- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04942938
Impact of Direct Current Electrical Stimulation on Spasticity Levels and Functional Muscle Use in MS
A Pilot Study of Neubie, a Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Device, to Inhibit Lower Extremity Spasticity Levels and Normalize Muscle Functional Use During Transfers and Ambulation in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Approximately 66%6 to 84% of individuals with multiple sclerosis experience various levels of debilitating spasticity limiting freedom of movement at ankles, knees and hips causing deficits in ambulation, weakness from disuse of muscles not accessible due to spasticity. Per the North American Research Committee on Multiple Sclerosis, a survey was conducted on spasticity prevalence and results show 84% have some degree of spasticity from mild to incapacitating. Spasticity pathophysiology is complex and not completely understood with higher levels of incapacitating spasticity reported in this survey by those who were male, disabled and unemployed, indicating that psychosocial and subjective variables are significant. The pathophysiology currently best understood demonstrates an imbalance between inhibitory dorsal reticulospinal tract (RST) fibers and excitatory bulbopontine tegmentum. RST neurons receive direct somatic, vestibular, tectal, cerebellar and motor excitatory input and are scattered in the ventral and lateral spinal cord columns intermingled with propriospinal fibers. The peripheral Golgi tendon organ of muscle tendon and muscle spindle intrafusal fibers ubiquitous throughout the musculoskeletal system have direct monosynaptic connection to these central nervous system propriospinal fibers and heavily influence the degree of spasticity and overactive stretch reflexes.
Those who deal with all levels of spasticity use compensatory movement strategies causing altered arthrokinematics and have loss of strength, balance and efficient muscle use with postural changes. Spasticity management has been studied and treated from a pharmaceutical standpoint with some improvements but often side effects including fatigue, muscle weakness and cognition limit dosing in oral Baclofen, Dantrolene Sodium, Tizanidine and Benzodiazepines. Marijuana especially in form of cannabinoids shows mixed evidence for spasticity improvement and is a growing area of interest. There is a growing CBD interest in the MS population due to known reduction of CNS neurodegeneration in animal MS studies and no significant negative side effects with possible mild to moderate improvement in spasticity levels. Therapy interventions offered include frequent stretching especially of muscles that cross two joints including lumbricals, hamstrings, gastrocnemius and iliopsoas; light stroking over lower limbs demonstrated a 30% decrease in H-reflex amplitude lasting even 30 minutes after treatment; muscle cooling was shown to reduce muscle stretch activity and clonus; Armutlu et al. Reported significant reduction in plantar flexor spasticity in 10 patients with MS using high-frequency (100Hz) TENS for 20min daily for 4 weeks. Reduction noted on Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), electrophysiologic measurements and the AI; and serial casting performed over a 9-day period with cast changes every 3 days demonstrated reduced spasticity levels.
The NeuFit company offers a Neubie EMS product with a direct current using high fidelity audio equipment to decrease intensity of the treatment noxious stimulus and protect skin integrity from burns or intolerable pain. This system uses an exponential wave pattern to mimic the natural pattern neurologically to lengthen fibers of the sarcomere and engage force velocity of muscle with minimized protective co-contraction of nearby muscle groups9. The golgi tendon and muscle spindles code for joint position and muscle/tendon stretch with 66% of fibers being intrafusal. Impacting these structures has direct impact on reticulospinal tract (RST) fibers and proprioceptive central fibers modulation of levels of spasticity. However, finding effective means to impact these areas is difficult. The Neubie direct current is designed to improve positioning of these stretch receptors. As discussed within the paper hypothesis, the theory is that this may improve spasticity levels as well as agonist strength enough to create long term, significant functional improvement.
Dr. Terry Wahls who has MS and has studied and marketed a protocol for MS treatment, promotes this product and has a home unit she uses daily to control her own MS symptoms and gain strength. Currently there is no research study conducted on the effects of the Neubie direct current treatment combined with exercise and ramifications of spasticity in multiple sclerosis. There have been only a few studies conducted with quantitative spasticity measures mostly with FES and NMES targeting tibialis anterior and quadriceps to lessen plantar flexor spasticity in spinal cord injury (SCI) and hemiplegia. In the SCI study Mirbagheri et al. observed decreases in intrinsic and reflex dynamic stiffness in all 4 subjects studied over a 16-month period. Robinson et al. stimulated quadriceps muscle pulse duration 500, 20 Hz and amplitude of 100 with spasticity quantitatively reduced immediately after stimulation but return of baseline spasticity level when measured 24 hours later. Levin and Hui-Chan assessed sensory level stimulation of the common peroneal nerve for a total of 15, 60 min sessions for 3 weeks in people with hemiplegia using pulse duration 125 continuously at 99Hz and observed inhibition of H-reflex at soleus, increase in dorsiflexion voluntary force and reductions in stretch reflex at triceps surae. The NeuFit method of treatment allows the recipient to voluntarily concentrically or eccentrically activate muscles while receiving the direct current passive eccentric input. In order to assess the feasibility of this papers' hypothesis the investigators will perform a pilot study of 4-6 individuals with MS in the greater Denver metro area.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Littleton, Colorado, United States, 80027
- Centura Health at Home
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Greater than 18 years old (no upper age limit)
- Physician diagnosed MS (As stated in Rooney S, et al. Disabil Rehabil. 2019, stage of MS did not impact individuals from making neuromuscular or functional gains. All stages of MS will be eligible)
- Physician clearance to participate
- Unable to ambulate more than 70 feet at a time and unable to ambulate outside the home, with use of manual chair or power chair as mobility source >= 50% of the time.
- BLE MMT in hips, knees and ankles <=3/5
- Modified Ashworth assessed spasticity levels 1-4
Exclusion Criteria:
- Co-morbidities in cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction in past 1-year, unstable angina, CHF, h/o arrythmia, h/o CVA or TIA in past year, uncontrolled hypertension)
- History of epileptic seizures
- Lower Motor Neuron disease
- Existing pacemaker, defibrillator or other implanted device (other than baclofen pump)
- Unstable long bone fractures of lower limb or trunk
- Allergies to surface electrodes or conductive gel
- Pregnancy or actively seeking to become pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Neubie Treatment
Participants in this study will participate in intervention treatment with the Neubie for 6 weeks. Outcome measures objective and subjective will be collected at the beginning and end of the study. The treatments will include:
|
The Neubie is a direct current neuromuscular electrical stimulation device.
This system uses an exponential wave pattern to mimic the natural pattern neurologically to lengthen fibers of the sarcomere and engage force velocity of muscle with minimized protective co-contraction of nearby muscle groups.
The golgi tendon and muscle spindles code for joint position and muscle/tendon stretch with 66% of fibers being intrafusal.
Impacting these structures has direct impact on reticulospinal tract fibers and proprioceptive central fibers modulation of levels of spasticity.
The Neubie direct current is designed to improve positioning of these stretch receptors.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Expanded Disability Status Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Pre-intervention
|
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time.
It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS.The EDSS scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability.
Scoring is based on an examination by a neurologist.
The neurologist did not measure any change in EDSS score for any of the 7 study subjects from her first assessment to her final second assessment.
|
Baseline, Pre-intervention
|
|
Expanded Disability Status Score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a method of quantifying disability in multiple sclerosis and monitoring changes in the level of disability over time.
It is widely used in clinical trials and in the assessment of people with MS.The EDSS scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability.
Scoring is based on an examination by a neurologist.
The neurologist did not measure any change in EDSS score for any of the 7 study subjects from her first assessment to her final second assessment.
|
6 weeks
|
|
12 Item MS Walking Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Pre-intervention
|
The Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale is a self-assessment scale which measures the impact of MS on walking.
It consists of 12 questions concerning the limitations to walking due to MS.
Each item can be answered with 5 options, with 1 meaning no limitation and 5 extreme limitation.
A total score can be generated and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale by subtracting the minimum score possible (12) from the patient's score, dividing by the maximum score possible minus the minimum possible (60-12 or 48), and multiplying the result by 100.
Walking improvement on the MSWS-12 is indicated by negative change scores.
|
Baseline, Pre-intervention
|
|
12 Item MS Walking Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale is a self-assessment scale which measures the impact of MS on walking.
It consists of 12 questions concerning the limitations to walking due to MS.
Each item can be answered with 5 options, with 1 meaning no limitation and 5 extreme limitation.
A total score can be generated and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale by subtracting the minimum score possible (12) from the patient's score, dividing by the maximum score possible minus the minimum possible (60-12 or 48), and multiplying the result by 100.
Walking improvement on the MSWS-12 is indicated by negative change scores.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Manual Muscle Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Pre-intervention
|
A standardized set of assessments that measure strength.
Scores are provided for each assessed muscle or muscle group individually in a scale from 0 to 5, in which 0 means no palpable muscle contraction, and 5 means a full range of motion capable of resisting 5 pounds of pressure.
This scale of 5 includes values of (-) and (+) for each number which equals a total of 12. Data is entered on a 12-point scale here per requirements in data entry per clinical trials.
|
Baseline, Pre-intervention
|
|
Manual Muscle Test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
A standardized set of assessments that measure strength.
Scores are provided for each assessed muscle or muscle group individually in a scale from 0 to 5, in which 0 means no palpable muscle contraction, and 5 means a full range of motion capable of resisting 5 pounds of pressure.
This scale of 5 includes values of (-) and (+) for each number which equals a total of 12. Data is entered on a 12-point scale here per requirements in data entry per clinical trials.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Timed 25 Foot Walk Test (T25FW)
Time Frame: Baseline, Pre-intervention
|
The T25FW is a clinical tool that evaluates patients for quantitative mobility and leg function performance test in time, 25 foot walk.
|
Baseline, Pre-intervention
|
|
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)
Time Frame: baseline, pre-intervention
|
The Multiple sclerosis impact scale 29 (MSIS-29) is a 29-item assessment combining questions about the physical and psychological impact of the participant's condition on daily living.
All items have Likert style response options that go from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely), where a total score of 145 indicates greater impact of disease on daily function (worse health), and the lower the score (The closer it is to 29), the smaller the impact of multiple sclerosis on the participant's daily function.
|
baseline, pre-intervention
|
|
Timed 25 Foot Walk Test (T25FW)
Time Frame: 3 week
|
The T25FW is a clinical tool that evaluates patients for quantitative mobility and leg function performance test in time, 25-foot walk measured in seconds.
Higher second measures are slower and considered "worse" while lower second measures are faster and considered "better".
|
3 week
|
|
Timed 25 Foot Walk Test (T25FW)
Time Frame: 6 week
|
The T25FW is a clinical tool that evaluates patients for quantitative mobility and leg function performance test in time, 25-foot walk measured in seconds.
Higher second measures are slower and considered "worse" while lower second measures are faster and considered "better".
|
6 week
|
|
Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)
Time Frame: 6 week
|
The Multiple sclerosis impact scale 29 (MSIS-29) is a 29-item assessment combining questions about the physical and psychological impact of the participant's condition on daily living.
All items have Likert style response options that go from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely), where a total score of 145 indicates greater impact of disease on daily function (worse health), and the lower the score (The closer it is to 29), the smaller the impact of multiple sclerosis on the participant's daily function.
|
6 week
|
|
Modified Ashworth Test
Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention
|
The Modified Ashworth Test is measured on a 5-point scale used to assess spasticity by grading the resistance encountered during passive muscle stretching. The assessor rates the perceived amount of resistance or tone encountered during the range of motion. 0=no tone detected 1+ = tone able to move through for less than half the range 2=tone able to move through for more than half the range 3=significant resistance to movement for entire range but able to break tone 4=completely rigid and unable to move limb |
Baseline, pre-intervention
|
|
Modified Ashworth Test
Time Frame: 6 week
|
The Modified Ashworth Test is measured on a 5-point scale used to assess spasticity by grading the resistance encountered during passive muscle stretching. The assessor rates the perceived amount of resistance or tone encountered during the range of motion. 0=no tone detected 1+ = tone able to move through for less than half the range 2=tone able to move through for more than half the range 3=significant resistance to movement for entire range but able to break tone 4=completely rigid and unable to move limb |
6 week
|
|
Manual Muscle Test
Time Frame: 3 week measurement
|
A standardized set of assessments that measure strength.
Scores are provided for each assessed muscle or muscle group individually in a scale from 0 to 5, in which 0 means no palpable muscle contraction, and 5 means a full range of motion capable of resisting 5 pounds of pressure.
This scale of 5 includes values of (-) and (+) for each number which equals a total of 12. Data is entered on a 12-point scale here per requirements in data entry per clinical trials.
|
3 week measurement
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Courtney Ellerbusch, DPT, CommonSpirit Health
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wahls TL, Reese D, Kaplan D, Darling WG. Rehabilitation with neuromuscular electrical stimulation leads to functional gains in ambulation in patients with secondary progressive and primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a case series report. J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Dec;16(12):1343-9. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0080.
- Mills PB, Dossa F. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Management of Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Apr;95(4):309-18. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000437.
- Backus D, Burdett B, Hawkins L, Manella C, McCully KK, Sweatman M. Outcomes After Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycle Training in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis Who Are Nonambulatory. Int J MS Care. 2017 May-Jun;19(3):113-121. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2015-036.
- Etoom M, Khraiwesh Y, Lena F, Hawamdeh M, Hawamdeh Z, Centonze D, Foti C. Effectiveness of Physiotherapy Interventions on Spasticity in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Nov;97(11):793-807. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000970.
- Szecsi J, Schlick C, Schiller M, Pollmann W, Koenig N, Straube A. Functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling of patients with multiple sclerosis: biomechanical and functional outcome--a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Jul;41(8):674-80. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0397.
- Meseguer-Henarejos AB, Sanchez-Meca J, Lopez-Pina JA, Carles-Hernandez R. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):576-590. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04796-7. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1643900-2
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandSwiss National Science FoundationRecruitingMultiple Sclerosis (MS) | Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) | Secondary-progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) | Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS)Switzerland
-
University of California, Los AngelesUnknownRelapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary-progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Primary-progressive Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
BiogenCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Multiple Sclerosis, Primary Progressive | Multiple Sclerosis, Remittent ProgressiveJapan
-
Cabaletta BioNot yet recruitingProgressive Multiple Sclerosis | Multiple Sclerosis | Multiple Sclerosis (Relapsing Remitting) | Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) | Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PMS) | Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting | Multiple Sclerosis - Relapsing Remitting
-
The Cleveland ClinicUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterCompletedRelapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Progressive Relapsing Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiColumbia University; New York Stem Cell Foundation Research InstituteCompletedClinically Isolated Syndrome | Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkOdense University Hospital; Aarhus University Hospital; Hvidovre University Hospital and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingRelapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisDenmark
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedRelapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Active Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisJapan
-
Banc de Sang i TeixitsVall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR)CompletedRelapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisSpain
-
BiogenElan PharmaceuticalsCompletedRelapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisUnited States
Clinical Trials on Neubie
-
NeuFit - Neurological Fitness and EducationUniversity of Texas at AustinWithdrawnRectus DiastasisUnited States
-
NeuFit - Neurological Fitness and EducationMayo Clinic; EA Therapeutic HealthNot yet recruiting
-
NeuFit - Neurological Fitness and EducationCompletedNeuropathyUnited States
-
NeuFit - Neurological Fitness and EducationRecruitingRadiculopathy Lumbar | Radiculopathy Sacral | Radiculopathy Multiple SitesUnited States