- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04904107
Improving the Accuracy of Referrals of Patients With Chest Pain (URGENT2)
A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve the accUracy of Referrals to the emerGency departmEnt of patieNts With chesT Pain by Using the Modified HEART Score in Emergency Medical Transport (URGENT 2.0)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should be referred to the hospital promptly. However, referring all patients with chest pain is not feasible, as recent studies showed that up to 80% of the patients with acute chest pain do not have ACS.
Bedside point-of-care (POC) high sensitive troponin testing (in fingerprick blood/capillary blood) and the modified HEART score have become available and might play a substantial role in the triage and diagnosis of chest pain patients in a pre-hospital setting by general practitioners (GPs) and EMT personnel in the future. We hypothesize that patients with chest pain can be referred more accurately by using the modified HEART score.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Lisa Frenk, Drs.
- Phone Number: 0031773205555
- Email: lfrenk@viecuri.nl
Study Locations
-
-
Limburg
-
Roermond, Limburg, Netherlands, 6043 CV
- Recruiting
- Laurentius Hospital Roermond
-
Contact:
- Cees de Vos, Dr.
-
Venlo, Limburg, Netherlands, 5912 BL
- Recruiting
- Viecuri Medical Centre Northern Limburg
-
Contact:
- Braim Rahel, Dr.
-
Contact:
- Joan Meeder, dr.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Chest pain or other complaints suspect of ACS for at least 2 hours where the GP or emergency medical personnel are in need of further diagnostics or risk stratification to come to a decision of referral.
- Patients, who have been informed of the nature of the study, agree to its provisions and have provided written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation/High suspicion of STE-ACS.
- Suspicion of an acute non-coronary diagnosis e.g. pulmonary embolism, thoracic aortic dissection or other life-threatening disease.
- Patients presenting cardiogenic shock, defined as: systolic blood pressure <90mmHg and heart rate >100 and peripheral oxygen saturation <90% (without oxygen administration)
- Patients presenting with sudden onset heart rhythm disorders and second or third degree atrioventricular block.
- Patients with confirmed ACS, PCI or CABG <30 days prior to inclusion.
- Impaired consciousness defined as an EMV <8.
- Severe shortness of breath.
- Patients with known end-stage renal disease (dialysis and/or MDRD < 30 ml/min).
- Patients with known cognitive impairment.
- Communication issues with patient/language barrier.
- Patients already participating in an interventional cardiology or cardiovascular trial.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
Chest pain patients in the intervention group will be assessed by EMT personnel by performing the modified HEART score (including POC high sensitive troponin-I measurement (POC HS cTnI)) and the referral policy depends on the result.
|
The modified HEART score was developed in 2007 and has been validated to stratify the risk of short-term adverse cardiac events in patients with chest pain at the ED. Negative predictive value (NPV) of the modified HEART score for ACS as well as positive predictive value (PPV) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6 weeks after presentation is high. The modified HEART score is an acronym for history, ECG, age, risk factors and troponin at arrival.The components can be rated 0,1 or 2 points each and result in a total score between 0 and 10. |
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Chest pain patients in the control group will receive standard triage and standard care according to the local (EMT) protocol.
|
Standard care and triage of chest pain patients according to the local (EMT)protocol.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The incidence of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) patients admitted at the cardiac ED (percentage, %)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Evaluation of the percentage of NCCP patients admitted to the cardiac ED by performing the modified HEART score in comparison to our control group (regular triage and care).
We aim to detect a reduction of minimal 10% in unnecessarily referred chest pain patients (NCCP patients) but expect an even higher percentage.
A lower percentage of NCCP patients indicates improval of the triage of chest pain patients.
|
30 days
|
|
The incidence of MACE (percentage, %)
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
The mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) i.e. acute myocardial infarction, non-elective percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or all cause death within 30 days, 6 months and 1 year after initial presentation in the intervention group versus control group. We aim that the proportion of MACE in the intervention group (modified HEART score) is non-inferior to the control group (regular care and triage). Preliminary results of the second phase of FAMOUS Triage trial showed 15.7% (13.1-18.6) MACE rate.We used the expected incidence of 15.7% as the point estimate (meaning no difference between control and intervention). A higher MACE rate (%) in the intervention group suggests a worst outcome. |
30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The incidence of MACE in subgroups (percentage, %)
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
Prespecified subgroup analyses of primary outcomes will be performed for:
|
30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
|
The incidence of non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) patients admitted at the cardiac ED in subgroups (percentage, %)
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
Prespecified subgroup analyses of primary outcomes will be performed for:
|
30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
|
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
This economic evaluation investigates the health care costs of full implementation of a prehospital rule- out strategy with the modified HEART score (intervention group) compared with regular care and standard transfer to the hospital to rule out ACS (control group).
Health-care costs will be prospectively recorded at baseline and at 30 days follow-up, 6 months and 1 year.
This includes health care costs due to readmission, diagnostic testing, revascularization etc.
The cost of hospital treatment is determined by the Dutch Diagnose Behandel Combinatie (DBC) hospital reimbursement system and the DBC information system, similar to the international diagnosis related group system.
|
30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
|
Assessment of the diagnostic value of the modified HEART score.
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
Positive Predictive Value (PPV), sensitivity, specificity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of the modified HEART score for ACS will be calculated.
|
30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
|
Overview of the actual diagnosis of patients with a low modified HEART score (0-3).
Time Frame: 30 days
|
To evaluate the percentage of patients in this specific group with ACS versus no-ACS.
|
30 days
|
|
Overview of the actual diagnosis of patients with moderate-high modified HEART score (>3).
Time Frame: 30 days
|
To evaluate the percentage of patients in this specific group with ACS versus no-ACS.
|
30 days
|
|
Clinical accuracy POC hs cTnI.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Clinical accuracy (Positive Predictive value) of POC hs cTnI assessment versus hs cTnT at the cardiac ED.
|
30 days
|
|
Time analysis.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Time elapsed from arrival EMT at patient's home to arrival at ED in intervention group versus control group.
|
30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Braim Rahel, Dr., Viecuri Medical Centre Northern Limburg
- Principal Investigator: Joan Meeder, Dr., Viecuri Medical Centre Northern Limburg
- Principal Investigator: Cees de Vos, Dr., Laurentius Hospital Roermond
- Study Director: Robert Willemsen, Dr., General practitioner office Nazareth Maastricht
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Study number 2021_002
- NL71820.096.19 (Other Identifier: Toetsingonline/CCMO)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction
-
Beijing Northland Biotech. Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) | Acute Myocardial Infarction of Anterior Wall | Acute Myocardial Infarction With ST Elevation | Acute Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation | Acute Myocardial Infarction of Left VentricleChina
-
Azienda ULSS 5 PolesanaUniversity of PadovaUnknownMyocardial Infarction, Acute | ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (nSTEMI)Italy
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaCompletedCardiac Arrest | Postresuscitation Syndrome | Myocardial Infarction (ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)Slovenia
-
Fundacio Privada Mon Clinic BarcelonaMiracor Medical SAWithdrawn
-
Samsung Medical CenterThe Korean Society of CardiologyNot yet recruiting
-
Stiftung Institut fuer HerzinfarktforschungGlaxoSmithKline; University Hospital Muenster; Klinikum NürnbergCompletedMyocardial Infarction | ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarctionGermany
-
Harbin Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingNon-stenting Treatment Strategy for Acute Myocardial Infarction With Non-severe Stenosis(EROSION IV)Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) | ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction(STEMI) | Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction(NSTEMI)China
-
Bispebjerg HospitalOdense University Hospital; Zealand University Hospital; Aarhus University Hospital and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingST Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Acute Myocardial Infarction | Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (nSTEMI)Denmark
-
Population Health Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedST Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Non ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionUnited States, Spain, Netherlands, Canada, Australia, Serbia, Egypt, Switzerland, Hungary, United Kingdom, France, Czechia, Nepal, North Macedonia
-
Chonnam National University HospitalNot yet recruitingMyocardial Infarction (MI) | AF - Atrial Fibrillation | NSTEMI - Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction | ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction(STEMI)South Korea