Effectiveness of Pre-medical Consultation Diabetes Self-care Education Programme on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes (PMC-SEP)

September 22, 2019 updated by: LAU Siu Wai Maggie, Chinese University of Hong Kong

The Effectiveness of Pre-medical Consultation (PMC) Diabetes Self-care Education Programme on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

This proposed project is a prospective randomized controlled trial to examine the clinical effects of pre-medical consultation structured diabetes self-care education program on intervention group (IG) versus control group (CG) for patients with type 2 diabetes in a specialist outpatient clinic of a regional hospital.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Protocol Revised Date: 23 April 2019

Introduction Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is known as one of the major causes leading to cardiovascular diseases, stroke, diabetes kidney diseases, blindness or non-traumatic lower limb amputations. It is estimated that one in ten people to have diabetes and it has been projected that one in three adults will develop type 2 diabetes by 2050. Similarly, the prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Hong Kong is estimated to be one in ten in adult population.

DM is a progressive metabolic disease and necessitates continuous medical care, diabetes self-management education and skills training to prevent or delay development of acute and chronic complications. Educating patients with diabetes in self blood glucose monitoring, healthy eating, regular physical activities, medication adherence, stress management and smoking cessation are important behavioral modifications required in diabetes self-care education. Besides providing education, diabetes nurses provide support and discuss with patients regarding their concerns and worries about diabetes and empower them to live their life positively with diabetes.

The Service Gap

Patients with diabetes with or without cardiovascular or renal comorbidities, are inevitably a burden to healthcare system. In Hong Kong and most other countries, if not all, patients are referred to specialist out-patient clinics (SOPC) for more advanced diabetes management from either general out-patient clinics (GOPC) or private practitioners (GP). Hence, these new case referrals from GOPC or GP are patients already have established DM on oral anti-diabetic drugs and/or insulin injections and with diabetes complications. Nevertheless, they have to wait for a long period of time, approximately one to two years before they could be seen at SOPC.

The role of a diabetes nurse is recognized as providing diabetes education, individualized care, self-care promotion, teaching physical skills and enhancing psychological support. However, majority of DM patients are being first seen at general medical clinics, and only a proportion of them will be referred by case medical practitioner to diabetes nurses for education. In other words, the role of the diabetes nurses is quite 'passive' and the basic education program may fail to cover all newly referred patients.

According to Hospital Authority (HA) report, the waiting time for stable case new case booking in medicine specialist out-patient clinics from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018 is the median 94 weeks (= 24 months = 2 years) to the longest 119 weeks (= 30 months = 2.5 years) for first time medical consultation at SOPC. Most of them are with suboptimal glycemic control and/or co-morbidities, such as retinopathy or renal impairment at time of referral made and necessitate earlier medical management. Burden of diabetes on public health care system in Hong Kong is alarming. The number of patients with diabetes increased over 9,000 (31.5%) in five years from 2010 to 2015, with around 200,000 admissions for diabetes-related complications, which accounts for 18% of all admissions and around one million SOPC visits, which accounts for 14% of all SOPC attendance.

Thus, the clinical triggers are:

  1. What is the impact of delivering pre-medical consultation nursing intervention or diabetes education to these newly referred patients with type 2 diabetes at SOPC?
  2. What are the effects of early nursing consultation and diabetes self-care education on glycemic control and self-care in patients with type 2 diabetes?

Hypothesis Pre-medical consultation structured diabetes self-care education programme can provide significantly greater improvements in glycemic control and self-care behaviors in adults with type 2 diabetes than usual care.

Objectives

  1. To evaluate the effectiveness of pre-medical consultation structured diabetes self-care education programme on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes.
  2. To assess the effectiveness of pre-medical consultation structured diabetes self-care education programme on diabetes-specific self-care behaviors.
  3. To examine acceptability and usefulness of the intervention protocol by conducting a focus group interview on the intervention group.

Proposed evidence-based intervention protocol The findings of integrative review revealed positive effects of diabetes education in improving glycemic control and promoting self-care among adults with type 2 diabetes. An evidence-based protocol is developed based on these findings to generate a structured diabetes self-care education programme for newly referred patients before their first medical consultation at SOPC to improve glycemic control and enhance self-care in adults with type 2 diabetes in Hong Kong.

Study design This will be a randomized controlled trial to examine the effects and acceptability of a structured diabetes self-care education programme for type 2 diabetes patients as an intervention group (IG) versus a control group (CG) of usual care in a specialist out-patient clinic of a regional hospital.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Territories
      • Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Diabetes Centre, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Siu Wai Maggie LAU, MPhil

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 Diabetes, age above 18 years old, who are 'newly referred' (established as well as newly diagnosed of DM) to specialist out-patient clinic at Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital
  • Suboptimal glycemic control of glycosylated haemoglobin, HbA1c >7%
  • Chinese and literate, able to answer questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent.
  • Poor glycemic control with glycosylated haemoglobin, HbA1c >12% and/or related complications will receive early medical appointment or require hospital admission.
  • Having advanced diabetes related complications, e.g. diabetes kidney disease with glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.72m2
  • Life threatening condition with reduced life expectancy such as patients with cancer at terminal stage.
  • Those with active mental disorders and learning disability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Usual care
Active Comparator: Intervention group
Pre-medical consultation structured diabetes self-care education programme

The findings of integrative review revealed positive effects of DSME in improving glycemic control and promoting self-care among people with type 2 diabetes.

An evidence-based protocol is developed based on these findings to generate a DSME program for newly referred patients to SOPCs and before their first medical consultation to improve glycemic control and enhance self-care of people with type 2 diabetes in Hong Kong. The investigator will ensure that this study is conducted in compliance with ICH-GCP and in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Blood Glycosylated haemoglobin, HbA1c at 6 months
Time Frame: At baseline, week 24.
Blood HbA1c will be taken at baseline diabetes complication screening, week 24 for both IG and CG.
At baseline, week 24.
Change from Baseline Blood Glycosylated haemoglobin, HbA1c at 9 months
Time Frame: At baseline, week 36.
Blood HbA1c will be taken at baseline diabetes complication screening week 36 for both IG and CG.
At baseline, week 36.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Chinese version of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale Questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline, week 24 and week 36.
The Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale Questionnaire (C-DMSES) is a 20-item scale that assesses diabetes self-care, including blood glucose monitoring, dietary adherence and physical activity adherence. Participants are asked to read each of the 20 items and rate on a 0-10 Likert scale. Higher scale scores indicate better self-care behavior. This scale has been validated and shown satisfactory reliability (r=0.86) in research.
At baseline, week 24 and week 36.
The Chinese version of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale Questionnaire - Short Form
Time Frame: At baseline, week 24 and week 36.
The Chinese version of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale Questionnaire (C-DES) is a 10-item scale and includes five subscales: overcoming barriers, achieving goals, coping, determining suitable methods and obtaining support. Participants are asked to rate each of the 10 items on a 0-5 Likert scale. Higher scale scores indicate better self-efficacy. This scale has been validated and shown satisfactory reliability (r=0.95) in study.
At baseline, week 24 and week 36.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Siu Wai Maggie LAU, MPhil, Chinese Univeristy of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Pre-medical consultation structured diabetes self-care education programme

3
Subscribe