- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04028999
Implementation of Supportive Sling Device in Adults Post-stroke for Prevention of Shoulder Complications (EO31)
November 6, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse
Upper limb (UL) impairment is a common deficit following stroke with only an estimated 20 per cent of patients recovering function.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Upper limb (UL) impairment is a common deficit following stroke with only an estimated 20 per cent of patients recovering function.
Pain associated with UL impairment due to multifactorial causes is a frequent symptom in patients with stroke.
Occupational therapy techniques focus on the implementation of positioning techniques and the use of supportive devices (SD) such as slings aimed to prevent pain; therefore increase daily function, participation and hence quality of life.
At present, positioning principles of the hemiplegic shoulder exist in clinical practice.
These are aimed at prevention of pain associated with UL Impairment; however there is no clear consensus among professionals of particular SD that should be implemented for adults with stroke
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
25
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Evelyne Castel-Lacanal, MD
- Phone Number: 33-5 61 32 21 20
- Email: castel-lacanal.e@chu-toulouse.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Evelyne Castel-Lacanal, MD
Study Locations
-
-
-
Toulouse, France, 31000
- Recruiting
- Chu de Toulouse
-
Contact:
- Magalie Martin
- Email: martin.m@chu-toulouse.fr
-
Principal Investigator:
- Evelyne Castel-Lacanal, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having suffered in the last 6 months maximum a first stroke responsible for hemiplegia.
- Finding a clinical 5mm appendix, or with shoulder pain requiring prescription a scarf.
- Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) > 3.
- Consent of the patient
- Patient affiliated or benefiting from a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
- Stroke recurrence, or stroke more than 6 months-old
- Patient already wearing a coaptation scarf
- Presence of lymphoedema, venous thrombosis of the upper limb
- Neoprene allergy
- Severe cognitive impairment: Mini-Mental State (MMS) <15
- Patient being part of another care protocol
- Adult under the protection of justice, tutors or curators
- Pregnant or lactating woman.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: the EO31 shoulder sling
To develop and evaluate the effects of the EO31 shoulder sling for the prevention of pain, subluxation, spasticity, as well as effect on increasing functional use of the UL in activities of daily living.
|
Investigator want to evaluate the efficient of the EO31 shoulder sling in adults post-stroke.
The EO31 shoulder sling is made-to-measure shoulder pads for upper limb after cerebrovascular accident
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluate the effects of the EO31 shoulder with Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) scale
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
GAS (Goal Attainment Scale) scores will be described with regards to the 3 client-centred objectives.
The score for each objective is comprised between -2 (when objective is not achieve) to 2 (achieve objective).
|
5 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluate shoulder pain with Visual Analog Scale for Pain (EVA scale)
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
The shoulder pain will be evaluate with th sling with EVA Scale.
Eva scale is between 0 (no pain) to 10 (big pain)
|
24 hours
|
Evaluate shoulder pain with EVA scale
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
The shoulder pain will be evaluate with th sling with EVA Scale.
Eva scale is between 0 (no pain) to 10 (big pain).
|
5 weeks
|
Evaluate shoulder pain with EVA scale
Time Frame: baseline
|
The shoulder pain will be evaluate with th sling with EVA Scale.
Eva scale is between 0 (no pain) to 10 (big pain).
|
baseline
|
Spasticity with TARDIEU scale
Time Frame: baseline
|
Evaluate the spasticity of upper limb with TARDIEU scale: the rotation angle of the shoulder, elbow and wrist are measured
|
baseline
|
Spasticity with TARDIEU scale
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Evaluate the spasticity of upper limb with TARDIEU scale: the rotation angle of the shoulder, elbow and wrist are measured
|
7 days
|
Spasticity with TARDIEU scale
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Evaluate the spasticity of upper limb with TARDIEU scale: the rotation angle of the shoulder, elbow and wrist are measured
|
14 days
|
Spasticity with TARDIEU scale
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
Evaluate the spasticity of upper limb with TARDIEU scale: the rotation angle of the shoulder, elbow and wrist are measured
|
5 weeks
|
Number of daily use of the upper limb sling
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
Evaluate if patient use the sling : number of use by day
|
5 weeks
|
Clinical measure of appendage
Time Frame: baseline
|
Evaluate of appendage with clinical measure during all the treatment.
This measure is in millimeter
|
baseline
|
Clinical measure of appendage
Time Frame: 7 days
|
Evaluate of appendage with clinical measure during all the treatment.
This measure is in millimeter
|
7 days
|
Clinical measure of appendage
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Evaluate of appendage with clinical measure during all the treatment.
This measure is in millimeter
|
14 days
|
Clinical measure of appendage
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
Evaluate of appendage with clinical measure during all the treatment.
This measure is in millimeter.
|
5 weeks
|
motor function of upper limb with Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) scale
Time Frame: baseline
|
the motor function of the upper limb will be evaluate with CAHAI scale between 13 (motor function low) to 94 (motor function strong)
|
baseline
|
motor function of upper limb with CAHAI scale
Time Frame: 7 days
|
the motor function of the upper limb will be evaluate with CAHAI scale between 13 (motor function low) to 94 (motor function strong)
|
7 days
|
motor function of upper limb with CAHAI scale
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
the motor function of the upper limb will be evaluate with CAHAI scale between 13 (motor function low) to 94 (motor function strong)
|
5 weeks
|
questionnaire for quality of patient's life
Time Frame: baseline
|
the quality of patient's life will be evaluate with ESAT scale between 0 (quality of life low) and 60 (good quality of life)
|
baseline
|
questionnaire for quality of patient's life
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
the quality of patient's life will be evaluate with ESAT scale between 0 (quality of life low) and 60 (good quality of life)
|
5 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Evelyne Castel-Lacanal, MD, University Hospital, Toulouse
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 3, 2019
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2021
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 22, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
July 23, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 9, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 6, 2020
Last Verified
November 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RC31/17/0460
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebrovascular Accident
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Heart and Stroke Foundation...CompletedStroke | Vascular Accident, Brain | Stroke, Acute | Cerebrovascular Accident | Cerebral Stroke | Cerebrovascular Stroke | Cerebrovascular Accident, Acute | Apoplexy | CVA | Cerebrovascular ApoplexyCanada
-
Sheba Medical CenterCompletedLate Effects of Cerebrovascular Accident
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompletedTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation | Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)Belgium
-
Sunnyview Rehabilitation HospitalRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Acute | Cerebrovascular Accident | Cerebrovascular Accident, AcuteUnited States
-
Peking University Third HospitalAstraZeneca Investment (China) Co., LtdCompletedCerebrovascular Accident | Cerebrovascular Accident, AcuteChina
-
Medical University of South CarolinaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCompletedIschemic Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States
-
John DavidsonWashington University School of MedicineWithdrawnIschemic Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States
-
University of California, IrvineEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)United States
-
Parker Hannifin CorporationCedars-Sinai Medical Center; Kessler Foundation; TIRR Memorial Hermann; Shirley... and other collaboratorsCompletedStroke | Hemiplegia | Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)United States
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingCerebrovascular Accident (CVA)France
Clinical Trials on Evaluate the effects of the EO31 shoulder sling in adults post-stoke
-
Firat UniversityCompletedChild, Only | Chronic Diseases in ChildrenTurkey
-
University of DerbyRecruitingOld Age; Debility | Stability | Balance; DistortedUnited Kingdom
-
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit UniversityCompletedPostoperative Delirium | Preoperative AnxietyTurkey
-
University of DerbyCompletedAcute Effects of Elastic Band Resistance on Postural Stability and Physical Function in Older AdultsOld Age; Debility | Stability | Balance | PosturographyUnited Kingdom
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaCompletedInflammatory Bowel Diseases | Hepatitis C Virus InfectionSpain
-
Nantes University HospitalCompletedDental Care for ChildrenFrance
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterTerminatedRotator Cuff TearsUnited States
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedQuality of Life | Physical Disability | Psychosocial Problem | Meniere DiseaseTurkey
-
George Washington UniversityGlaxoSmithKlineTerminated
-
Sohag UniversityCompletedAnalgesia in Patients With Open Inguinal Hernia SurgeriesEgypt