- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04949542
Bolster: Caregiver App to Reduce Duration of Untreated Psychosis
Development and Testing of a Caregiver-facing Mobile Health Intervention to Reduce Duration of Untreated Psychosis
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
- Behavioral Research in Technology and Engineering Center, Health Sciences, UW Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years old or older
- Live in the United States
- Caregiver to a young adult with early psychosis, wherein early psychosis is defined as: (1) Being between the ages of 15 and 35, and (2) Within the past five years, the young adult first experienced: (2A) Presence of psychotic symptoms represented by one or more of hallucinations, delusions, marked thought disorder, psychomotor disorder or bizarre behavior, as well as (2B) Definite change of personality or behavior manifesting as two or more of the following: serious deterioration of function, marked social withdrawal, persistent self-neglect, episodic marked anxiety.
- A positive screen according to the Caregiver Prime Screen - Revised (endorsed two or more responses of five or six ("somewhat"/"definitely" agree))
- Own an Apple iPhone
- Self-identify as a caregiver of the affected person
- The affected person is not enrolled in specialty mental health services (i.e. a program wherein the affected person can access psychiatry and counseling/therapy services), and has not been enrolled in such services for at least three months prior to screening. If an affected person is receiving one of these services, the caregiver reports that this is an inadequate level of care.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Incarceration or long-term care setting for either the caregiver or identified affected young adult.
- Participant failed to demonstrate understanding of study details in comprehension screening process.
- The affected person is unengaged in services, but only as a result of having completed or "graduated" from a specialty treatment program for psychosis.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Control
Participants in the control condition will be provided support resources from mental health advocacy organizations representing currently available resources for caregivers (including a selection from the National Alliance on Mental Illness and Mental Health America).
They will also have access to the research team by phone for technical troubleshooting and support as necessary.
|
Exemplar resources provided in the control arm will include a selection from the National Alliance on Mental Illness and Mental Health America designed to support caregivers helping loved ones access care.
|
|
Experimental: Bolster
Participants in the experimental arm will be provided access to the Bolster smartphone application designed to support caregivers of young adults with early psychosis as well as the support resources offered in the control condition.
They will also have access to the research team by phone for technical troubleshooting and support as necessary.
|
Bolster is a native mobile app that provides on-demand content to caregivers of young adults with early psychosis to support their caregiving skills and knowledge of psychosis.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Family Communication
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Family communication will be assessed with the Family Questionnaire (FQ).
The FQ is a 20-item self-report assessment of criticism and emotional expression in interactions with family members toward patients with mental illness.
Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (1 = never/very rarely; 4 = very often).
The FQ is scored by summing individual items with higher scores indicating greater levels of expressed emotion.
As a primary outcome, we will examine the combined total of emotional overinvolvement and critical comments; scores range from 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater expressed emotion.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Treatment Facilitation
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Treatment seeking will be measured using the Measure to Assess Steps to Service-Caregivers (MASS-CG).
The MASS-CG is a 23-item self-report assessment of steps taken by the caregiver towards the attainment of mental health treatment for their loved one, including research, social support, encouragement or support of the loved one's help-seeking actions, and engagement with service provider steps.
Each item is endorsed on a three-point Likert scale (0 = No, I have not done this, 1 = I have done this once or twice, 2 = I have done this multiple times).
The MASS-CG is scored by summing individual items with higher scores indicating greater levels of treatment facilitation activities.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Loved One Treatment Engagement, Medication Provider
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
|
Treatment facilitation / duration of untreated psychosis will be assessed according to participants' report of appointments attended by their relative in the past during the treatment period.
This first category includes meeting with a clinician providing psychiatric medications.
At screening, participants report treatment engagement over the previous three months and during the study period, participants are asked to report on this weekly.
This count variable represents the number of participants who reported that their loved one attended an appointment with a medication provider in the three months preceding the study period reported at screening ("Baseline") as well as for the duration of the study period reported in weekly brief assessments ("12 weeks").
The 12 week data point includes participants who completed at least half of the weekly brief assessments.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Loved One Treatment Engagement, Therapy or Counseling
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
|
Treatment facilitation / duration of untreated psychosis will be assessed according to participants' report of appointments attended by their relative in the past during the treatment period.
This first category includes meeting with a clinician providing mental health therapy or counseling.
At screening, participants report treatment engagement over the previous three months and during the study period, participants are asked to report on this weekly.
This count variable represents the number of participants who reported that their loved one attended an appointment for psychotherapy or counseling in the three months preceding the study period reported at screening ("Baseline") as well as for the duration of the study period reported in weekly brief assessments ("12 weeks").
The 12 week data point includes participants who completed at least half of the weekly brief assessments.
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Illness Knowledge, Factual Knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
This is assessed with the Knowledge About Schizophrenia (KAST), an 18-item multiple-choice assessment examining individuals' knowledge of the etiology, symptoms, and prognosis of schizophrenia.
Total scores indicate the number of correct responses, and thus range from 0 to 18.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Illness Knowledge, Caregiver Self-rated
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Illness appraisals will be assessed with the Illness Perception Questionnaire for Schizophrenia Relatives (IPQSR), a self-report scale of caregivers' beliefs about the severity, prognosis, and responsiveness to treatment of mental illnesses.
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree), and totals are scored by summing individual items.
For the coherence total, we are totaling the 5 items related to the caregiver's report of how much they understand or know about their loved one's illness.
Scores range from 5 to 25 with lower scores indicating better self-rated understanding or coherence.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Illness Appraisals, Consequences
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Illness appraisals will be assessed with the Illness Perception Questionnaire for Schizophrenia Relatives (IPQSR), a self-report scale of caregivers' beliefs about the severity, prognosis, and responsiveness to treatment of mental illnesses.
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree), and totals are scored by summing individual items.
For the consequences total, we are totaling the 20 items related to consequences affecting the caregiver and the affected person.
Scores range from 20 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater perceptions of negative consequences.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Illness Appraisals, Control
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Illness appraisals will be assessed with the Illness Perception Questionnaire for Schizophrenia Relatives (IPQSR), a self-report scale of caregivers' beliefs about the severity, prognosis, and responsiveness to treatment of mental illnesses.
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree), and totals are scored by summing individual items.
For the control total, we are totaling the 8 items related to caregiver, affected person, and treatment control over illness course.
Scores range from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater perceptions of possibilities for actions that affect the course of illness.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Illness Appraisals, Emotional Distress About Illness
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Illness appraisals will be assessed with the Illness Perception Questionnaire for Schizophrenia Relatives (IPQSR), a self-report scale of caregivers' beliefs about the severity, prognosis, and responsiveness to treatment of mental illnesses.
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree), and totals are scored by summing individual items.
For the emotional distress score, we are examining the emotional representation scale, a 9-item scale with scores ranging from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater emotional distress.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Appraisal of Caregiving Experiences**
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Appraisals of caregiving experiences will be assessed with the Brief Experience of Caregiving Inventory (BECI).** The BECI is a 19-item assessment of the impact of caregiving on the individual's life, both in negative and positive ways. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (never to nearly always), and scores range from 0 to 76, with a higher score denoting more negative appraisals of one's caregiving experience. **NOTE: The version of the BECI that was administered used instructions asking participants to report on their experiences in the month following their loved one's first hospitalization. Due to this, this measure is best interpreted as caregivers' changing appraisals of their early experiences of caregiving. There was also heterogeneity in participants' report of their loved one ever having experienced a hospitalization in our sample that also affects interpretation of this measure. |
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Caregiver Coping, Activities
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Caregiver coping will be assessed with the Brief COPE Inventory, a 28-item self-report scale of coping skills in response to stressors, based on the full COPE inventory; items generate a range of subscale scores related to specific coping areas.
The instrument consists of 28 items which will be scored on a 1 to 4 Likert scale (I haven't been doing this at all to I've been doing this a lot), with higher values representing a greater frequency of engaging in each coping strategy.
For this outcome, we will examine total frequency sum of items (14) assessing variables a priori selected to represent adaptive coping.
Scores on this scale range from 14 to 56.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Caregiver Coping, Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Caregiver coping self-efficacy will be assessed with the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, a 26-item self-report questionnaire measuring the perceived ability of coping with various life challenges.
Responses are rated on a 0 to 10 scale, and scores range from 0 to 260, with higher scores denoting a greater sense of self-efficacy in coping.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
|
Change in Caregiver Distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Caregiver distress (secondary mediator) will be assessed with General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), a 12-item questionnaire assessing general psychological morbidity.
Respondents indicate agreement on a four-point scale (0 = Not at all; 3 = More than usual) and total scores ranging from 0 to 36 with higher scores indicating more severe psychological morbidity.
|
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intervention feasibility
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Intervention feasibility will be assessed with usage statistics, including time spent in the application and number of days in the study period that the app was engaged.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Intervention acceptability / usability
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Usability/acceptability will be assessed with a modified version of the System Usability Scale derived from our group's previous work developing mHealth interventions.
This measure, which comprises 26 items based on four measures - the System Usability Scale, Post Study System Usability Scale,Technology Assessment Model Measurement Scales, and Usefulness, Satisfaction and Ease Questionnaire - assesses participants' experiences with the intervention during the study period.
Each item is scored on a 3-point scale (1 = disagree; 3 = agree).
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Benjamin Buck, PhD, University of Washington
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00013334
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Caregiver to a Young Adult With Early Psychosis
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNorth Carolina Department of Health and Human ServicesRecruitingCaregiver | Family Caregivers | Caregiver Distress | Caregiver to a Young Adult With Early PsychosisUnited States
-
Hôpital le VinatierNot yet recruitingCaregiver Burden | First Episode Psychosis (FEP) | Nurse Practitioners | IMPACT OF A NEW PSYCHOEDUCATION PROGRAM COORDINATED BY AN ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSE ON THE BURDEN OF FAMILY CAREGIVERS OF PATIENTS WITH A FIRST PSYCHOTIC EPISODEFrance
-
Max-Planck-Institute of PsychiatryCompletedSchizophrenia | Schizoaffective Disorder | Delusional Disorder | Schizotypal Disorder | Brief Psychotic Disorder | Shared Psychotic Disorder | Other Psychotic Disorder Not Due to A Substance or Known Physiological Condition | Unspecified Psychosis Not Due to a Substance or Known Physiological Condition and other conditionsGermany
-
Sanford HealthNational Ataxia Foundation; Beyond Batten Disease Foundation; Pitt Hopkins Research... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMitochondrial Diseases | Retinitis Pigmentosa | Myasthenia Gravis | Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis | Moyamoya Disease | Multiple System Atrophy | Leiomyosarcoma | Leukodystrophy | Anal Fistula | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Friedreich Ataxia | Kennedy Disease | Lyme Disease | Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis | Spinocerebellar... and other conditionsUnited States, Australia
-
RTI InternationalEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationPrimary Hyperoxaluria Type 3 | Diabetes Mellitus | Hemophilia A | Hemophilia B | Hereditary Fructose Intolerance | Cystic Fibrosis | Factor VII Deficiency | Phenylketonurias | Sickle Cell Disease | Dravet Syndrome | Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy | Prader-Willi Syndrome | Fragile X Syndrome | Chronic Granulomatous Disease and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Bolster
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingGynecologic Cancer | Advanced Cancer | Gastrointestinal CancerUnited States
-
Dow University of Health SciencesCompletedSkin Graft DetachmentPakistan
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNorth Carolina Department of Health and Human ServicesRecruitingCaregiver | Family Caregivers | Caregiver Distress | Caregiver to a Young Adult With Early PsychosisUnited States
-
University of California, DavisRecruiting
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedGynecologic Cancer | Gastrointestinal CancerUnited States
-
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen UniversityCompletedSkin Transplantation
-
University of Southern CaliforniaCompletedSkin Graft ComplicationsUnited States
-
Southwest Oncology GroupNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnBreast CancerUnited States