Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Ophthalmic Lenses With Extra Power

October 10, 2021 updated by: Essilor International

Data Collection of Objective Parameters and Subjective Feedback on Visually Fatigued Subjects and Evaluation of the Effect of Ophthalmic Lenses to Alleviate Visual Fatigue

To evaluate subjective visual performance and objective visual parameters when wearing ophthalmic lenses with extra power (+0.4 D or +0.6 D), and ophthalmic lenses with a selective blue cut filter.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

127

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 39 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjective report of visual fatigue
  • Non-presbyopes
  • Permanent wearers who wear glasses for at least 5 hours a day
  • Distance refractive error within the range of [+6.00 to -6.00]* (with cylinder in the negative form),
  • Cylindrical component of the refractive error within the range of 0 to 2 D in both eyes,
  • Anisometropia ≤ 1.00 D in sperical equivalent,
  • Visual acuity of +0.10 logMAR or better in each eye with new prescription at distance (high contrast/high luminance),
  • Distance visual acuity difference ≤0.20 logMAR between right and left eye (high contrast, high luminance)
  • Near binocular visual acuity of +0.10 logMAR or better with a new prescription (high contrast, high luminance),
  • Study frame characteristics: Frame B size at least 22 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vulnerability of the subject,
  • Participation in another study which might have an influence on vision or interfere with study assessments,
  • Binocular vision problems,
  • Known ocular pathology (e.g., age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma…),
  • Any previous ocular surgery which might have an influence on vision or interfere with study assessments (e.g., iridectomy, refractive surgery…),
  • Any untreated and/or uncontrolled systemic condition which might have an influence on vision, or interfere with study assessments (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled high blood pressure…),
  • Any medical treatment or medication that might have an influence on vision or interfere with study assessments (e.g., antidepressants, drugs with atropinic effects…),
  • Knowledge/expertise in optometry, ophthalmic lenses, or optics based on past or current professional activity (e.g., optometrists, opticians, ophthalmologists…)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 20-29 years (+0.40D extra power)
Other: 30-35 years (+0.40D extra power)
Other: 20-29 years (+0.40D extra power with blue cut)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in number of participants with treatment-related adverse events between the two lenses
Time Frame: Immediately after the first and second wearing period (21 days each)
Any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or any untoward clinical signs (including an abnormal laboratory finding) in subjects, users or other persons whether or not related to the investigational medical device. Determined by subject's spontaneous reporting, the Investigator's non-leading questioning and his/her evaluation.
Immediately after the first and second wearing period (21 days each)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 6, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ESS-TEC 191

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthenopia

Clinical Trials on Ophthalmic lens with extra power

Subscribe