The Role of Dopaminergic and Noradrenergic Neurotransmission in Value- and Salience-based Decision-Making

April 29, 2020 updated by: University of Zurich
Approach versus avoidance decisions are at the centre of adaptive behaviour and survival. These decisions are thought to be guided by the value of the choice options, which are a function of the magnitude of predicted rewards and punishments. Moreover, the allocation of attention to choice options is thought to be driven by salience, i.e. the overall importance of the predicted outcomes. While salience increases with the magnitude of both predicted rewards and predicted punishments, value increases with reward but decreases with punishment. In previous research, value and salience have often remained confounded during value-based decision making. Rodent research suggests that value is associated with dopamine and salience with norepinephrine. The present study aims at disentangling value from salience processing during decision-making tasks in healthy subjects by administering dopamine or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. This is done by using a single dose challenge in a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design, administering either methylphenidate (35 mg), reboxetine (8 mg), or placebo to healthy young participants before they perform tasks tapping into various aspects of value and salience.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8006
        • University of Zurich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 33 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physically and psychiatrically healthy men and women aged ≥ 18- ≤ 35 years
  • Ability and willingness to participate in the study
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious past brain disease or injury (data quality)
  • Frequent headaches (of any sort, > 1/week) or migraine (irrespective of frequency)
  • History of epileptic seizures
  • Any neurological disorder
  • Surgery to head or heart (safety, potential metal pieces)
  • Pacemaker, hearing aid or neurostimulator (safety, metal pieces)
  • Known cardiac or cardiovascular disease or anomaly
  • Family history of sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmia
  • High or low blood pressure, history of heart attack, infrequent heartbeat
  • Respiratory problems (including difficulty with breathing through the nose)
  • Glaucoma (present or in history)
  • Insufficiency of kidney or liver, acute liver disease
  • Any psychiatric disorder (especially depression, mania, schizophrenia, addiction and suicidality)
  • Severe vocal or motor tics (methylphenidate, data quality)
  • Severe psychosomatic disorder (somatic complaints without clear medical cause, has a mental component)
  • Pregnancy, nursing, or currently planned pregnancy
  • Current allergy in general or allergy to methylphenidate or reboxetine
  • Severe intolerance to lactose including strong diarrhea after only a few mg (weak lactose intolerance is no exclusion criterion as medication only contains slightest dosage (around 4mg) of lactose)
  • Currently taking any medication that might interfere with Methylphenidate and Reboxetine, especially MAO-Inhibitors (e.g. Aurorix (Moclobemid) und Azilect (Rasagilin), antipsychotics, antibiotics, and medication for heart diseases
  • Currently taking any further medication (besides birth control) or natural products (infrequent intake of natural products and/or food supplements need to be mentioned to the examiner)
  • Drug abuse (current or past abuse; in case of single use please inform the examiner)
  • Serious acute or chronic disease that could interfere with participation in the experiments
  • Inability to understand the instructions or insufficient comprehension of German language
  • Participants having their weight outside of the range of ≥ 60 kg - ≤ 80 kg
  • Clinically relevant score in STAI T (anxiety), measured during prescreening on a separate day
  • Long QT syndrome or other arrhythmias, measured during prescreening on a separate day

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dopamine reuptake inhibitor
Participants in the dopamine reuptake inhibitor group will be asked to take one pill containing 35 mg methylphenidate 1.5 hours before performing the tasks.
35 mg methylphenidate (Ritalin®) is administered once using a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design
Other Names:
  • Ritalin®
Experimental: Noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor
Participants in the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor group will be asked to take one pill containing 8 mg reboxetine 1.5 hours before performing the tasks.
8 mg Reboxetine (Edronax®) is administered once using a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design
Other Names:
  • Edronax®
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants in the placebo group will be asked to take a placebo pill 1.5 hours before performing the tasks.
A placebo pill is administered once using a randomized placebo-controlled between subject's design
Other Names:
  • Placebo Pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response time data
Time Frame: These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered

The investigators record responses and specifically reaction times during 5 different decision-making tasks.

In a value vs salience task, value and salience processing is disentangled during value-based decision-making. Participants either accept or reject compound stimuli that were before associated with monetary outcomes.

In a face in the crowd task, participants detect a target face (angry vs happy) in a crowd of opposite face type.

During a task on risk and ambiguity decision-making, participants have to decide between safe and lottery options associated with either monetary risk or ambiguity.

In an adaptive risk-taking task, participants have to choose between two risky monetary options.

In an effort task, participants decide whether they are willing to exert physical effort for monetary reward.

Response times are measured in milliseconds from the tasks. The investigators calculate how long participants take to make decisions in each trial.

These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Choice data
Time Frame: These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
As a dependent variable the investigators record responses and specifically choices made during the above-mentioned different decision-making tasks. The investigators evaluate what kind of answers were made during each trial of the decision-making tasks, in respect to correctness or preference (percentage).
These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Computational modelling applied to choice data
Time Frame: These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Computational parameters are mathematically estimated from the data of participants during the above-mentioned decision-making tasks. Specifically, mathematical models will be applied to choice data (percentage).
These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Computational modelling applied to response time data
Time Frame: These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered
Computational parameters are mathematically estimated from the data of participants during the above-mentioned decision-making tasks. Specifically, mathematical models will be applied to response time data (milliseconds).
These tasks take place 1,5 hours after the drug was administered

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philippe Tobler, PhD, University of Zuerich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 13, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Methylphenidate

3
Subscribe