Different Levels of Guidance in iCBT for Depression (RCT)

September 15, 2020 updated by: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

iCBT for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Levels of Guidance

The study examines the effectiveness of a internet-based self-help-program called Selfapy for individuals who are experiencing mental stress. The main objective of the study is to investigate the extent to which Selfapy leads to a significant reduction in depressive symptoms. As this study is the first to evaluate the program Selfapy, also quality of life and acceptance of the program are evaluated. The study is conducted as a randomized-controlled trial with parallel assignment into three conditions. The groups were organized into one wait-list control group and two groups receiving access to Selfapy with different levels of guidance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study examines the effectiveness of a internet-based self-help-program called Selfapy for individuals who are experiencing mental stress. The main objective of the study is to investigate the extent to which Selfapy leads to a significant reduction in depressive symptoms. As this study is the first to evaluate the program Selfapy, also quality of life and acceptance of the program are evaluated. The primary outcome is the PHQ-9 as a measure of the severity of depressive symptoms, combined with the BDI-II. Secondary outcomes are rates of quality of life and satisfaction with the program, which were measured with the WHOQOL-BREF and ZUF-8. The study is conducted as a randomized-controlled trial with parallel assignment into three conditions over the course of three months. The groups were organized into one wait-list control group, one that received Selfapy with additional peer support and one that received Selfapy with therapeutic guidance.The wait-list control group received access to the program after completion of the post-survey.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjective psychological distress caused by depressive symptoms, wish for treatment, access to Internet, sufficient knowledge of the German language.

Exclusion Criteria:

Acute suicidal tendencies, lifetime diagnoses of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, presence of neurological or dementia disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Online self-help program with additional peer support
The intervention group receives the login data for the online program directly following the baseline assessment. The program consists of 9 modules with many interactional exercises. Themes that are addressed in the online-program are for example self-esteem, coping with relapse, establishing a structure for daily life and attention and breathing exercises as well as depression-specific topics such as negative thoughts management and arranging and maintaining social contacts. In addition, participants were able to participate in exchange with peers via an internal closed forum.
The program consists of 9 modules with many interactional exercises. Themes that are addressed in the online-program are for example self-esteem, coping with relapse, establishing a structure for daily life and attention and breathing exercises as well as depression-specific topics such as negative thoughts management and arranging and maintaining social contacts. In addition, participants were able to participate in exchange with peers via an internal closed forum.
No Intervention: No intervention: waitlist-control group
The participants of the wait-list control condition do not receive any new intervention during the intervention period of 9 weeks, but may continue any treatment that has already been started before, including medication. Participants in the wait-list control condition receive full access to the program after completion of the post-assessment.
Experimental: Online self-help program with therapeutic guidance
The intervention group receives the login data for the online program directly following the baseline assessment. The program consists of 9 modules with many interactional exercises. Themes that are addressed in the online-program are for example self-esteem, coping with relapse, establishing a structure for daily life and attention and breathing exercises as well as depression-specific topics such as negative thoughts management and arranging and maintaining social contacts. In addition, participants were able to talk about personal experiences and difficulties concerning the program on a weekly basis with a therapeutic guide on the phone.
The program consists of 9 modules with many interactional exercises. Themes that are addressed in the online-program are for example self-esteem, coping with relapse, establishing a structure for daily life and attention and breathing exercises as well as depression-specific topics such as negative thoughts management and arranging and maintaining social contacts. In addition, participants were able to talk about personal experiences with a therapeutic guide.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in depression measured with Patient Health Questionnaire 9 - Depression module (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Assesses symptoms over the last two weeks; provided at baseline and post (after 3 months); change from baseline to post is being measured
The PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al. 2001) is made up of 9 items which could be self-rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Major depression and other depression diagnoses according to DSM-IV can be determined according to the overall score. Sum scores of 0-4 indicate none or minimal depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depressive symptoms, 10-14 moderate depressive symptoms, and 15-27 severe depressive symptoms. Its internal consistency ranges from 0.86-0.89 (Smarr and Keefer 2011).
Assesses symptoms over the last two weeks; provided at baseline and post (after 3 months); change from baseline to post is being measured
Change in depression measured with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
Time Frame: Assesses symptoms over the last two weeks; provided at baseline and post (after 3 months); change from baseline to post is being measured
The BDI-II (Beck et al., 1996) is a 21-item self-report inventory measuring the severity of depression in adolescents and adults. Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (symptom not present) to 3 (symptom very intense). The BDI assesses psychological and physical symptoms over the last two weeks in order to quantify levels of depression. An overall score of 0-13 indicates minimal depression, a score of 14-19 indicates mild depression, a score of 20-28 moderate depression and total scores of 29-63 suggest severe depression. The internal consistency of the BDI-II ranges from 0.79-0.90 (Smarr and Keefer 2011).
Assesses symptoms over the last two weeks; provided at baseline and post (after 3 months); change from baseline to post is being measured

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life measured with World Health Organization Quality Of Life - abbreviated version (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: Assesses symptoms over the last two weeks; provided at baseline and post (after 3 months); change from baseline to post is being measured
The WHOQOL-BREF is a shorter version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-100 (The WHOQOL Group 1998). It is composed of 26 self-report items measuring domains such as physical health, psychological health, social relationships and environment with the aim of measuring changes in quality of life over the course of treatment. Four different types of 5-point Likert scales are applied, asking "how much", "how complete", "how often", "how good" or "how satisfied" the person felt concerning the past two weeks. The WHOQOL-BREF has an internal consistency of .70 (Skevington, Lotfy, & O'Connell, 2004).
Assesses symptoms over the last two weeks; provided at baseline and post (after 3 months); change from baseline to post is being measured
Questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction (Fragebogen zur Patientenzufriedenheit, ZUF-8)
Time Frame: Assesses patient satisfaction with the program at the time of assessment; provided only at post (3 months after baseline)
The German version of the Questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction (Fragebogen zur Patientenzufriedenheit, ZUF-8; Schmidt, Lamprecht, & Wittmann, 1989) is a self-report inventory that measures client satisfaction concerning the received treatment during inpatient stays. Each item could be answered on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 4 (totally agree). The internal consistency of the ZUF-8 ranges between 0.87-0.93 (Brähler, Schumacher, & Strauß, 2002).
Assesses patient satisfaction with the program at the time of assessment; provided only at post (3 months after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steffen Moritz, Prof., University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Selfapy

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Selfapy with additional peer support

3
Subscribe