Evaluation of a "Fast Track" Respiratory Therapy Clinic for Patients With Suspected Severe Sleep-Disordered Breathing

July 10, 2025 updated by: Sachin R. Pendharkar, University of Calgary

Access to medical care for patients with breathing disorders during sleep is a major problem for Canadians. Recently, there has been increasing interest in how health care providers who are not physicians can help to improve access to medical care for these patients, but it is unclear whether patients with severe sleep-disordered breathing who receive care from these non-physician providers have the same response to treatment as patients who receive care from physicians. Since these severe have a high risk of developing cardiac and respiratory complications and of being hospitalized, an initiative to improve access such as the use of non-physician providers could be of great benefit to individual patients and the health care system.

The objectives of this project are:

  1. to determine whether patients with severe breathing disorders during sleep have the same response to treatment when cared for by non-physician health care providers (respiratory therapists) as they do when cared for by physicians;
  2. to determine the effects of non-physician health care provider treatment to patient access;
  3. to determine health care utilization and related costs associated with non-physician health care provider treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The difficulty in providing timely access to sleep specialists is widespread. These delays are particularly important for patients with severe sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) due to the increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes and potential associated healthcare costs. The lack of timely access has sparked an interest in the use of alternate care providers (ACPs) to manage patients with SDB. Our group and others have demonstrated that ACPs are an effective and efficient substitute for physicians for patients with uncomplicated SDB. However, the role of ACPs in the management of patients with severe SDB remains unclear.

Prompted by wait times that far exceed current Canadian guidelines, we have recently implemented an ACP-led "Fast Track" clinic for patients who are referred to the Foothills Medical Centre (FMC) Sleep Centre with suspected severe SDB. In this clinic, patients with suspected severe SDB are assessed by a sleep-trained registered respiratory therapist functioning as an ACP. Decisions regarding further sleep testing and treatment are made by the patient and ACP, under the guidance of a sleep physician. This model of care differs from a physician-led model that is used at the FMC Sleep Centre.

To evaluate this novel care delivery model, we have designed a randomized trial comparing outcomes for patients in the "Fast Track" clinic to those who undergo conventional, physician-led care. The specific goals of this study are:

  1. to compare the clinical effectiveness of an ACP-led clinic for patients with suspected severe SDB to physician-led management;
  2. to determine whether cycle times from referral to diagnosis and treatment for patients referred with suspected severe SDB can be reduced by an ACP-led clinic;
  3. to determine the impact of an ACP-led clinic on the demand for sleep physicians, ACPs and diagnostic testing;
  4. to compare the cost-effectiveness of these models of care using data on healthcare utilization, costs, and patient reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Patients in the "Standard Management" arm will be assessed by a sleep respirologist and follow a management plan that is determined by the sleep physician and patient. This plan may involve polysomnography or the initiation of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. If further testing is ordered, follow-up may occur with the physician or with an ACP, at the physician's discretion. For patients initiating PAP therapy, the decision to delegate follow-up to an ACP will be left up to the physician, as the intent of this study is to observe real-world practice and not to change the management of individual patients.

In the "Fast Track" arm, an ACP will perform the initial assessment and will determine the management plan with the patient. To ensure patient safety, the management plan will be discussed with a sleep respirologist, who will be designated as the patient's primary sleep physician. This sleep physician will be available at the FMC Sleep Centre during the "Fast Track" clinic to assist with the assessment of patients who appear unwell (e.g. severe hypoxemia, decompensated cardiorespiratory failure, etc.). As in the "Standard Management" arm, follow-up visits to review test results, discuss and initiate treatment, or to assess treatment response may occur with the ACP who performed the initial assessment or may be delegated to any other ACP.

As is usual procedure at the FMC Sleep Centre, ambulatory sleep test requisitions will be completed by ACPs or physicians, whereas all polysomnogram requisitions will be completed by the primary sleep physician to ensure adequate blinding of patient assignment. The research associate will ensure that all tests are interpreted in advance of clinic visits. Patients who are followed by ACPs in either arm can be referred to the primary sleep physician for assessment of non-respiratory sleep disorders, or for persistent symptoms such as daytime sleepiness.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Foothills Medical Centre Sleep Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • referred to the FMC Sleep Centre for assessment of SDB
  • meet one of the three criteria for suspected severe SDB:

    1. Respiratory disturbance index (RDI) >/= 30 events/hour on an ambulatory sleep test
    2. Mean nocturnal oxygen saturation </= 85% on an ambulatory sleep test
    3. Suspected hypoventilation, defined by an RDI >/= 15 events/hour on an ambulatory sleep test and partial pressure of carbon dioxide >/= 45 mmHg on arterial blood gas
    4. On supplemental oxygen therapy with high suspicion of SDB (as determined by physician review of referral)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected concomitant sleep disorder other than SDB
  • A previous diagnosis of OSA treated with PAP or dental appliance
  • Primary health insurance provided by a province other than Alberta
  • Failure to provide consent to participate in the study
  • Under the age of 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard Management
Patients in the "Standard Management" arm will be assessed without any interventions.Patients will be assessed by a sleep respirologist and follow a management plan that is determined by the sleep physician and patient. This plan may involve polysomnography or the initiation of PAP therapy. If further testing is ordered, follow-up may occur with the physician or with an ACP, at the physician's discretion. For patients initiating PAP therapy, the decision to delegate follow-up to an ACP will be left up to the physician, as the intent of this study is to observe real-world practice and not to change the management of individual patients.
Active Comparator: Fast Track
In the "Fast Track" arm, an ACP will perform the initial assessment and will determine the management plan with the patient.
In the "Fast Track" arm, an ACP will perform the initial assessment and will determine the management plan with the patient. To ensure patient safety, the management plan will be discussed with a sleep respirologist, who will be designated as the patient's primary sleep physician. This sleep physician will be available at the FMC Sleep Centre during the "Fast Track" clinic to assist with the assessment of patients who appear unwell. As in the "Standard Management" arm, follow-up visits to review test results, discuss and initiate treatment, or to assess treatment response may occur with the ACP who performed the initial assessment or may be delegated to any other ACP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Therapy
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment initiation
Data includes number of hours used per night on all nights
3 months after treatment initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Daytime Sleepiness
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment initiation

Epworth Sleepiness Scale - this is a subjective scale measuring tendency for an individual to fall asleep in 8 different circumstances. Score is 0-3 for each circumstance but is reported as a total score.

Minimum total score = 0, Maximum total score = 24 Higher scores mean worse outcome

3 months after treatment initiation
Health Care Utilization
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
Costs for physician visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations
1 year after treatment initiation
Total Healthcare Costs
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
Comparing costs for each arm (used to calculate the incremental cost effectiveness ratio)
1 year after treatment initiation
Time From Date of Referral to Date of Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: Expected within 1 year (unknown due to nature of outcome)
Comparing cycle times for intervention vs. control arm
Expected within 1 year (unknown due to nature of outcome)
Change in Daytime Sleepiness
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
Epworth Sleepiness Scale - a subjective scale measuring tendency for an individual to fall asleep in 8 different circumstances. Total score is sum of score in each circumstance (0-3) Minimum total score = 0, Maximum total score = 24 Higher scores mean worse outcome
1 year after treatment initiation
Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Therapy
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
Data includes number of hours used per night.
1 year after treatment initiation
Change in Disease Specific Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment initiation
Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index - subjective disease-specific quality of life scale, incorporating 4 domains measured pre/post intervention (scored 1-7 on a Likert scale) and 3 post-intervention domains that are weighted before incorporated in the final score Minimum = 1 Maximum = 7 Higher scores indicate a better outcome
3 months after treatment initiation
Change in Disease Specific Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index - subjective disease-specific quality of life scale, incorporating 4 domains measured pre/post intervention (scored 1-7 on a Likert scale) and 3 post-intervention domains that are weighted before incorporated in the final score Minimum = 1 Maximum = 7 Higher scores indicate a better outcome
1 year after treatment initiation
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment initiation
Visit-Specific Instrument (VSQ-9) - comprises 9 questions for which patients assign a Likert scale score from 0-5. Score is reported as sum of Likert scale score for each question 0 to 45 scale Higher scores mean a better outcome.
3 months after treatment initiation
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
Visit-Specific Instrument (VSQ-9) - comprises 9 questions for which patients assign a Likert scale score from 0-5. Score is reported as sum of Likert scale score for each question 0 to 45 scale Higher scores mean a better outcome.
1 year after treatment initiation
Number of Sleep Diagnostic Tests and Sleep Ambulatory Care Visits
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
Reported as costs for home sleep apnea tests, polysomnograms, new and follow-up clinical visits
1 year after treatment initiation
Change in Severity of Sleep-disordered Breathing
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months after treatment initiation
Respiratory event index from ambulatory testing - reported values represent change from baseline to 3 months
baseline and 3 months after treatment initiation
Change in Severity of Sleep-disordered Breathing
Time Frame: baseline and 1 year after treatment initiation
Respiratory event index from ambulatory testing - reported values represent change from baseline to 3 months
baseline and 1 year after treatment initiation
Change in General Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 3 months after treatment initiation
Health Utilities Index - a 17-question general health related quality of life index. Total score indicates subjective assessment of HRQOL from close to death to perfect health Maximum = 1 Minimum = 0 Higher score means a better outcome
3 months after treatment initiation
Change in General Health-related Quality of Life
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
Health Utilities Index - a 17-question general health related quality of life index. Total score indicates subjective assessment of HRQOL from close to death to perfect health Maximum = 1 Minimum = 0 Higher score means a better outcome
1 year after treatment initiation
Quality Adjusted Life Years
Time Frame: 1 year after treatment initiation
Comparing quality adjusted life years for each arm (used to calculate the incremental cost effectiveness ratio). Quality adjusted life years were estimated using a utility score ranging from 0 (death) to 1.0 (perfect health) derived from the HUI3 questionnaire, combined with the total length of follow-up time for each patient at baseline 12 months
1 year after treatment initiation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sachin R Pendharkar, MD, MSc, University of Calgary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

July 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Disordered Breathing

Clinical Trials on Fast Track

Subscribe