Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major Depressive Disorder Patients (ADAM)

February 17, 2021 updated by: University of Malaya
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major Depressive Disorder is feasible and effective in involving patients in the decision-making process when initiating pharmacotherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To examine the ability of the patient decision aid to enhance shared decision making and preparedness to make decisions pertaining to antidepressant therapy. The research team has systematically developed an Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major depressive disorder patients (ADAM) according to the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. This is a posttest-only study with nonequivalent groups to evaluate the effect of the antidepressant decision aid on patient and physician perception of shared decision making as well as patient preparedness for making pharmacotherapeutic decisions compared usual care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

752

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • University of Malaya Medical Centre
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • Hospital Pusrawi
      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • Klinik Pakar Dr Yeoh & Dr Hazli Mental Health Specialist
      • Putrajaya, Malaysia
        • Hospital Putrajaya
    • Johor
      • Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
        • Hospital Permai
      • Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
        • Sultanah Aminah Hospital
      • Nusajaya, Johor, Malaysia
        • Columbia Asia Hospital
    • Kuala Lumpur
      • Ampang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • KPJ Ampang Puteri Specialist Hospital
      • Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • Dr Seed Specialist Clinic
      • Serdang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
        • Hospital Pengajar Universiti Putra Malaysia
    • Pahang
      • Temerloh, Pahang, Malaysia
        • Hospital Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah
    • Perak
      • Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
        • Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
    • Pulau Pinang
      • George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
        • Hospital Pulau Pinang
    • Sarawak
      • Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
        • Hospital Umum Sarawak
    • Selangor
      • Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
        • A. H. Lee Specialist Clinic
    • Terengganu
      • Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
        • Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
  • No psychotic symptoms
  • Based on psychiatrist's clinical judgement currently in need for antidepressant treatment.
  • Functional English literacy and language skills (to use the decision aid and fill out the questionnaires)
  • Provides consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychosis
  • Communication barriers (visual impairment, language barrier)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Arm
The "Booklet of Scripts for Doctors" was used in the control arm. This tool was developed and tested to encourage shared decision-making in prescribing antidepressants within the Malaysian context.
Active Comparator: Intervention Arm
The "Booklet of Scripts for Doctors" along with the "Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major depressive disorder patients, ADAM", was used in the intervention arm. The decision aid was developed as per the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) criteria to enhance patient understanding of risks and benefits of different antidepressants available within the Malaysian context.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shared Decision Making_Patient Perspective
Time Frame: Immediately after the clinical encounter
The patient version of the Shared Decision Making scale (SDM-Q-9) measures the extent to which patients are involved in the decision-making process from the patient's perspective. It consists of nine items rated on a six-point Likert-type scale from"completely disagree=" to"completely agree=". Adding the score of all the items leads to a raw total between 0 and 45. Multiplying the raw score by 20/9 provides a transformed score ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate a greater extent of SDM.
Immediately after the clinical encounter
Shared Decision Making_Physician Perspective
Time Frame: Immediately after the clinical encounter
The physician version of Shared Decision Making scale (SDM-Q-Doc) measures the extent to which patients are involved in the decision-making process from the physician's perspective. It consists of nine items rated on a six-point Likert-type scale from"completely disagree=" to"completely agree=". Adding the score of all the items leads to a raw total between 0 and 45. Multiplying the raw score by 20/9 provided a transformed score ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate a greater extent of SDM.
Immediately after the clinical encounter
Preparation for Decision Making_Patient Perspective
Time Frame: Immediately after the clinical encounter
The patient version of the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PDMS) assesses the patient's perception of how the PDA helped them recognize that a decision needs to be made, preparing them to communicate with their practitioner and promote patient involvement in the decision-making process. Higher scores indicate a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
Immediately after the clinical encounter
Preparation for Decision Making_Physician Perspective
Time Frame: Immediately after the clinical encounter
The physician version of the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PDMS) assesses the physician's perception of how the PDA helped patients recognize that a decision needs to be made, preparing them to communicate with their practitioner and promote patient involvement in the decision-making process. Higher scores indicate a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
Immediately after the clinical encounter

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aya Ahmed Abousheishaa, University of Malaya
  • Principal Investigator: Ng Chong Guan, University of Malaya

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Booklet of Scripts of Doctors

Subscribe