Are You in a Poor Country; HIPEC is Still in Reach

December 4, 2020 updated by: Mohamed I Abdelhamid, Zagazig University

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a well-known sequel of multiple abdominal malignancies either arising from the gastro-intestinal tract or of gynaecologic origin. On occurrence, PC is mostly considered as a very bad prognostic sign hence it affects the overall survival with very poor response to systemic chemotherapy.

On introduction of the new concept of combined optimal cytoreduction (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), promising prognosis began to be shown.

A major obstacle which may face application of HIPEC manoeuvre is the cost either of the machine or the disposable kit used in handling the chemotherapy, heating it and delivering it to the patient, hence we established our machine design with its disposable kits making it available for use in poor places.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

As aforementioned the use of HIPEC technique offered a promising results in dealing with peritoneal carcinomatosis the high costs seems to be a considerable obstacle in some poor places so we inented a machine with considerably lower costs both in the machine composition and its disposable kit used for every patient we used it for six years in a trial to find any shortage, obstacles or any technical, therapeutic or financial drawbacks compared to the published data of the standard machines

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any patient candidate for HIPEC procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to HIPEC procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: patients with Peritoneal carcinomatosis
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a well-known sequel of multiple abdominal malignancies either arising from the gastro-intestinal tract or of gynaecologic origin. On occurrence, PC is mostly considered as a very bad prognostic sign hence it affects the overall survival with very poor response to systemic chemotherapy.
To report the affordability on using the HIPEC machine of our design compared to the standard ones in poor places.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Thermal efficiency of the machine
Time Frame: 6 years of the study using the machine
The ability of the machine to warm the chemoperfusate to 43 c for 90 minutes (the duration of peritoneal perfusion)
6 years of the study using the machine
Electrical efficiency of the machine
Time Frame: 6 years of the study using the machine
Reporting any interruption or unexplained stop of the thermostat resulting in stopping of chemoperfusate flow to and out of the abdomen during the 90 minutes of the maneuver
6 years of the study using the machine
The manufacturing costs in US dollar
Time Frame: one weak at the start of the trial
the costs paid by the owner of manufacturing the machine throughout collecting its components and technical fitting them into a machine
one weak at the start of the trial
The disposable costs in US dollar
Time Frame: 6 years of the study using the machine
the costs spent by the patient at each use paid for the disposable parts of the machine of the chemotherapy perfusion circuit to and from the patient
6 years of the study using the machine

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects on the patient following HIPEC
Time Frame: 4 weeks
following the patient in the postoperative period searching for adverse effects of HIPEC resulting from either the chemotherapy used or the physical activity of the machine
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HIPEC is still in reach 2020

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIPEC

Clinical Trials on HIPEC device

Subscribe