Comparison of Stretching and MET in Lower Cross Syndrome

December 9, 2020 updated by: Riphah International University

Comparing the Effects of Stretching and Muscle Energy Technique in the Management of Lower Cross Syndrome

The aim of the study is to compare the effects of stretching exercises & muscle energy techniques in the management of lower cross syndrome and to find the effective treatment in the lower cross syndrome management.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In 2015 the systematic review estimated that prevalence of Chronic low back pain in 24 to 39 year old individual was 4.2% and the individual between 20 to 59 was 19.6% . The genesis and perpetuation of Low back pain (LBP) has many underlying factors among which one is proposed by Janda's concept of pelvic crossed syndrome. This condition describes a pattern of tight and weak muscles around the pelvis. Marked postural deviation is seen such as increased lumber lordosis and depending on this lordosis the muscle involvement can be distinguished. The center of the gravity is slightly anterior to S1 or S2, which means pelvis position, is key to faulty or good alignment.

Various studies have been done on muscle imbalance Lower crossed syndrome (LCS) using Stretching and Muscle energy Technique (MET). Both have shown superior effects when compared to other treatment modalities/techniques. However there is paucity of literature on effectiveness of stretching and MET in management of LCS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • KPK
      • Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, 25000
        • Bibi Zahida Memorial Teaching Hospital NCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • LCS pattern in standing position
  • Patients having Chronic low back pain
  • Age : 20-50 years
  • Both male and females
  • Positive Prone Hip Extension movement pattern test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fracture (wedge compression #)
  • Inflammatory disorder
  • Acute disc bulge
  • Lumber instability
  • Idiopathic scoliosis
  • Patient with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other systemic diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Muscle energy technique
Muscle energy technique applied in the lower cross syndrome muscle pattern.
Muscle energy technique for illiopsoas, rectus femoris, erector spinae & hamstrings muscles duration of contraction was 10 sec, rest interval was 5 sec, stretch duration was 30 sec, number of repetition of stretch was 5, number of set was 1, frequency per week was 3
Active Comparator: Stretching
Stretching technique applied in the lower cross syndrome muscle pattern.
Stretching exercises for illiopsoas, rectus femoris, erector spinae & hamstrings muscles duration of stretch was 15 sec, rest interval was 5 sec, number of repetition was 5, number of set was 1, frequency per week was 3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric pain rating scale
Time Frame: 4th week
It was calculated through Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) in which 0 was the lowest value with no pain label and 10 was the highest value with worst possible pain label. The Subjects with respect to their pain intensity were asked to mark a level of NPRS.
4th week
ROM assessment of iliopsoas
Time Frame: 4th week
Range of motion (ROM) was taken via goniometer for iliopsoas was measured with double inclinometer.
4th week
ROM assessment of rectus femoris
Time Frame: 4th week
Range of motion (ROM) was taken via goniometer for rectus femoris was measured with double inclinometer.
4th week
ROM assessment of hamstrings
Time Frame: 4th week
Range of motion (ROM) was taken via goniometer for hamstrings was measured with double inclinometer.
4th week
ROM assessment of erector spinae
Time Frame: 4th week
Range of motion (ROM) was taken via goniometer for erector spinae was measured with double inclinometer.
4th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/00383 Nouman Khan

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cross Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Muscle energy technique

3
Subscribe