Comparison Between Pupillometry and the Numerical Rating Scale

Comparison Between Pupillometry and the Numerical Rating Scale for the Assessment of Pain in Communicating Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Room.

Given the difficulties encountered with subjective pain assessment tools, one of the ideas for reducing the occurrence of insufficient analgesia administration in the emergency department is to find a tool capable of measuring pain without requiring the patient's participation, and which could be integrated into the systematic measurement of the 4 other vitals. An interesting idea is the measurement of pupillary diameter and its reflex variations by a portable pupillometer. Indeed, the diameter of the pupil (DP) reflects the constant interactions between the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems at the level of the iris muscles. Pupillometry measures the change in pupillary diameter and allows the performance of three dynamic tests useful in the assessment of pain.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

320

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussel, Belgium, 1200
        • Recruiting
        • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients presenting to the emergency room, aged 18 years or over, able to communicate, with hemodynamic and respiratory stability, are eligible.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Refusal to participate in the study; refusal to sign informed consent.
  • Consent impossible to obtain (cognitive disorders, language barrier…).
  • Patient taking immediate-release opioid medication (last dose within the last 12 hours).
  • Patient taking prolonged-release opioid medication (last dose within the last 24 hours).
  • Basic treatment with a dopaminergic D2 antagonist (antipsychotic drugs).
  • Basic treatment with dopamine antagonist antiemetic medication (metoclopramide (T1/2 5-6h), domperidone (T1/2 7-9h), alizapride (T1/2 3h)) within the last 12 hours.
  • Patient taking clonidine (last dose within the last 24 hours).
  • Use of topical ocular drugs modifying pupillary parameters in the last 24 hours.
  • Bilateral eye surgery modifying the possibilities of variation in pupillary diameter bilaterally.
  • Parkinson's or Alzheimer's disease at a dysautonomic stage.
  • Admission to the emergency room for acute ocular pathology.
  • History of diabetes at a dysautonomic stage.
  • History of alcoholism at a dysautonomic stage.
  • History of glaucoma.
  • Pregnant patient with preeclampsia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diagnostic Test: pupillometry

Step 1: The triage will be carried out by the nurse. The nurse will then perform a self-assessment of the patient's pain using a simple verbal scale.

The nurse will then record the patient's self-assessment of his pain using the numeric scale for pain.

Step 2: Immediately after this first assessment, eligible patients will be approached by the study investigator to be included in the study.

Step 3: If the patient gives informed consent, the study investigator will perform

  • The quantification of their anxiety
  • An assessment of pain by a NeuroLight videopupillometer (iDmed, Marseille, France) using two dynamic tests, the Pupillary Unrest in Ambient Light (PUAL) and the pupillary light reflex.

Step 4: One hour after the triage, a second pain assessment will be performed. Step 5: The same pupillometry measurements will be taken immediately after the nurse has assessed the pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome will be the correlation between the pupillometry values and those obtained by the numerical pain rating scale with a correlation coefficient of 0.78.
Time Frame: 1 minute
1 minute

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The evolution of the Pupillary Unrest in Ambient Light depending on the type of opioid (morphine versus weak opioid like tramadol) received by the patient.
Time Frame: one hour
one hour
The endpoint will be the evaluation of the performance of pupillometry to predict the occurrence of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥ 4 using the ROC curve (AUC).
Time Frame: 1 minute
1 minute
The correlation of the pupillometric parameters with the level of anxiety quantified by a numeric scale next to 1 (not anxious) to 10 (maximum level of anxiety).
Time Frame: 1 minute
1 minute
The correlation between the initial measurement of PUAL and the analgesic response to an opioid medication.
Time Frame: one hour
one hour
The correlation between the pain measurements obtained by the reception nurse and that obtained by the patient.
Time Frame: 2 minutes
2 minutes
The evolution of the pupillary light reflex depending on the type of opioid (morphine versus weak opioid like tramadol) received by the patient.
Time Frame: 1 minute
1 minute

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 4, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PEWC_MAYS2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Acute

Clinical Trials on pupillometry

3
Subscribe