Access to Kidney Transplantation in Minority Populations (AKT-MP)

May 19, 2026 updated by: Larissa Myaskovsky, PhD, University of New Mexico

Access to Kidney Transplantation in Minority Populations (AKT-MP)

Hispanic/Latino (HL) and American Indian (AI) patients are more likely than whites to have kidney failure, but less likely to complete transplant evaluation or receive a kidney transplant (KT), the best treatment for kidney failure. Using comparative effectiveness research methods, we will conduct a pragmatic randomized trial to compare the efficacy and cost- effectiveness of two approaches to help HL and AI patients overcome barriers to completing transplant evaluation and receiving a KT: a streamlined KT evaluation process and a peer-assisted evaluation program; and, we will determine best practices to assist other transplant centers in implementing the better program. Findings from this work may help reduce disparities in transplant evaluation and KT.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The AKT-MP study will assess whether Kidney Transplant Fast Track (KTFT), a streamlined KT evaluation process, or peer navigators (PN) who were former KT patients to help patients "navigate" their way through KT evaluation, can help vulnerable patients with kidney failure overcome barriers to transplant listing. After culturally and contextually adapting the two interventions, we will use a comparative effectiveness (CER) approach to conduct a pragmatic randomized trial of 398 kidney failure patients to compare the efficacy and effectiveness of the two approaches in disadvantaged groups at a university-affiliated transplant center with large HL and AI kidney failure patient populations, and we will compare results to historic comparison populations (local and national). We will assess facilitators and barriers to widespread implementation and conduct a cost effectiveness analysis. Although it is expected that KTFT will be more effective than PN, KTFT may also be more costly, requiring significant administrative and clinical changes in the transplant center, which may be impractical to maintain. Further, KTFT may lead to more patient ambivalence because the shortened evaluation period will give them less time to consider their treatment options. Thus, an important aspect of the proposed study is to comparative the effectiveness of the two methods. Ultimately, our study will inform transplant programs faced with disparities in KT about which disparity-reducing intervention to use given their particular needs and resources.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

376

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87131
        • University of New Mexico

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing kidney transplant evaluation at the University of New Mexico
  • Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • Mentally competent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children less than 18 years of age are excluded because all research-related measurements are designed for patients over the age of 18. Children less than 18 years of age have dissimilar decision-making authority as a result of their developmental stage and dependency on adult guardians who must make all their transplant-related decisions, as required by all pediatric transplant centers. The proposed study focuses only on adult transplant patients.
  • Waitlisted at another transplant center
  • Prior kidney transplant
  • Incarcerated patients
  • Pregnant women
  • Active systemic infection
  • Non-skin malignancy or melanoma in the past 2 years
  • Known cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
KTFT
Streamlined KT evaluation involving completion of most or all testing on the same day a patient arrives for their first pre-transplant clinic appointment. Or, a transplant clinic scheduler secures testing within a 4 week period.
Experimental: Arm 2
PN
Uses trained, previous KT recipients who meet weekly to monthly with patient participants to provide tailored information and assistance in completing the necessary steps to proceed to transplant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of KT evaluation completion
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Completion of evaluation for KT and placement on the transplant waiting list.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
KT ambivalence
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
KT ambivalence will be assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale, with questions rating from strongly agree to strongly disagree.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patient Reported Quality of Life
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
We will use the PROMIS Scale v1.2 Global Health measure to assess quality of life (QOL), which includes items relevant to patients with kidney disease, including overall health, physical limitations, work, pain, energy, and emotional problems.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Larissa Myaskovsky, PhD, University of New Mexico

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Diseases

Clinical Trials on Kidney Transplant Fast Track (KTFT)

Subscribe