Effectiveness of Peripheral Blocks Under Ultrasound Control With and Without Electrical Nerve Stimulation (EPBwEPN)

August 8, 2022 updated by: Valery Piacherski, Ph.D., Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital

Effectiveness of Peripheral Blocks Under Ultrasound Control With and Without Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Lower Limb Surgeries

In modern anesthesiology, peripheral nerve blocks are performed using ultrasound control and electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves (PEN), or only ultrasound control or only PEN. The most effective methods are with the use of ultrasound control. Until now, the effectiveness of the sciatic nerve blockade by the subgluteal approach, performed only under ultrasound control without ESP, in comparison with the blockade of the sciatic nerve performed under ultrasound control with ESP, has not been established.

Research hypothesis: the blockade of the sciatic nerve by the subgluteal approach performed only under ultrasound control has the same effectiveness as the blockade performed under the ultrasound control with EPN.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mogilev, Belarus, 212026
        • Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • indication requiring anesthesia maintenance;
  • patient's written consent about the type of anesthesia and possible complications of regional anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient's refusal of application for the proposed form of anesthesia;
  • patients younger than 18 years;
  • patients weighing less than 50 kg;
  • a physical status score of more than 3 determined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA);
  • a history of allergic reactions to the drugs used;
  • coagulopathies;
  • infections of the skin at the injection site;
  • neurological or neuromuscular diseases;
  • severe liver diseases or kidney failures;
  • an inability to cooperate with the patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Sciatic nerve block under ultrasound control with a electrostimulator peripheral nerves
Patients undergoing surgery on the knee, shin, ankle or foot

Following the ultrasound visualization of the sciatic nerve, a insulated injection needle was connected to the nerve stimulator . Under ultrasound visualization guidance, the needle of the electronic nerve stimulator was positioned at the sciatic nerve (in plane) from its lateral side at a slightly superior position . A marker for LA introduction was the visualization of the needle end near the nerve, and a positive muscular response . Subsequently, the introduction of LA solution was initiated.If LA was spreading from the lateral side down to the nerve, then the needle was replaced to the upper point of the nerve and the rest of LA was introduced, and vice versa . The presence of a complete and incomplete spread of LA along the entire circumference of the nerve was assessed. Correspondingly, if the anesthetic was spreading upwardly, the needle would be downwardly replaced.

In addition, a femoral nerve block is performed.

Other: Sciatic nerve block under ultrasound control without a electrostimulator peripheral nerves
Patients undergoing surgery on the knee, shin, ankle or foot

Under ultrasound visualization guidance, the needle owas positioned at the sciatic nerve (in plane) from its lateral side at a slightly superior position . A marker for LA introduction was the visualization of the needle end near the nerve. Subsequently, the introduction of LA solution was initiated. The position of the needle was corrected 1-2 times according to the type of anesthetic spread. If LA was spreading from the lateral side down to the nerve, then the needle was replaced to the upper point of the nerve and the rest of LA was introduced, and vice versa . The presence of a complete and incomplete spread of LA along the entire circumference of the nerve was assessed. Correspondingly, if the anesthetic was spreading upwardly, the needle would be downwardly replaced.

In addition, a femoral nerve block is performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The need for additional pain relief during surgery
Time Frame: During the operation (start of operation - end of operation)
The need for additional use of narcotic analgesics or local anesthesia during surgery (criterion-reporting of painful feelings during the operation). Based on the patient's complaint about pain of any intensity during the operation.
During the operation (start of operation - end of operation)
Сomplete sensory sciatic nerve block
Time Frame: The quality of sensory blocks was assessed after 45 min of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been
The stimulus of the needle prick was applied to check the sensory block of the sciatic nerve. Stimulation with a needle is carried out in the area of innervation of the sciatic nerve below the knee The assessment of skin sensitivity was carried out with the help of a similar scale: + +\ indicating a complete sensory block; +\ indicating a partial sensory block, a patient was unable to differentiate between the type of stimuli ; and -\ indicating that the skin sensitivity was fully preserved.
The quality of sensory blocks was assessed after 45 min of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been
Сomplete motor sciatic nerve block
Time Frame: The quality of motor blocks was assessed after 45 min of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been
The assessment of the motor block was carried out with the help of the following scale: + +\ which indicated that movements were completely absent; +\ which indicated that movements were partially preserved or were uncoordinated; and -\ which indicated that movements were fully preserved.Flexion-extension of the foot and toes is assessed
The quality of motor blocks was assessed after 45 min of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Contact us: Valery Piacherski, Ph.D.; pechersky.v@yandex.ru

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After publishing the data

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact us: Valery Piacherski, Ph.D.; pechersky.v@yandex.ru

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasonography

Clinical Trials on sciatic nerve blockade under ultrasound control with a peripheral nerve stimulator

Subscribe