Trial of Befizal® 200 mg for the Treatment of Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (Béfinohl)

September 21, 2023 updated by: Christophe Orssaud, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades

Study of Efficacy of Befizal® 200 mg for the Treatment of Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy

Study of the efficiency of Béfizal® 200 mg in 14 adult patients with a LHON that occurred for less than 5 years. Patient must have certain specific mutations

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study of the efficiency of Béfizal® 200 mg in 14 adult patients in whom the diagnosis of LHON obtained on anamnestic, clinical and ancillary testing / laboratory data. LHON should have occurred for less than 5 years and must be genetically proved with a 3460 or 11778 mitochondrial DNA mutation. Given the mode of transmission, genetic research may have been carried out in a maternal relative

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75015
        • HEGP Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients in whom the diagnosis of LHON obtained on anamnestic, clinical and ancillary testing / laboratory data. LHON should have occurred for less than 5 years and must be genetically proved with a 3460 or 11778 mitochondrial DNA mutation. Given the mode of transmission, genetic research may have been carried out in a maternal relative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • * Any optic neuropathy for which the diagnosis of LHON is not formally confirmed or genetically proven;

    • LHON that started for more than 5 years;
    • LHON associated with another primary mutation than 3460 or 11778
    • Children or adult patients under guardianship or deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision;
    • Women of childbearing age ; pregnant or lactating women;
    • Patients who do not have affiliation to a social protection scheme (national or private insurance / beneficiary or assignee);
    • Patient who did not give its written, informed and signed consent;
    • Allergy to fibrate, bezafibrate and / or BEFIZAL® 200mg (Arrow Generiques) or one of these constituents;
    • Photosensitivity reactions related to fibrates;
    • Patient already receiving treatment with fibrates or HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors or anticoagulants;
    • Hepatic insuffisiency or dysfunction with increased of transaminases (AST and ALT) over 3 times of the normal;
    • Renal insufficiency with serum creatinine> 15 mg / L (> 135 mg / dL) Biliary pathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: treatment group

14 adult patients in whom the diagnosis of LHON obtained on anamnestic, clinical and ancillary testing / laboratory data. LHON should have occurred for less than 5 years and must be genetically proved with a 3460 or 11778 mitochondrial DNA mutation. Given the mode of transmission, genetic research may have been carried out in a maternal relative.

Befizal® 200 mg will be tested for one year

600 mf befizal a day for one year

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of best corrected farsight visual acuity (in LogMAR)
Time Frame: Month12
Measurement of the best corrected farsight visual acuity by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study type scale (range from -0.3 to 2.6) -0.3 is the best vision and 2.6 the worse
Month12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Farsight best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 3
Measurement of the Farsight best corrected visual acuity in LogMAR by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study type scale (range from -0.3 to 2.6) -0.3 is the best vision and 2.6 the worse
Month 3
Evolution of Farsight best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 6
Measurement of the Farsight best corrected visual acuity in LogMAR by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study type scale (range from -0.3 to 2.6) -0.3 is the best vision and 2.6 the worse
Month 6
Evolution of Farsight best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 9
Measurement of the Farsight best corrected visual acuity in LogMAR by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study type scale (range from -0.3 to 2.6) -0.3 is the best vision and 2.6 the worse
Month 9
Evolution of Farsight best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 15
Measurement of the Farsight best corrected visual acuity in LogMAR by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study type scale (range from -0.3 to 2.6) -0.3 is the best vision and 2.6 the worse
Month 15
Evolution of Farsight best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 3
Measurement of the Farsight best corrected visual acuity by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study type scale (range from -0.3 to 2.6) -0.3 is the best vision and 2.6 the worse
Month 3
Evolution of Farsight decimal best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 6
Measurement of the Farsight best corrected visual acuity (in LogMAR) measured with a Monoyer scale (range from 20/20 to light perception). 20/20 is the best vision and light perception the worse
Month 6
Evolution of Farsight decimal best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 9
Measurement of the Farsight best corrected visual acuity (in LogMAR) measured with a Monoyer scale (range from 20/20 to light perception). 20/20 is the best vision and light perception the worse
Month 9
Evolution of Farsight decimal best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 12
Measurement of the Farsight best corrected visual acuity (in LogMAR) measured with a Monoyer scale (range from 20/20 to light perception). 20/20 is the best vision and light perception the worse
Month 12
Evolution of Farsight decimal best corrected visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 15
Measurement of the Farsight best corrected visual acuity (in LogMAR) measured with a Monoyer scale (range from 20/20 to light perception). 20/20 is the best vision and light perception the worse
Month 15
Evolution of Nearsight visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 3
Measurement of the best corrected nearsight visual acuity measured using a Parinaud scale (from P48 to P1>.5) P48 is the worse vision and P1.5 the best
Month 3
Evolution of Nearsight visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 6
Measurement of the best corrected nearsight visual acuity measured using a Parinaud scale (from P48 to P1>.5) P48 is the worse vision and P1.5 the best
Month 6
Evolution of Nearsight visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 9
Measurement of the best corrected nearsight visual acuity measured using a Parinaud scale (from P48 to P1>.5)P48 is the worse vision and P1.5 the best
Month 9
Evolution of Nearsight visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 12
Measurement of the best corrected nearsight visual acuity measured using a Parinaud scale (from P48 to P1>.5) P48 is the worse vision and P1.5 the best
Month 12
Evolution of Nearsight visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 15
Measurement of the best corrected nearsight visual acuity measured using a Parinaud scale (from P48 to P1>.5) P48 is the worse vision and P1.5 the best
Month 15
Evolution of retinal nerve fibers layer Optical Coherent Tomography
Time Frame: Month 6
physiological parameter : Optical Coherent Tomography
Month 6
Evolution of retinal nerve fibers layer Optical Coherent Tomography
Time Frame: Month 12
physiological parameter : Optical Coherent Tomography
Month 12
automated visual field measurement
Time Frame: Month 3
physiological parameter : automated visual field corrected deviation of a visual field, measured according to a protocol STAT protocol 30 (Champ visuel Métrovision, Perenchies, France)
Month 3
automated visual field measurement
Time Frame: Month 6
physiological parameter : automated visual field
Month 6
automated visual field
Time Frame: Month 9 of a treatment with BEFIZAL® 200mg (ARROW GENERIQUES) compare to Month 0
physiological parameter : automated visual field corrected deviation of a visual field, measured according to a protocol STAT protocol 30 (Champ visuel Métrovision, Perenchies, France)
Month 9 of a treatment with BEFIZAL® 200mg (ARROW GENERIQUES) compare to Month 0
automated visual field measurement
Time Frame: Month 12
physiological parameter : automated visual field corrected deviation of a visual field, measured according to a protocol STAT protocol 30 (Champ visuel Métrovision, Perenchies, France)
Month 12
automated visual field measurement
Time Frame: Month 15
physiological parameter : automated visual field corrected deviation of a visual field, measured according to a protocol STAT protocol 30 (Champ visuel Métrovision, Perenchies, France)
Month 15
Manual visual field measurement
Time Frame: Month 3
physiological parameter : manual visual field measured with isopters V / 4, III / 1 and II / 1
Month 3
Manual visual field measurement
Time Frame: Month 6
physiological parameter : manual visual field measured with isopters V / 4, III / 1 and II / 1
Month 6
Manual visual field measurement
Time Frame: Month 9
physiological parameter : manual visual field measured with isopters V / 4, III / 1 and II / 1
Month 9
Manual visual field measurement
Time Frame: Month 12
physiological parameter : manual visual field measured with isopters V / 4, III / 1 and II / 1
Month 12
Manual visual field measurement
Time Frame: Month 15
physiological parameter : manual visual field measured with isopters V / 4, III / 1 and II / 1
Month 15
National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25
Time Frame: Month 12
Questionnaire
Month 12
Concentration of serum creatinine
Time Frame: Every three months until Month 15
Concentration of serum creatinine
Every three months until Month 15
Concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time Frame: Every three months until Month 15
Blood test
Every three months until Month 15
Concentration of very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Time Frame: Every three months until Month 15
Blood test
Every three months until Month 15
Concentration of triglycerides
Time Frame: Every three months until Month 15
Blood test
Every three months until Month 15
Rate of Partial thromboplastin time
Time Frame: Every three months until Month 15
Blood test
Every three months until Month 15
Concentration of Aspartate aminotransférase
Time Frame: Every three months until Month 15
Blood test
Every three months until Month 15
Concentration of Alanine aminotransférase
Time Frame: Every three months until Month 15
Blood test
Every three months until Month 15
Concentration of lactate deshydrogenase
Time Frame: Every three months until Month 15
Blood test
Every three months until Month 15
Concentration of creatine kinase
Time Frame: Every three months until Month 15
Blood test
Every three months until Month 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Dominique Bremond Gignac, MD PhD, Necker Hopsital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Safety Issues

3
Subscribe