Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Patient-Specific Enteroatmospheric Fistula Isolation and Management Device Independent of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

September 15, 2023 updated by: Andrew Bernard
This study aims to assess the efficacy of a custom fitted device designed to isolate enteroatmospheric fistulas effluent independent of negative pressure wound therapy and to evaluate the effects on the device related to dressing changes, time required for dressing changes, management costs, and the ease of use.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Anna Rockich, PharmD, MS
  • Phone Number: 859-323-6346
  • Email: arockich@uky.edu

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • University of Kentucky

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stable condition, as determined by attending physician
  • Has enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF) in the setting of open abdomen
  • EAF is determined to require surgical resolution

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable condition, as determined by attending physician
  • Significant risk of complication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF) management solution
Participants will receive a custom fitted device designed to isolate EAF effluent independent of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) utilizing 3D printing technology to design a participant-matched device that more easily and effectively separates the participant's fistula and any emanated intestinal contents surrounding the wound.
Participants will receive a customized 3D printed device based on the EAF's output, size, shape, location, depth, and the participant's wound bed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Inpatient Participant Pain Rating
Time Frame: Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
Participants will be asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1-10, where 10 indicates more pain.
Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
Change in Outpatient Participant Pain Rating
Time Frame: Weekly from discharge until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
Participants will be asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1-10, where 10 indicates more pain.
Weekly from discharge until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
Change in Inpatient Participant Mobility Assessment
Time Frame: Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
Mobility will be assessed by asking the participant to select the following statement that most accurately describes their mobility: a. completely immobile; b. unable to sit up supported for less than 10 minutes; c. able to sit supported for more than 10 minutes; d. able to sit unsupported, can lift arms; e. can stand up and pivot torso; or f. can walk and move with minimal assistance required.
Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
Change in Outpatient Participant Mobility Assessment
Time Frame: Weekly from until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
Mobility will be assessed by asking the participant to select the following statement that most accurately describes their mobility: a. completely immobile; b. unable to sit up supported for less than 10 minutes; c. able to sit supported for more than 10 minutes; d. able to sit unsupported, can lift arms; e. can stand up and pivot torso; or f. Can walk and move with minimal assistance required.
Weekly from until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
Change in Number of Required Wound Dressing Changes - Inpatient
Time Frame: Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
The number of dressing changes will be tracked for inpatients on a daily bases.
Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
Change in Number of Required Wound Dressing Changes - Outpatient
Time Frame: Daily from discharge until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
The number of dressing changes will be tracked for outpatients on a daily bases.
Daily from discharge until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
Change in Perceived Usefulness - Inpatient
Time Frame: Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
Inpatient participants will be asked three questions about the perceived usefulness of the device. The questions use a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, where strongly agree indicates a higher perceived usefulness.
Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
Change in Perceived Usefulness - Outpatient
Time Frame: Weekly from discharge until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
Outpatient participants will be asked two questions about the perceived usefulness of the device. The questions use a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, where strongly agree indicates a higher perceived usefulness.
Weekly from discharge until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
Change in Perceived Ease of Use - Inpatient
Time Frame: Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
Inpatient participants will be asked four questions about the perceived ease of use of the device. The question uses a 5 point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, where strongly agree indicates a higher perceived ease of use.
Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
Change in Perceived Ease of Use - Outpatient
Time Frame: Weekly from discharge until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
Inpatient participants will be asked four questions about the perceived ease of use of the device. The question uses a 5 point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree, where strongly agree indicates a higher perceived ease of use.
Weekly from discharge until fistula resolves or study ends, up to 1 year
Change in Average Time of Required Fistula-specific Dressing Changes - Inpatient
Time Frame: Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year
The time required to change the wound dressings will be recorded.
Daily from admission to discharge, up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Infection Rates
Time Frame: Through duration of study, up to 1 year
The number of infections in participants that are related to the device will be recorded.
Through duration of study, up to 1 year
Number of Observed Leakages
Time Frame: Through duration of study, up to 1 year
The number of observed leakages in participants that are related to the device will be recorded.
Through duration of study, up to 1 year
Length of Stay
Time Frame: Through duration of study, up to 1 year
Length of stay in hospital
Through duration of study, up to 1 year
Fistula Resolution Time
Time Frame: Through duration of study, up to 1 year
Fistula resolution time for participants
Through duration of study, up to 1 year
Complication Occurrences
Time Frame: Through duration of study, up to 1 year
The number of complication occurrences related to the device will be recorded.
Through duration of study, up to 1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost Analysis of the 3D Printed Device
Time Frame: Weekly from beginning of study until the end of the study, up to 1 year
The cost of the patient management with the device will be estimated
Weekly from beginning of study until the end of the study, up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Bernard, MD, FACS, University of Kentucky

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 46641

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fistula

Clinical Trials on 3D printed EAF management device

3
Subscribe