorder severity score at week 4
|
Quality of Life Assesment
Time Frame: Change from baseline quality of life score at week 4
|
Short Form-36 questionnaire contains the physical and mental component, which is evaluated, is close to 100, indicating an increase in health-related quality of life.
The means SF-36 score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
|
Change from baseline quality of life score at week 4
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Neck Disability Assesment
Time Frame: Change from baseline neck disability score at week 4.
|
Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire; Neck pain severity, neck pain and sleep, numbness and tingling in the arms at night, duration of symptoms and complaints, weight-bearing, reading and watching television, work and housework, social activities and driving includes 9 items.
Each item consists of 5 options, the level of disability increases as you approach 36 points.
The means northwick park neck pain questionnaire score ranging from 0 (best) to 36 (worst).
|
Change from baseline neck disability score at week 4.
|
Psychological Status Assesment
Time Frame: Change from baseline psychological status score at week 4.
|
Beck depression index which is a two-factor scale, emotion and somatic, has 21 questions, the lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 3 in each question.
The means Beck depression index score ranging from 0 (best) to 63 (worst).
|
Change from baseline psychological status score at week 4.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BitlisErenU1
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Disorder
-
CES UniversityCompletedTemporomandibular Disorder | Children, Only | Pain Disorder | Joint Disorder, Temporomandibular
-
University of AlcalaCompletedTemporomandibular DisorderSpain
-
University of Nove de JulhoUnknownTemporomandibular DisorderBrazil
-
Beirut Arab UniversityRecruitingTemporomandibular DisorderLebanon
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingTemporomandibular DisorderPakistan
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanCompletedTemporomandibular DisorderEgypt
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompleted
-
Federal University of Rio Grande do SulCompletedTemporomandibular Disorder
-
University of Nove de JulhoCompleted
-
University of Sao PauloConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCompletedTemporomandibular DisorderBrazil
Clinical Trials on Exercise
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterRecruiting
-
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and...TerminatedTraumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
University of Texas, El PasoRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Pain Chronic | Central Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteCompletedAcute Myeloid LeukemiaCanada
-
Sahmyook UniversityRecruitingChronic Nonspecific Neck PainKorea, Republic of
-
University of AlbertaWomen and Children's Health Research Institute, CanadaRecruitingType 1 Diabetes | Post-menopauseCanada
-
Uskudar UniversityCompleted
-
Yuksek Ihtisas UniversityCompletedDementia | Frailty | Cognitive Function | Reaction Time | Aerobic Exercise | Balance ExerciseTurkey
-
National Taiwan Normal UniversityCompletedAging | Cognitive DeclineTaiwan
-
Wayne State UniversityUnknown