AMAZE™ Asthma Implementation QI Study

July 28, 2022 updated by: AstraZeneca

AMAZE™ Asthma Implementation Quality Improvement Study

The primary study objective is to generate evidence as to the feasibility, usability, perceived value, and potential benefits of implementing the AMAZE™ platform into clinical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

AstraZeneca has developed the AMAZE™ disease management platform to be used across multiple disease indications to provide a unified experience for the management of patients throughout their patient care journey. AMAZE™ integrates multiple systems, including a patient mobile application where patients can enter daily symptoms and impact to communicate this information to their healthcare provider, as well as access disease educational materials. Implementation of AMAZE™ within clinical practice has not yet been evaluated. The results from this study will be used to inform any changes or modifications that need to be made to the technology platform, its implementation process, and explore impact on clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

117

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78730
        • Research Site
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78746
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be recruited from the GAA network, with approximately 120 patients ≥18 years old with a current diagnosis of asthma being enrolled. Participants will need to have access to a smartphone with internet.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 years of age at the time of enrollment
  • Clinically confirmed diagnosis of asthma
  • Access to a smartphone with internet access with the following requirements: iOS (Operating System iOS 13 or newer and Devices iPhone 8 or newer) or Android (Operating System 8.0 or newer)
  • Able to understand and speak English sufficiently to be able to use the AMAZE™ patient App
  • Willingness to participate in a telephone interview and be audio-recorded
  • Consenting to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis of active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or any pulmonary diagnosis other than asthma;
  • Has a cognitive impairment, hearing difficulty, acute psychopathology, medical condition, or insufficient knowledge of the English language that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with his or her ability to agree to participate and/or complete the ACT™

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Quality Initiative
Each participant will be asked to complete the symptoms log daily for up to 6 months. Additional surveys will be completed throughout the study by participants and GAA clinical staff.
The disease management platform includes a patient mobile application where patients can enter daily symptoms, communicate with their healthcare providers, and access educational materials. Additionally, the healthcare providers will have access to a dashboard that is integrated with the EMR and patient app.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient App Usage
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Patient app usage will be measured as the number of days the patient engages (i.e., completes daily log, sends a message) with the app at least once a day during the study period.
Up to 6 months
Clinician Dashboard Usage
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Clinician dashboard usage will be measured as the mean number of days per week/month that the clinical site staff accessed the AMAZE™ dashboard over the 6-month period.
Up to 6 months
Daily Asthma status
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Patient daily asthma status (bad, okay, good) reported on the app will be described weekly during Month 1, and then per month from Month 1 through Month 6 pending availability of data after Month 1.
Up to 6 months
Symptoms and Triggers
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Frequency of symptoms and frequency of triggers (for those that reported symptoms) reported on the app will be described weekly during Months 1, and then per month from Month 1 through Month 6 pending availability of data after Month 1.
Up to 6 months
Self-Reported Rescue Medication usage
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The number of times per month a patient used rescue medication as well as visited the emergency room or urgent care as reported on the app will be described from Month 1 through Month 6.
Up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of AMAZE™ on patient visits
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The impact of AMAZE™ on patient visits will be measured as the frequency of patients who select "agree" or "strongly agree" in response to the 9-items in the patient visit experience survey.
Up to 6 months
ER visits and Hospitalization avoidance
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The impact of AMAZE™ on ER and hospitalizations will be measured as the frequency of patients who report "agree" or "strongly agree" with the item "The visit helped avoid an ER or Urgent Care center visit or hospitalization" from the patient visit experience survey
Up to 6 months
Patient Perception of Appointment Discussions and Taking Part in Asthma Decisions
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The impact of AMAZE™ on improved patient communication with their provider will be measured as the frequency of patients who report "agree" or "strongly agree" with the items "the app helped me discuss my asthma with my healthcare provider(s) during my most recent visit" and "I was included in making decisions about my asthma treatment during my most recent visit" on the patient visit experience survey.
Up to 6 months
Patient Perception of Usability and Design of Mobile app
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The usability of the AMAZE™ app will be measured by the frequency of patients who rate the app excellent (SUS score >80.3), good (68-80.3), okay (68), poor (51-68), or awful (<51) at months 1 and 6
Up to 6 months
Clinical Staff Perception of Usability and Design of Dashboard
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The usability of the AMAZE™ dashboard will be measured by the frequency of clinical staff who rate the app excellent (SUS score >80.3), good (68-80.3), okay (68), poor (51-68), or awful (<51) at months 1 and 6
Up to 6 months
Evaluate ease of implementation of AMAZE™ in clinical setting
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The ease of implementation of AMAZE™ will be measured by the frequency of clinical staff who report "very easy" or "somewhat easy" to the question "How would you rate the overall ease of implementing AMAZE™ on a platform into your clinical practice?" in the post-study survey at month 6.
Up to 6 months
Evaluate impact of AMAZE™ on managing patients
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The impact of AMAZE™ on managing patients will be measured by the frequency of clinical staff who report "moderately" or "very well" to the question "Did the AMAZE™ help you manage your patients?" in the post-study survey at month 6.
Up to 6 months
Evaluate Perceived Benefit of AMAZE™ in clinical setting
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The perceived benefit of AMAZE™ will be evaluated by the frequency of clinical staff who endorse different perceived benefits based on the item "what did you find the most useful about the AMAZE™ platform?" in the post-study survey at month 6.
Up to 6 months
Evaluate Perceived Disadvantages of AMAZE™ in clinical setting
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The perceived disadvantages of AMAZE™ will be evaluated by the frequency of clinical staff who endorse different perceived disadvantages based on the item "what did you find the least useful or cumbersome about the AMAZE™ platform?" in the post-study survey at month 6.
Up to 6 months
Evaluate patient satisfaction with healthcare experience
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Patient satisfaction with their healthcare experience will be evaluated using the PSQ-18 items and subscale scores (General Satisfaction, Technical Quality, Interpersonal Manner, Communication, Financial Aspects, Time Spent with Doctor, Accessibility and Convenience) at Month 6.
Up to 6 months
Evaluate patient satisfaction with app
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Satisfaction with the app features will be measured by the frequency of patients who report satisfaction on a scale of 1 (lowest satisfaction) to 5 (highest satisfaction) at months 1, 3, and 6.
Up to 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluating change in medication
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Medication changes from baseline to six-month will be evaluated.
Up to 6 months
Evaluating clinician-reported asthma control
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Asthma control was assessed by a clinician completed single item; asthma control at baseline will be evaluated.
Up to 6 months
Evaluating patient-reported asthma control
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
The impact of AMAZE™ on asthma control will be measured as the frequency of patients considered to be poorly controlled (ACT scores ≤15), not well-controlled (ACT scores 16-19, and well-controlled (ACT scores ≥20) from Month 1 through Month 6.
Up to 6 months
Changes in asthma symptoms before clinical visit
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Frequency of symptoms reported in the patient daily log up to a week proceeding a clinical visit during the study period will be evaluated to assess trends in symptoms that may have triggered a visit.
Up to 6 months
Changes in medication after clinical visit
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Following a clinical visit any time during the study period, medication changes will be monitored to determine if any changes were prompted by the visit.
Up to 6 months
Characteristics of Patients Most Likely to Benefit from AMAZE™
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Demographic information reported by the patient and clinical information reported by the clinical staff will be used and stratified by subgroups, including age, asthma severity, education, and ethnicity, to evaluate characteristics of patients most likely to benefit from AMAZE™
Up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Schultz, DO, MPH, GAA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please rerefer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the deidentified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool . Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on AMAZE™ Disease Management Platform

Subscribe