Adults In The Making Prevention Trial (AIM)

July 6, 2022 updated by: Gene H. Brody, University of Georgia

Preventing Alcohol Use Among African American Youths

This study was a randomized prevention trial investigating the efficacy of the Adults in the Making (AIM) prevention program against a control condition. The primary outcome variable is alcohol use. The study sample were 367 African American seniors in high school and their primary caregivers. The AIM program is a 6 session (12 hour) family-centered intervention designed to deter alcohol use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study investigators designed a multicomponent prevention program to deter substance use among African American emerging adults in rural Georgia (SAAF-Emerging Adult Program, SAAF-EAP). The intervention's delivery is modeled after an existing prevention program designed by Dr. Brody called, The Strong African American Families (SAAF) program and included a series of separate weekly sessions for emerging adults, their parents, and extended family members, as well as sessions in which participants interact with one another to apply the skills learned in the separate sessions. The sample consisted of 690 families with a high school senior, half of whom will be assigned randomly to a prevention group and half of whom will be assigned to a control group. Pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up assessments of emerging adults' substance use were conducted with the entire sample. The study started when the participants were high school seniors, and followed them and their families as the youths enter emerging adulthood. The conceptual model that guided the program incorporated the following predictors: (1) autonomy-promoting parenting and responsive family relationships, characterized by developmentally appropriate instrumental and emotional support, expectations and discussions about emerging adults' roles and responsibilities, affectively positive relationships that feature open communication, and adaptive racial socialization that includes strategies for dealing with discrimination; (2) contextual stressors, including racial discrimination, poverty, and limitations in educational and occupational opportunities; (3) negative emotions and the avoidant coping responses they elicit; (4) emerging adults' future orientation, self-regulation, emotion regulation, racial identity, and sense of adult status; (5) affiliations with substance-using friends and romantic partners; and (6) cognitive antecedents of substance use, including prototypes of substance-using agemates and willingness to use substances in risk-conducive situations. To examine these constructs, the investigators implemented a multi-informant design that included assessments from emerging adults, their friends and romantic partners, their primary caregivers, and their extended family members.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

367

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 17 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Residence in county where sampling was targeted
  • Youth self identified as African American or Black

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete survey measures or participate in intervention due to mental health concerns

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AIM preventive intervention
Families were assigned to receive a 6 session, 12 hour prevention program in their community.
The AIM prevention program, modeled after an existing family-based skills-training intervention in a group format for rural African American preadolescents, consists of six consecutive weekly group meetings held at community facilities, with separate parent and youth skill-building curricula and a family curriculum. Each of the six meetings includes separate, concurrent training sessions for parents and youth, followed by a joint parent-youth session during which the families practice the skills they learned in their separate sessions. Concurrent and family sessions each last 1 hour. Thus, both parents and youth receive 12 hours of prevention training.
Other Names:
  • AIM
No Intervention: Control
Families were assigned to no intervention control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol use
Time Frame: follow up at 27 months post baseline
Past month frequency of alcohol use, item from Monitoring the Future Survey
follow up at 27 months post baseline
Conduct problems
Time Frame: follow up at 27 months post baseline
Parent reported rule breaking and aggression sub-scales of the Child Behavior Checklist. The combined subscales yield a score ranging from 0-38 with higher scores indicating more conduct problems
follow up at 27 months post baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: follow up at 27 months post baseline
parent reported depressed/anxious symptoms on a subscale of the Child Behavor Checklist that ranged from 0-24 with higher scores indicating more depressive or anxiety symptoms
follow up at 27 months post baseline
Protective caregiving
Time Frame: follow up at 6 months post baseline
parent reported scale assessed the extent to which the primary caregiver provided emotional support, was accessible to the youth, and discussed difficult issues with which the youth was dealing. The 15 item scale ranged from 15-60 with higher scores reflecting more protective caregiving.
follow up at 6 months post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gene Brody, PhD, University of Georgia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2005-10106

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Drinking

Clinical Trials on Adults in the Making program

3
Subscribe