Evaluation of Survivorship Wellness Group Program for Patients Treated at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)

June 12, 2024 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Evaluation of the Survivorship Wellness Group Program: An Interdisciplinary Goal-Setting Clinical Group Program for Survivors of Cancer at UCSF

Interdisciplinary psychological interventions targeting survivorship are not only understudied but face several implementation challenges. For this project, the study team is proposing to analyze these data to report on preliminary pilot outcomes, as well as acceptability and feasibility of the implementation of the Survivorship Wellness Group Program, an interdisciplinary wellness and health-behavior change program for survivors of cancer, who have completed treatment at University of California, San Francisco and are currently without evidence of active disease.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

STUDY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To examine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing an interdisciplinary goal-setting clinical group program focused on domains of physical, psychological, and spiritual wellness for survivors of cancer at University of California, San Francisco.
  2. To determine preliminary efficacy of the Survivorship Wellness intervention in regards to:

    1. Increasing knowledge of and perceived confidence in execution of health behavior changes in domains of physical, emotional, and spiritual wellness for survivors of cancer
    2. Increasing quality of life
    3. Reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety
    4. Increasing physical activity

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Survivors of cancer who have been treated at University of California, San Francisco

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-speaking
  • Treated for any kind of cancer at University of California, San Francisco, though finished with active treatments (defined as chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery) at time of enrollment, and without evidence of current active cancer
  • Sufficient cognitive ability to participate in group activities as determined by their attending medical oncologist or surgeon

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking
  • Primary cancer treatment outside of UCSF
  • Currently receiving non-maintenance therapies (chemotherapy or radiation) for active cancer
  • Psychiatric illness that would affect the ability to participate in a group activity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Survivorship Wellness Group
Participants will be enrolled in a 15 week program to assess quality of life and general health outcomes
Participants will be asked to complete a series of questionnaires assessing quality of life and other general health outcomes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form Depression scores over time
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The PROMIS Depression Short form consists of 4 items addressing patient depression with item response scores ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (Always). Raw scores are converted to scaled T-scores with higher scores indicating a greater level of depression.
Up to 16 weeks
Changes in the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Short Form scores over time
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The PROMIS Anxiety Short form consists of 2 items addressing patient anxiety with item response scores ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (Always). Raw scores are converted to scaled T-scores with higher scores indicating a greater level of anxiety.
Up to 16 weeks
Changes in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale (FACT-G) scores over time
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The FACT-G is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of health related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients with 4 domains of interest: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each tem response score ranges from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much). The total score is a sum of the subscale scores, with a range from 0 - 108. The higher the score, the better the HRQOL.
Up to 16 weeks
Frequency of participant responses to Program Satisfaction survey item
Time Frame: Week 16
Program satisfaction is measured by the participant's response to the following item: "How satisfied were you, overall, with this program?". Responses ranged from Not at all satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Mostly satisfied, and Extremely satisfied. Responses will be counted and reported by category.
Week 16
Changes in the frequency of participant responses cancer survivorship wellness survey: Importance
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The 16 item cancer survivorship wellness survey assesses each participant for their level of importance in learning about various wellness topics of cancer survivorship and their current knowledge of these topics. Each item addressing importance is rated by the participant in terms of how important it is to learn about topics specific to cancer survivorship. Items are rated according to 5 categories "Not at all important", "Somewhat important", "Moderately important", "Very important", and "Extremely important".
Up to 16 weeks
Changes in the frequency of participant responses cancer survivorship wellness survey- Knowledge
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The 16 item cancer survivorship wellness survey assesses each participant for their level of importance in learning about various wellness topics of cancer survivorship and their current knowledge of these topics. Each item addressing knowledge is rated by the participant in terms of how knowledgeable the participants are regarding topics specific to cancer survivorship. Items are rated according to 5 categories "Not at all knowledgeable", "Somewhat knowledgeable", "Moderately knowledgeable", "Very knowledgeable", and "Extremely knowledgeable".
Up to 16 weeks
Changes in the frequency of participant responses to exercise frequency survey item
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The frequency of current exercise for participants was measured by a single item "How frequently do you exercise currently"? Responses are comprised of 5 categories: "Every day", "Several times per week", "Once per week", "Less than once per week", "Several times per month", "Once per month", and "Less than once per month"
Up to 16 weeks
Changes in the frequency of participant responses to exercise intensity survey item
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The intensity of current exercise for participants was measured by a single item "How would you rate the intensity of your current exercise regimen?". Responses are comprised of 5 categories: "Very low intensity", "Light intensity", "Moderate intensity", and "High intensity".
Up to 16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Margaret Chesney, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20802

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Questionnaires

Subscribe