- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05054881
Effectiveness of Peripheral Blocks Under Ultrasound Control With and Without Electrical Nerve Stimulation (EPBwEPN)
Effectiveness of Peripheral Blocks Under Ultrasound Control With and Without Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Lower Limb Surgeries
In modern anesthesiology, peripheral nerve blocks are performed using ultrasound control and electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves (PEN), or only ultrasound control or only PEN. The most effective methods are with the use of ultrasound control. Until now, the effectiveness of the sciatic nerve blockade by the subgluteal approach, performed only under ultrasound control without ESP, in comparison with the blockade of the sciatic nerve performed under ultrasound control with ESP, has not been established.
Research hypothesis: the blockade of the sciatic nerve by the subgluteal approach performed only under ultrasound control has the same effectiveness as the blockade performed under the ultrasound control with EPN.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Mogilev, Belarus, 212026
- Mogilev Regional Clinical Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- indication requiring anesthesia maintenance;
- patient's written consent about the type of anesthesia and possible complications of regional anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria:
- patient's refusal of application for the proposed form of anesthesia;
- patients younger than 18 years;
- patients weighing less than 50 kg;
- a physical status score of more than 3 determined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA);
- a history of allergic reactions to the drugs used;
- coagulopathies;
- infections of the skin at the injection site;
- neurological or neuromuscular diseases;
- severe liver diseases or kidney failures;
- an inability to cooperate with the patient.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Sciatic nerve block under ultrasound control with a electrostimulator peripheral nerves
Patients undergoing surgery on the knee, shin, ankle or foot
|
Following the ultrasound visualization of the sciatic nerve, a insulated injection needle was connected to the nerve stimulator . Under ultrasound visualization guidance, the needle of the electronic nerve stimulator was positioned at the sciatic nerve (in plane) from its lateral side at a slightly superior position . A marker for LA introduction was the visualization of the needle end near the nerve, and a positive muscular response . Subsequently, the introduction of LA solution was initiated.If LA was spreading from the lateral side down to the nerve, then the needle was replaced to the upper point of the nerve and the rest of LA was introduced, and vice versa . The presence of a complete and incomplete spread of LA along the entire circumference of the nerve was assessed. Correspondingly, if the anesthetic was spreading upwardly, the needle would be downwardly replaced. In addition, a femoral nerve block is performed. |
|
Other: Sciatic nerve block under ultrasound control without a electrostimulator peripheral nerves
Patients undergoing surgery on the knee, shin, ankle or foot
|
Under ultrasound visualization guidance, the needle owas positioned at the sciatic nerve (in plane) from its lateral side at a slightly superior position . A marker for LA introduction was the visualization of the needle end near the nerve. Subsequently, the introduction of LA solution was initiated. The position of the needle was corrected 1-2 times according to the type of anesthetic spread. If LA was spreading from the lateral side down to the nerve, then the needle was replaced to the upper point of the nerve and the rest of LA was introduced, and vice versa . The presence of a complete and incomplete spread of LA along the entire circumference of the nerve was assessed. Correspondingly, if the anesthetic was spreading upwardly, the needle would be downwardly replaced. In addition, a femoral nerve block is performed. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The need for additional pain relief during surgery
Time Frame: During the operation (start of operation - end of operation)
|
The need for additional use of narcotic analgesics or local anesthesia during surgery (criterion-reporting of painful feelings during the operation).
Based on the patient's complaint about pain of any intensity during the operation.
|
During the operation (start of operation - end of operation)
|
|
Сomplete sensory sciatic nerve block
Time Frame: The quality of sensory blocks was assessed after 45 min of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been
|
The stimulus of the needle prick was applied to check the sensory block of the sciatic nerve.
Stimulation with a needle is carried out in the area of innervation of the sciatic nerve below the knee The assessment of skin sensitivity was carried out with the help of a similar scale: + +\ indicating a complete sensory block; +\ indicating a partial sensory block, a patient was unable to differentiate between the type of stimuli ; and -\ indicating that the skin sensitivity was fully preserved.
|
The quality of sensory blocks was assessed after 45 min of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been
|
|
Сomplete motor sciatic nerve block
Time Frame: The quality of motor blocks was assessed after 45 min of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been
|
The assessment of the motor block was carried out with the help of the following scale: + +\ which indicated that movements were completely absent; +\ which indicated that movements were partially preserved or were uncoordinated; and -\ which indicated that movements were fully preserved.Flexion-extension of the foot and toes is assessed
|
The quality of motor blocks was assessed after 45 min of administration of the sciatic nerve block. The evaluation of the block was carried out by an anesthesiologist who was not involved in the study, and was blinded to solution that had been
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 4
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ultrasonography
-
ALİEMANNot yet recruitingCentral Venous Catheters/Standards | Ultrasonography/Methods | Ultrasonography/Standards
-
Charles University, Czech RepublicNot yet recruitingUltrasonographyCzech Republic
-
Yale UniversityCompletedUltrasonographyUnited States
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalNot yet recruitingNeuraxial Ultrasonography
-
Poitiers University HospitalCompletedUltrasonography | ObstetricsFrance
-
Università degli Studi di BresciaCompletedUltrasonography, PrenatalItaly
-
Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc de LyonUnknownUltrasonography | DiaphragmFrance
-
Assuta Medical CenterUnknown
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompletedUltrasonography Skills
Clinical Trials on sciatic nerve blockade under ultrasound control with a peripheral nerve stimulator
-
Mogilev Regional Clinical HospitalCompletedUltrasonography | Nerve Block | Efficiency | Femoral NerveBelarus
-
Mogilev Regional Clinical HospitalCompletedUltrasonography | Sciatic Nerve | Nerve Block | Efficiency | Minimum Effective DoseBelarus
-
Mogilev Regional Clinical HospitalRecruitingUltrasonography | Nerve Block | Efficiency | Femoral Nerve | Minimum Effective DoseBelarus
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeGolden Jubilee National HospitalUnknown
-
CES UniversityHospital Pablo Tobón Uribe; Clinica CESUnknown
-
Halyard HealthCompletedPostoperative PainUnited States
-
Larissa University HospitalUnknownSurgery | Total Knee ReplacementGreece
-
Asan Medical CenterUnknownPain, Postoperative | Acute Pain | Preemptive Peripheral Nerve BlockKorea, Republic of
-
University of California, San DiegoThe Cleveland Clinic; Augusta University; United States Naval Medical Center,... and other collaboratorsCompletedRotator Cuff Repair | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Ankle Arthrodesis or Arthroplasty | Hallux Valgus CorrectionUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceRecruitingThis Study is Testing the Use of MatriDermFrance