Adaptive SCS for Treatment of Gait Disturbance in PD

September 2, 2020 updated by: Bomin Sun, Ruijin Hospital

Sensor-Driven Position-Adaptive Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Gait Disturbance in Parkinson's Disease

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been suggested by several research for treating PD gait disturbance. However, the side effects induced by body position change cannot fully addressed by conventional SCS. Medtronic sensor-driven position-adaptive SCS are capable to monitor the position change and change the parameters accordingly, so as to reduce the position change related side effects. Nevertheless, neither the efficacy nor safety of this technique in the treatment of gait disturbance in PD is ever investigated. Therefore, the investigators will conduct a randomized clinical trial to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of sensor-driven position-adaptive SCS in the treatment of gait disturbance in PD. This study will contribute to find out the safety and efficacy of sensor-driven position-adaptive SCS in the treatment of PD gait disorder, improve patients' quality of life, and reduce the burden on family and society.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a randomized double-blind crossover design aiming to test the short-term efficacy and safety of sensor-driven position-adaptive SCS in the treatment of gait disturbance in patients with PD. More than 1 month after operation, subjects will be randomly assigned into two groups, with one group treated with conventional spinal cord stimulation intervention and the other treated with sensor-driven position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation intervention. Both groups will be followed-up for more than 1 week and receive comprehensive evaluation. A cross-over design will then be applied to eliminate the individual variability until both groups complete another 1 week follow-up. Stimulation parameters and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) remained during follow-up in both group. Clinical evaluation is assessed by 6-min walk test (6MWT) and timed up-and-go task (TUG) with gait analysis. Quality of life is evaluated by The 5-level EQ-5D. The severity of PIGD is assessed by gait and fall questionnaire (GFQ) , modified fall efficacy scale(MFES), activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale and the survey of activities and fear of falling in the elderly (SAFFE ). Within group t test will be made for comparison between two groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Dianyou Li, doctor
  • Phone Number: +8613817864569 +8613817864569
  • Email: ldy11483@rjh.com.cn

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200025
        • Recruiting
        • Functional neurosurgery of Shanghai Jiaotong University affiliated Ruijin Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1,Parkinsonism(including idiopathic Parkinson's disease,Vascular Parkinson's disease, Atypical parkinsonism).
  • 2, Aged 45-75 years old, Hoehn & Yahr stage (medication off condition) at 2~4;
  • 3, Patients willingly seek surgical treatment for PD gait disturbance;
  • 4, Walking disorder with freezing episodes, insufficiently alleviated by oral dopaminergic therapy and/or physiotherapy;
  • 5, SCS eligibility has been confirmed by neurologist and neurosurgeon;
  • 6, Ability to perform a gait/walking task (under close supervision);
  • 7, Informed consent and have good compliance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1, Lesion in spinal cord or other surgical contraindications;
  • 2, Other neuropsychiatric disorders or relevant medical history; haven't achieved the optimal therapeutic effects of DBS surgery or drug therapy;
  • 3, Medical history of stroke, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or myasthenia gravis; taking prohibited medications (such as lithium, valproate, steroids, adrenergic agonists, etc.);
  • 4, Cardiac, renal or other important organs hypofunction or dysfunction, or unstable vital signs;
  • 5, Women reporting that they are pregnant;
  • 6, Any situation (medical, psychological, social, geographical, etc.) that may endanger patient's life or result in patients withdrawing from the study at present or in the future.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: conventional SCS
Conventional SCS can not change the parameter when the body position changes.
EXPERIMENTAL: sensor-driven position-adaptive SCS
Medtronic sensor-driven position-adaptive SCS is capable to monitor the position change and change the parameters accordingly, so as to reduce the position change related side effects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-min walk test during the first week (6MWT-1W)
Time Frame: 1 week follow-up
The 6-min walk test is a test walking over a span of 6 minutes. Gait characters are recorded for further analysis.
1 week follow-up
timed up-and-go task during the first week (TUG-1W)
Time Frame: 1 week follow-up
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a performance-based measure of functional mobility that was initially developed to identify mobility and balance impairments in older adults. Gait characters are recorded for further analysis.
1 week follow-up
6-min walk test during the second week (6MWT-2W)
Time Frame: 2 week follow-up
The 6-min walk test is a test walking over a span of 6 minutes. Gait characters are recorded for further analysis.
2 week follow-up
timed up-and-go task during the second week (TUG-2W)
Time Frame: 2 week follow-up
The 6-min walk test is a test walking over a span of 6 minutes. Gait characters are recorded for further analysis.
2 week follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level Health Scale(EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 1 and 2 week follow-up
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-assessed, health related, quality of life questionnaire. The scale is a composite of a short descriptive system questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive systemmeasures quality of life on a 5-component scale including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each state is referred to by a 5-digit code, and the five subscores of the test can be combined to give a summary index value of 0-1, with lower scores representing poorer overall QoLState. The second task component includes a visual analogue scale (VAS) used for rating 'current health state' with a range of 0(worst imaginable health)-100(best imaginable health).
1 and 2 week follow-up
Gait and Fall Questionnaire(GFQ)
Time Frame: 1 and 2 week follow-up
The FOGQ assesses Freezing of Gait (FOG) severity unrelated to falls in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD), FOG frequency, disturbances in gait, and relationship to clinical features conceptually associated with gait and motor aspects (e.g., turning).GFQ score has a range of 0 (no gait problems) to 64 (severe gait problems)
1 and 2 week follow-up
Modified Fall Efficacy Scale(MFES)
Time Frame: 1 and 2 week follow-up
The modified Gait Efficacy Scale (mGES) is a 10-item self-report measure used to assess walking confidence under challenging everyday circumstances.The mFES scale is a visual analog scale in which items are scored from 0 to 10, with 0 meaning "not confident/not sure at all," 5 being "fairly confident/fairly sure," and 10 being "completely confident/completely sure." Total the ratings (possible range = 0 - 140) and divide by 14 to get each subject's mFES score. Scores of < 8 indicate fear of falling, 8 or greater indicate lack of fear.
1 and 2 week follow-up
Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale
Time Frame: 1 and 2 week follow-up
he ABC Scale is a self-report measure of balance confidence in performing various activities without losing balance or experiencing a sense of unsteadiness.Items are rated on a 0% to 100% whole number rating scale. Scores of zero represent no confidence; scores of 100 indicate complete confidence. Overall score is calculated by adding item scores and then dividing by the total number of items. Cut-off score of < 69% is predictive of recurrent falls.
1 and 2 week follow-up
Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (SAFFE )
Time Frame: 1 and 2 week follow-up
The Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (SAFE) was developed to assess these difficulties, and its utility has been demonstrated among the older adults and older people with Parkinson's disease.mSAFFE score has a range of 17-51. Higher scores indicate more fear of failling.
1 and 2 week follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on conventional SCS

3
Subscribe