Efficacy Of Different Types Of Physiotherapy Approaches In Temporomandibular Disorders

March 2, 2020 updated by: Abdurrahman Tanhan, Bitlis Eren University
The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of different types of physiotherapy approaches in cases with cervical myofascial painful TMD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

59 persons with TMD diagnosed by the dentist and with cervical myofascial pain, aged 18-30 years will be randomly allocated, 3 groups. The participants were randomly allocated only exercise group (EG) (n=20), low-level laser therapy plus exercise group (LLLT) (n=17) and manual pressure release plus exercise group (MPR) (n=22). The cases were evaluated and treated by the same physiotherapist for 4 weeks (12 sessions).

Pain, pain pressure threshold, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility and disability, forward head posture, head rotation, neck disability, psychological status and quality of life were evaluated. Evaluations were repeated before and after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maltepe
      • Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey, 34000
        • Marmara University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cases who have 3 or more symptoms related to TMJ problems
  • cases who have trigger points in cervical and masticatory muscles
  • cases who TMD detected by the dentist,
  • being between the ages of 18-30,
  • volunteer to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a positive history of trauma in the face and neck area and neurological disorders
  • patients undergoing TMJ or cervical region surgery in the last 3 months,
  • patients who used dental orthotics within 1 month,
  • patients who have TMJ instability,
  • patients who have cervical and upper thoracic region,
  • patients who have active infection and chronic pain, such as trigeminal neuralgia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Exercise Program
This group received therapeutic exercises and patient education. For patients to encounter fewer problems and to reduce their problems, some recommendations were made that should be taken into consideration in daily life. These suggestions were given in writing. The exercise program included muscle stretching, massage of painful muscles, guided opening and closing movements, gentle isometric tension exercises against resistance, correction of body posture and relaxation techniques. All exercises were done in 6 repetitions a set, 3 sets a day, 3 days a week, treatment program lasted 4 weeks.
Exercise therapy intended in reducing muscle spasm, improving coordination of the mastication muscles and alter the jaw closure pattern.
Some suggestions were made to TMD people who should pay attention to in daily life. These suggestions were given in writing.
EXPERIMENTAL: Low Level Laser Therapy Program
This group received LLLT, therapeutic exercises and patient education in the therapy programs. LLLT (max output power: 1200mW, wavelength: 808 nm, dosage: 10j/ cm2 Electronica Pagani Laser Tower Light, Italy) 2.5-4j/TrP dosage was applied to MTrP or sensitive points. The application was applied to MTrP or sensitive points in the mastication and cervical muscles.LLLT program was done in 3 days a week, the treatment program lasted 4 weeks.
Exercise therapy intended in reducing muscle spasm, improving coordination of the mastication muscles and alter the jaw closure pattern.
Some suggestions were made to TMD people who should pay attention to in daily life. These suggestions were given in writing.
LLLT (max output power: 1200mW, wavelength: 808 nm, dosage: 10j/ cm2 Electronica Pagani Laser Tower Light, Italy) 2.5-4j/TrP dosage was applied to MTrP or sensitive points.
EXPERIMENTAL: Manual Pressure Release Program
ThisThis group received manual pressure release (MPR), therapeutic exercises and patient education in the therapy programs. MPR technique is a noninvasive method based on pressure on the trigger point in accordance with the patient's tolerance and technique applies supine position relax as much as possible, MTrPs in the mastication and neck muscle. Applied pressure gradually with finger over the MTrPs until the subject reported a 'moderate but easily tolerable' pain value of 7 out of 10. When the pain value decreased to at least 3 or 4 therapist increased pressure again until discomfort and/or pain appeared again. This process was repeated until there was no MTrP tension/tenderness or 60 s had elapsed. MPR program was done in 3 days a week, the treatment program lasted 4 weeks.
Exercise therapy intended in reducing muscle spasm, improving coordination of the mastication muscles and alter the jaw closure pattern.
Some suggestions were made to TMD people who should pay attention to in daily life. These suggestions were given in writing.
MPR technique is a noninvasive method based on pressure on the trigger point in accordance with the patient's tolerance and technique applies supine position relax as much as possible, manuel pressure applied trigger point in neck and mactication muscles

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pressure Pain Threshold Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline pressure pain threshold score in neck and mastication muscles at week 4.
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) of an individual's mastication and cervical muscle was measured with an algometer (JTECH Medical Industries, CommanderTMAlgometer), and the applied pressure was increased to 1 cm2/ kg per second. PPT measurements were repeated three times and the average was used for analysis in every participant.
Change from baseline pressure pain threshold score in neck and mastication muscles at week 4.
Pain Severity Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline TMJ pain and intensity of head pain, TMJ noise and jaw locking score at week 4.
To evaluate the general pain severity of the patients, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which is the Visual Pain Scale of Turkish, was used. Patients were asked to mark their general pain separately on a 10 cm scale. According to this, "0" indicates that there is no pain, and "10" indicates the most severe pain. The distance between the marked point and the beginning of the line was recorded in centimeters
Change from baseline TMJ pain and intensity of head pain, TMJ noise and jaw locking score at week 4.
Jaw Movements Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline MMO and lateral deviation score at week 4.
Maximum mouth opening (MMO) and lateral deviation were measured with a caliper.
Change from baseline MMO and lateral deviation score at week 4.
Neck Movements Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline cervical rotations and craniovertebral angle score at week 4.
Cervical rotations and the craniovertebral angle between C7 and tragus were measured by a goniometer.
Change from baseline cervical rotations and craniovertebral angle score at week 4.
Temporomandibular Disorder Severity
Time Frame: Change from baseline temporomandibular disorder severity score at week 4
The TMD severity in participation is defined by the Craniomandibular Index (CMI) which was developed to provide a standardized measure to the severity of problems in mandibular movement, muscle, and joint tenderness and TMJ noise for use in epidemiological and clinical outcome studies. The instrument was designed to have clearly defined objective criteria, simple clinical methods, and ease in scoring; it is divided into the Palpation Index (PI) and the Dysfunction Index (DI). The means of the subscales were averaged to produce a CMI score ranging from 0 (best) to 1 (worst)
Change from baseline temporomandibular disorder severity score at week 4
Quality of Life Assesment
Time Frame: Change from baseline quality of life score at week 4
Short Form-36 questionnaire contains the physical and mental component, which is evaluated, is close to 100, indicating an increase in health-related quality of life. The means SF-36 score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Change from baseline quality of life score at week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck Disability Assesment
Time Frame: Change from baseline neck disability score at week 4.
Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire; Neck pain severity, neck pain and sleep, numbness and tingling in the arms at night, duration of symptoms and complaints, weight-bearing, reading and watching television, work and housework, social activities and driving includes 9 items. Each item consists of 5 options, the level of disability increases as you approach 36 points. The means northwick park neck pain questionnaire score ranging from 0 (best) to 36 (worst).
Change from baseline neck disability score at week 4.
Psychological Status Assesment
Time Frame: Change from baseline psychological status score at week 4.
Beck depression index which is a two-factor scale, emotion and somatic, has 21 questions, the lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 3 in each question. The means Beck depression index score ranging from 0 (best) to 63 (worst).
Change from baseline psychological status score at week 4.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 15, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 13, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Disorder

Clinical Trials on Exercise

3
Subscribe