Implementation of Supportive Sling Device in Adults Post-stroke for Prevention of Shoulder Complications (EO31)

November 6, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse
Upper limb (UL) impairment is a common deficit following stroke with only an estimated 20 per cent of patients recovering function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Upper limb (UL) impairment is a common deficit following stroke with only an estimated 20 per cent of patients recovering function. Pain associated with UL impairment due to multifactorial causes is a frequent symptom in patients with stroke. Occupational therapy techniques focus on the implementation of positioning techniques and the use of supportive devices (SD) such as slings aimed to prevent pain; therefore increase daily function, participation and hence quality of life. At present, positioning principles of the hemiplegic shoulder exist in clinical practice. These are aimed at prevention of pain associated with UL Impairment; however there is no clear consensus among professionals of particular SD that should be implemented for adults with stroke

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Evelyne Castel-Lacanal, MD

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31000
        • Recruiting
        • Chu de Toulouse
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Evelyne Castel-Lacanal, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having suffered in the last 6 months maximum a first stroke responsible for hemiplegia.
  • Finding a clinical 5mm appendix, or with shoulder pain requiring prescription a scarf.
  • Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) > 3.
  • Consent of the patient
  • Patient affiliated or benefiting from a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke recurrence, or stroke more than 6 months-old
  • Patient already wearing a coaptation scarf
  • Presence of lymphoedema, venous thrombosis of the upper limb
  • Neoprene allergy
  • Severe cognitive impairment: Mini-Mental State (MMS) <15
  • Patient being part of another care protocol
  • Adult under the protection of justice, tutors or curators
  • Pregnant or lactating woman.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the EO31 shoulder sling
To develop and evaluate the effects of the EO31 shoulder sling for the prevention of pain, subluxation, spasticity, as well as effect on increasing functional use of the UL in activities of daily living.
Investigator want to evaluate the efficient of the EO31 shoulder sling in adults post-stroke. The EO31 shoulder sling is made-to-measure shoulder pads for upper limb after cerebrovascular accident

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the effects of the EO31 shoulder with Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) scale
Time Frame: 5 weeks
GAS (Goal Attainment Scale) scores will be described with regards to the 3 client-centred objectives. The score for each objective is comprised between -2 (when objective is not achieve) to 2 (achieve objective).
5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate shoulder pain with Visual Analog Scale for Pain (EVA scale)
Time Frame: 24 hours
The shoulder pain will be evaluate with th sling with EVA Scale. Eva scale is between 0 (no pain) to 10 (big pain)
24 hours
Evaluate shoulder pain with EVA scale
Time Frame: 5 weeks
The shoulder pain will be evaluate with th sling with EVA Scale. Eva scale is between 0 (no pain) to 10 (big pain).
5 weeks
Evaluate shoulder pain with EVA scale
Time Frame: baseline
The shoulder pain will be evaluate with th sling with EVA Scale. Eva scale is between 0 (no pain) to 10 (big pain).
baseline
Spasticity with TARDIEU scale
Time Frame: baseline
Evaluate the spasticity of upper limb with TARDIEU scale: the rotation angle of the shoulder, elbow and wrist are measured
baseline
Spasticity with TARDIEU scale
Time Frame: 7 days
Evaluate the spasticity of upper limb with TARDIEU scale: the rotation angle of the shoulder, elbow and wrist are measured
7 days
Spasticity with TARDIEU scale
Time Frame: 14 days
Evaluate the spasticity of upper limb with TARDIEU scale: the rotation angle of the shoulder, elbow and wrist are measured
14 days
Spasticity with TARDIEU scale
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Evaluate the spasticity of upper limb with TARDIEU scale: the rotation angle of the shoulder, elbow and wrist are measured
5 weeks
Number of daily use of the upper limb sling
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Evaluate if patient use the sling : number of use by day
5 weeks
Clinical measure of appendage
Time Frame: baseline
Evaluate of appendage with clinical measure during all the treatment. This measure is in millimeter
baseline
Clinical measure of appendage
Time Frame: 7 days
Evaluate of appendage with clinical measure during all the treatment. This measure is in millimeter
7 days
Clinical measure of appendage
Time Frame: 14 days
Evaluate of appendage with clinical measure during all the treatment. This measure is in millimeter
14 days
Clinical measure of appendage
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Evaluate of appendage with clinical measure during all the treatment. This measure is in millimeter.
5 weeks
motor function of upper limb with Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) scale
Time Frame: baseline
the motor function of the upper limb will be evaluate with CAHAI scale between 13 (motor function low) to 94 (motor function strong)
baseline
motor function of upper limb with CAHAI scale
Time Frame: 7 days
the motor function of the upper limb will be evaluate with CAHAI scale between 13 (motor function low) to 94 (motor function strong)
7 days
motor function of upper limb with CAHAI scale
Time Frame: 5 weeks
the motor function of the upper limb will be evaluate with CAHAI scale between 13 (motor function low) to 94 (motor function strong)
5 weeks
questionnaire for quality of patient's life
Time Frame: baseline
the quality of patient's life will be evaluate with ESAT scale between 0 (quality of life low) and 60 (good quality of life)
baseline
questionnaire for quality of patient's life
Time Frame: 5 weeks
the quality of patient's life will be evaluate with ESAT scale between 0 (quality of life low) and 60 (good quality of life)
5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evelyne Castel-Lacanal, MD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebrovascular Accident

Clinical Trials on Evaluate the effects of the EO31 shoulder sling in adults post-stoke

3
Subscribe